A loyalty scheme to encourage physical activity in office workers: a cluster RCT

R. Hunter, A. Gough, Jennifer M. Murray, Jianjun Tang, S. Brennan, Oliver J. Chrzanowski-Smith, A. Carlin, C. Patterson, A. Longo, George Hutchinson, L. Prior, M. Tully, D. French, Jean Adams, E. McIntosh, Y. Xin, F. Kee
{"title":"A loyalty scheme to encourage physical activity in office workers: a cluster RCT","authors":"R. Hunter, A. Gough, Jennifer M. Murray, Jianjun Tang, S. Brennan, Oliver J. Chrzanowski-Smith, A. Carlin, C. Patterson, A. Longo, George Hutchinson, L. Prior, M. Tully, D. French, Jean Adams, E. McIntosh, Y. Xin, F. Kee","doi":"10.3310/phr07150","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n Increasing physical activity in the workplace can provide physical and mental health benefits for employees and economic benefits for the employer through reduced absenteeism and increased productivity. However, there is limited evidence on effective behaviour change interventions in workplace settings that led to maintained physical activity. This study aimed to address this gap and contribute to the evidence base for effective and cost-effective workplace interventions.\n \n \n \n To determine the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of the Physical Activity Loyalty scheme, a multicomponent intervention based on concepts similar to those that underpin a high-street loyalty card, which was aimed at encouraging habitual physical activity behaviour and maintaining increases in mean number of steps per day.\n \n \n \n A cluster randomised controlled trial with an embedded economic evaluation, behavioural economic experiments, mediation analyses and process evaluation.\n \n \n \n Office-based employees from public sector organisations in Belfast and Lisburn city centres in Northern Ireland.\n \n \n \n A total of 853 participants [mean age 43.6 years (standard deviation 9.6 years); 71% of participants were female] were randomly allocated by cluster to either the intervention group or the (waiting list) control group.\n \n \n \n The 6-month intervention consisted of financial incentives (retail vouchers), feedback and other evidence-based behaviour change techniques. Sensors situated in the vicinity of the workplaces allowed participants to monitor their accumulated minutes of physical activity.\n \n \n \n The primary outcome was mean number of steps per day recorded using a sealed pedometer (Yamax Digiwalker CW-701; Yamax, Tasley, UK) worn on the waist for 7 consecutive days and at 6 and 12 months post intervention. Secondary outcomes included health, mental well-being, quality of life, work absenteeism and presenteeism, and the use of health-care resources.\n \n \n \n The mean number of steps per day were significantly lower for the intervention group than the control group [6990 mean number of steps per day (standard deviation 3078) vs. 7576 mean number of steps per day (standard deviation 3345), respectively], with an adjusted mean difference of –336 steps (95% confidence interval –612 to –60 steps; p = 0.02) at 6 months post baseline, but not significantly lower at 12 months post baseline. There was a small but significant enhancement of mental well-being in the intervention group (difference between groups for the Warwick–Edinburgh Mental Wellbeing Scale of 1.34 points, 95% confidence interval 0.48 to 2.20 points), but not for the other secondary outcomes. An economic evaluation suggested that, overall, the scheme was not cost-effective compared with no intervention. The intervention was £25.85 (95% confidence interval –£29.89 to £81.60) more costly per participant than no intervention and had no effect on quality-adjusted life-years (incremental quality-adjusted life-years –0.0000891, 95% confidence interval –0.008 to 0.008).\n \n \n \n Significant restructuring of participating organisations during the study resulted in lower than anticipated recruitment and retention rates. Technical issues affected intervention fidelity.\n \n \n \n Overall, assignment to the intervention group resulted in a small but significant decline in the mean pedometer-measured steps per day at 6 months relative to baseline, compared with the waiting list control group. The Physical Activity Loyalty scheme was deemed not to be cost-effective compared with no intervention, primarily because no additional quality-adjusted life-years were gained through the intervention. Research to better understand the mechanisms of physical activity behaviour change maintenance will help the design of future interventions.\n \n \n \n Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN17975376.\n \n \n \n This project was funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Public Health Research programme and will be published in full in Public Health Research; Vol. 7, No. 15. See the NIHR Journals Library website for further project information.\n","PeriodicalId":32306,"journal":{"name":"Public Health Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Public Health Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3310/phr07150","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

