THE LEGALITY OF CANING IN SINGAPORE

Q3 Social Sciences
Harsh Mahaseth, Shifa Qureshi
{"title":"THE LEGALITY OF CANING IN SINGAPORE","authors":"Harsh Mahaseth, Shifa Qureshi","doi":"10.32890/uumjls2022.13.2.3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Caning, also known as flogging and whipping, is a form of corporal punishment that is exclusively practised in Singapore, Brunei, and Malaysia. There has been an ongoing discussion over whether caning falls within the definition of ‘torture’ under various international treaties. This article intends to look into the history of caning and further analyse the arguments for the legality of caning in Singapore. It mentios the reasons for and problems of the present form of caning in these three nations. After analysing the international law and position of caning, the article affirms the reasons for not changing the existing caning laws. The efficacy of caning as punishment can be demonstrated by statistics from various reports that showed low crime rates in Singapore, Brunei, and Malaysia. Caning is among the few punishments that are retributive, deterring, as well as disciplining. The findings revealed that the offenders may not be able to walk or even sit comfortably for the first few weeks after being subjected to caning as punishment. Furthermore, the humiliation, fear, and suffering leave a permanent psychological scar on the offenders. Hence achieving the objective of judicial punishments. Nevertheless, given the lack of literature, caning has not been highlighted previously. In the final analysis, this article concluded that despite the severity and humiliation, caning still contributes to the overall aversion to crime in Singapore and thus should not be abolished and should continue to be inflicted on offenders.","PeriodicalId":37075,"journal":{"name":"UUM Journal of Legal Studies","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"UUM Journal of Legal Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32890/uumjls2022.13.2.3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Caning, also known as flogging and whipping, is a form of corporal punishment that is exclusively practised in Singapore, Brunei, and Malaysia. There has been an ongoing discussion over whether caning falls within the definition of ‘torture’ under various international treaties. This article intends to look into the history of caning and further analyse the arguments for the legality of caning in Singapore. It mentios the reasons for and problems of the present form of caning in these three nations. After analysing the international law and position of caning, the article affirms the reasons for not changing the existing caning laws. The efficacy of caning as punishment can be demonstrated by statistics from various reports that showed low crime rates in Singapore, Brunei, and Malaysia. Caning is among the few punishments that are retributive, deterring, as well as disciplining. The findings revealed that the offenders may not be able to walk or even sit comfortably for the first few weeks after being subjected to caning as punishment. Furthermore, the humiliation, fear, and suffering leave a permanent psychological scar on the offenders. Hence achieving the objective of judicial punishments. Nevertheless, given the lack of literature, caning has not been highlighted previously. In the final analysis, this article concluded that despite the severity and humiliation, caning still contributes to the overall aversion to crime in Singapore and thus should not be abolished and should continue to be inflicted on offenders.
新加坡鞭刑的合法性
Caning,也被称为鞭笞和鞭打,是一种体罚形式,只在新加坡、文莱和马来西亚实行。关于鞭刑是否属于各种国际条约下的“酷刑”定义,一直在进行讨论。本文旨在探讨鞭刑的历史,并进一步分析新加坡鞭刑合法性的争论。文中还提到了这三个国家目前鞭刑形式存在的原因和问题。本文在分析了鞭刑的国际法及其地位后,肯定了不改变现行鞭刑法律的理由。新加坡、文莱和马来西亚的犯罪率较低,各种报告的统计数据可以证明鞭刑作为惩罚的有效性。鞭刑是少数具有报复性、震慑性和惩戒性的惩罚之一。调查结果显示,在受到鞭刑的最初几周,违法者可能无法行走,甚至无法舒适地坐着。此外,羞辱、恐惧和痛苦在罪犯身上留下了永久的心理伤疤。从而达到司法处罚的目的。然而,由于文献的缺乏,鞭刑在以前没有被强调过。在最后的分析中,这篇文章的结论是,尽管严厉和羞辱,鞭刑仍然有助于新加坡人对犯罪的整体厌恶,因此不应该被废除,而应该继续对罪犯施加。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
UUM Journal of Legal Studies
UUM Journal of Legal Studies Social Sciences-Law
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
33
审稿时长
24 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信