Manual Compression of External Iliac Vein to Increase the Size of Femoral Vein for Femoral Central Venous Catheter Insertion in Small Children: Pilot Experimental Study and Randomized Trial
{"title":"Manual Compression of External Iliac Vein to Increase the Size of Femoral Vein for Femoral Central Venous Catheter Insertion in Small Children: Pilot Experimental Study and Randomized Trial","authors":"Suvikrom Law, Suwannee Phumeetham, Walaiporn Bowornkitiwong, Kawewan Limprayoon, Theerapon Jariyasakoolroj","doi":"10.2309/java-d-22-00017","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n \n \n \n Aim: Pediatric femoral central venous catheter insertion is sometimes difficult due to small vein size. External iliac vein (EIV) compression may provide a tourniquet effect to the femoral vein (FV) and may facilitate catheterization. This study was conducted to determine the effect of EIV compression on FV size and femoral venous catheterization success rates.\n Methods: This study had 2 parts. The first part was a single-arm experimental study. The second part was a randomized controlled trial. Children weighing 2.5–15.0 kg were included. First part: All patients received the same intervention and measurements. FV anteroposterior and medial-lateral diameters were measured by ultrasound without EIV compression, after which EIV was compressed using the assistant’s finger, and FV diameters were measured. Second part: Patients were randomized into compression and control groups. The compression group received EIV compression during femoral venous catheterization. The control group did not receive the compression.\n Results: A total of 30 patients (15 in each group) participated. EIV compression significantly increased FV anteroposterior diameter (3.36 ± 1.01 mm with compression, 2.39 ± 0.76 mm without compression, mean difference = 0.97 mm, 95% CI = 0.73, 1.21, P < 0.001) and medial-lateral diameter (4.58 ± 1.40 mm with compression, 3.86 ± 1.32 mm without compression, mean difference = 0.72 mm, 95% CI = 0.43, 1.01, P < 0.001). Catheterization success rates were not different between groups.\n Conclusions: EIV compression increased FV size, but the effect on femoral venous catheterization success rates was inconclusive due to a small sample size.\n","PeriodicalId":35321,"journal":{"name":"JAVA - Journal of the Association for Vascular Access","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JAVA - Journal of the Association for Vascular Access","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2309/java-d-22-00017","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Aim: Pediatric femoral central venous catheter insertion is sometimes difficult due to small vein size. External iliac vein (EIV) compression may provide a tourniquet effect to the femoral vein (FV) and may facilitate catheterization. This study was conducted to determine the effect of EIV compression on FV size and femoral venous catheterization success rates.
Methods: This study had 2 parts. The first part was a single-arm experimental study. The second part was a randomized controlled trial. Children weighing 2.5–15.0 kg were included. First part: All patients received the same intervention and measurements. FV anteroposterior and medial-lateral diameters were measured by ultrasound without EIV compression, after which EIV was compressed using the assistant’s finger, and FV diameters were measured. Second part: Patients were randomized into compression and control groups. The compression group received EIV compression during femoral venous catheterization. The control group did not receive the compression.
Results: A total of 30 patients (15 in each group) participated. EIV compression significantly increased FV anteroposterior diameter (3.36 ± 1.01 mm with compression, 2.39 ± 0.76 mm without compression, mean difference = 0.97 mm, 95% CI = 0.73, 1.21, P < 0.001) and medial-lateral diameter (4.58 ± 1.40 mm with compression, 3.86 ± 1.32 mm without compression, mean difference = 0.72 mm, 95% CI = 0.43, 1.01, P < 0.001). Catheterization success rates were not different between groups.
Conclusions: EIV compression increased FV size, but the effect on femoral venous catheterization success rates was inconclusive due to a small sample size.
目的:小儿股中心静脉导管由于静脉体积小,有时难以插入。髂外静脉(EIV)压迫可为股静脉(FV)提供止血带作用,并可促进置管。本研究旨在确定EIV压迫对FV大小和股静脉置管成功率的影响。方法:本研究分为两部分。第一部分为单臂实验研究。第二部分为随机对照试验。包括体重2.5-15.0 kg的儿童。第一部分:所有患者接受相同的干预和测量。在不压缩EIV的情况下,超声测量FV正、中外侧直径,用辅助手指压缩EIV,测量FV直径。第二部分:将患者随机分为压迫组和对照组。压迫组在股静脉置管期间接受EIV压迫。对照组不接受压缩。结果:共30例患者参与,每组15例。EIV压缩显著增加FV前后径(有压缩时为3.36±1.01 mm,无压缩时为2.39±0.76 mm,平均差值= 0.97 mm, 95% CI = 0.73, 1.21, P < 0.001)和内外侧径(有压缩时为4.58±1.40 mm,无压缩时为3.86±1.32 mm,平均差值= 0.72 mm, 95% CI = 0.43, 1.01, P < 0.001)。两组间置管成功率无差异。结论:EIV压迫增加了FV大小,但由于样本量小,对股静脉置管成功率的影响尚无定论。
期刊介绍:
The Association for Vascular Access (AVA) is an association of healthcare professionals founded in 1985 to promote the emerging vascular access specialty. Today, its multidisciplinary membership advances research, professional and public education to shape practice and enhance patient outcomes, and partners with the device manufacturing community to bring about evidence-based innovations in vascular access.