Different regulatory approaches to enhanced water protection in selected European jurisdictions

IF 1.6 4区环境科学与生态学 Q3 ENGINEERING, CIVIL

Water International Pub Date : 2023-02-17 DOI:10.1080/02508060.2023.2177052

Nicole Grmelová, A. Lähteenmäki-Uutela, P. Štěpánek

引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT This paper presents the results of the analysis of initiatives taken by selected European Union member states concerning enhanced water protection with respect to ownership and management of water resources and water distribution systems. Two of the countries studied have recently enacted their constitutional protection of water (Slovakia and Slovenia), one country is planning to reinforce the protection of water in its constitution (Czech Republic) and one state found the constitutional protection of water unnecessary (Finland). Whereas the reasons for (not) protecting water at the constitutional level vary widely, the common denominator is a strong support for protecting water as resource.

查看原文本刊更多论文

在选定的欧洲司法管辖区加强水资源保护的不同监管方法

摘要本文介绍了对选定的欧盟成员国在水资源和配水系统所有权和管理方面加强水保护的举措的分析结果。在所研究的国家中，有两个国家最近颁布了对水的宪法保护（斯洛伐克和斯洛文尼亚），一个国家计划在其宪法中加强对水的保护（捷克共和国），还有一个国家认为没有必要对水进行宪法保护（芬兰）。尽管在宪法层面上（不）保护水的原因千差万别，但共同点是大力支持将水作为资源加以保护。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Water International 工程技术-工程：土木

CiteScore

4.40

自引率

7.70%

发文量

审稿时长

6-12 weeks

期刊介绍： Water International is the official journal of the International Water Resources Association (IWRA), founded in 1972 to serve as an international gateway to the people, ideas and networks that are critical to the sustainable management of water resources around the world. Water International''s articles, state-of-the-art reviews, technical notes and other matter are policy-relevant and aimed at communicating in-depth knowledge to a multidisciplinary and international community. Water International publishes both individual contributions and thematic special issues and sections on cutting edge issues. All individual manuscript submissions are subject to initial appraisal and peer review by the Deputy Editor in Chief and the Associate Editors, and, if found suitable for further consideration, to peer review by at least one independent, anonymous expert referee. All external peer review is double blind. Thematic issues and sections are handled under comparable procedures by guest editors under the oversight of the Editor in Chief.