Increasing physical activity in the workplace can provide physical and mental health benefits for employees and economic benefits for the employer through reduced absenteeism and increased productivity. However, there is limited evidence on effective behaviour change interventions in workplace settings that led to maintained physical activity. This study aimed to address this gap and contribute to the evidence base for effective and cost-effective workplace interventions. To determine the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of the Physical Activity Loyalty scheme, a multicomponent intervention based on concepts similar to those that underpin a high-street loyalty card, which was aimed at encouraging habitual physical activity behaviour and maintaining increases in mean number of steps per day. A cluster randomised controlled trial with an embedded economic evaluation, behavioural economic experiments, mediation analyses and process evaluation. Office-based employees from public sector organisations in Belfast and Lisburn city centres in Northern Ireland. A total of 853 participants [mean age 43.6 years (standard deviation 9.6 years); 71% of participants were female] were randomly allocated by cluster to either the intervention group or the (waiting list) control group. The 6-month intervention consisted of financial incentives (retail vouchers), feedback and other evidence-based behaviour change techniques. Sensors situated in the vicinity of the workplaces allowed participants to monitor their accumulated minutes of physical activity. The primary outcome was mean number of steps per day recorded using a sealed pedometer (Yamax Digiwalker CW-701; Yamax, Tasley, UK) worn on the waist for 7 consecutive days and at 6 and 12 months post intervention. Secondary outcomes included health, mental well-being, quality of life, work absenteeism and presenteeism, and the use of health-care resources. The mean number of steps per day were significantly lower for the intervention group than the control group [6990 mean number of steps per day (standard deviation 3078) vs. 7576 mean number of steps per day (standard deviation 3345), respectively], with an adjusted mean difference of –336 steps (95% confidence interval –612 to –60 steps; p = 0.02) at 6 months post baseline, but not significantly lower at 12 months post baseline. There was a small but significant enhancement of mental well-being in the intervention group (difference between groups for the Warwick–Edinburgh Mental Wellbeing Scale of 1.34 points, 95% confidence interval 0.48 to 2.20 points), but not for the other secondary outcomes. An economic evaluation suggested that, overall, the scheme was not cost-effective compared with no intervention. The intervention was £25.85 (95% confidence interval –£29.89 to £81.60) more costly per participant than no intervention and had no effect on quality-adjusted life-years (incremental quality-adjusted life-years –0.0000891, 95% confidence interval –0.008 to 0.008). Significant restructuring of participating organisations during the study resulted in lower than anticipated recruitment and retention rates. Technical issues affected intervention fidelity. Overall, assignment to the intervention group resulted in a small but significant decline in the mean pedometer-measured steps per day at 6 months relative to baseline, compared with the waiting list control group. The Physical Activity Loyalty scheme was deemed not to be cost-effective compared with no intervention, primarily because no additional quality-adjusted life-years were gained through the intervention. Research to better understand the mechanisms of physical activity behaviour change maintenance will help the design of future interventions. Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN17975376. This project was funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Public Health Research programme and will be published in full in Public Health Research; Vol. 7, No. 15. See the NIHR Journals Library website for further project information.
鼓励上班族进行体育活动的忠诚度计划:集群随机对照试验
通过减少缺勤和提高生产力,增加工作场所的体育活动可以为员工的身心健康带来好处,也可以为雇主带来经济利益。然而,关于在工作场所环境中采取有效的行为改变干预措施以保持身体活动的证据有限。这项研究旨在解决这一差距,并为有效和具有成本效益的工作场所干预措施提供证据基础。为了确定体育活动忠诚度计划的有效性和成本效益,这是一种基于与商业街忠诚度卡相似概念的多成分干预措施,旨在鼓励习惯性体育活动行为并保持每天平均步数的增加。一项包含嵌入式经济评估、行为经济实验、中介分析和过程评估的集群随机对照试验。来自北爱尔兰贝尔法斯特和利斯本市中心公共部门组织的办公室员工。共有853名参与者[平均年龄43.6岁(标准差9.6岁);71%的参与者为女性]被分组随机分配到干预组或(等待名单)对照组。为期6个月的干预包括经济激励(零售券)、反馈和其他循证行为改变技术。位于工作场所附近的传感器使参与者能够监测他们累积的身体活动分钟数。主要结果是使用密封式计步器(Yamax Digiwalker CW-701;Yamax,Tasley,UK)记录每天的平均步数,该计步器在干预后连续7天和6个月和12个月佩戴在腰部。次要结果包括健康、心理健康、生活质量、旷工和出勤以及医疗资源的使用。干预组的平均每天步数显著低于对照组[分别为6990步/天(标准差3078)和7576步/天的平均步数(标准差3345)],调整后的平均差为-336步(95%置信区间为-612至-60步;p = 0.02),但在基线后12个月时没有显著降低。干预组的心理健康有小幅但显著的改善(Warwick–Edinburgh心理健康量表各组之间的差异为1.34分,95%置信区间为0.48-2.20分),但其他次要结果没有改善。一项经济评估表明,总体而言,与没有干预相比,该计划不具有成本效益。每个参与者的干预成本比没有干预高25.85英镑(95%置信区间为29.89至81.60英镑),并且对质量调整后的生命年没有影响(增量质量调整后生命年为0.0000891,95%可信区间为0.008至0.008)。研究期间参与组织的重大重组导致招募人数低于预期以及保留率。技术问题影响了干预的保真度。总体而言,与等待名单对照组相比,分配到干预组导致6个月时计步器测量的平均每日步数相对于基线略有但显著下降。与没有干预相比,体育活动忠诚度计划被认为不具有成本效益,主要是因为通过干预没有获得额外的质量调整生命年。更好地了解体育活动行为改变维持机制的研究将有助于设计未来的干预措施。当前对照试验ISRCTN17975376。该项目由国家卫生研究所公共卫生研究计划资助,并将在《公共卫生研究》上全文发表;第7卷第15期。有关更多项目信息,请访问NIHR期刊图书馆网站。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
11
审稿时长
46 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信