Enforcement of Criminal Law on Crimes of Criminal Consensus Against State Security: Learning from Indonesia

Roby Satya Nugraha, Sri Ayu Astuti
{"title":"Enforcement of Criminal Law on Crimes of Criminal Consensus Against State Security: Learning from Indonesia","authors":"Roby Satya Nugraha, Sri Ayu Astuti","doi":"10.21070/JIHR.2020.7.693","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of this legal research is to explain the first discussion, namely how to implement law enforcement against criminal conspiracy (samenspanning) which has been regulated in the Criminal Code and the Criminal Procedure Code. Second How is the imposition of sanctions for criminal conspiracy charges regulated in the Criminal Code in case Number: 293K / Pid / 2016. This type of research is normative research which is descriptive-analytical in nature, using secondary data with data collection techniques through library research and processing data qualitatively, it is concluded that law enforcement against criminal conspiracy is carried out by penal measures, penal measures are one of the efforts to enforce the law or all actions taken by law enforcement officials that focus more on eradication after a crime is committed under criminal law, namely criminal sanctions which constitute a threat to the perpetrator. The stages in this way include investigation, further investigation, prosecution, and so on, which in this case is part of criminal politics. The functionalization of criminal law is an effort to tackle crime through rational criminal law enforcement with the aim of creating the fulfillment of a sense of justice and efficiency. The imposition of sanctions Criminal sanctions imposed if a person has been proven to have committed a criminal act of treason can be punished with a criminal sentence contained in Article 106 of the Criminal Code with the threat of life imprisonment or twenty years in prison.","PeriodicalId":31020,"journal":{"name":"Rechtsidee","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rechtsidee","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21070/JIHR.2020.7.693","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The purpose of this legal research is to explain the first discussion, namely how to implement law enforcement against criminal conspiracy (samenspanning) which has been regulated in the Criminal Code and the Criminal Procedure Code. Second How is the imposition of sanctions for criminal conspiracy charges regulated in the Criminal Code in case Number: 293K / Pid / 2016. This type of research is normative research which is descriptive-analytical in nature, using secondary data with data collection techniques through library research and processing data qualitatively, it is concluded that law enforcement against criminal conspiracy is carried out by penal measures, penal measures are one of the efforts to enforce the law or all actions taken by law enforcement officials that focus more on eradication after a crime is committed under criminal law, namely criminal sanctions which constitute a threat to the perpetrator. The stages in this way include investigation, further investigation, prosecution, and so on, which in this case is part of criminal politics. The functionalization of criminal law is an effort to tackle crime through rational criminal law enforcement with the aim of creating the fulfillment of a sense of justice and efficiency. The imposition of sanctions Criminal sanctions imposed if a person has been proven to have committed a criminal act of treason can be punished with a criminal sentence contained in Article 106 of the Criminal Code with the threat of life imprisonment or twenty years in prison.
关于危害国家安全的刑事共识犯罪的刑法实施——以印度尼西亚为例
本法律研究的目的是解释第一个讨论,即如何实施《刑法》和《刑事诉讼法》规定的打击共谋犯罪的执法。第二,案件编号:293K/Pid/2016,《刑法》如何规定对共谋犯罪指控的制裁。这类研究是规范性研究,本质上是描述性分析,通过图书馆研究和定性处理数据,利用二次数据和数据收集技术,得出结论,打击犯罪阴谋的执法是通过刑事措施进行的,刑事措施是执法人员为执行法律或采取的所有行动所做的努力之一,根据刑法,在犯罪后,即对犯罪者构成威胁的刑事制裁,更侧重于根除犯罪。这种方式的阶段包括调查、进一步调查、起诉等,在本案中,这是犯罪政治的一部分。刑法功能化是通过合理的刑事执法来打击犯罪,目的是创造正义感和效率感。实施制裁如果一个人被证明犯有叛国罪,则可处以《刑法》第106条所载的刑事判决,并威胁终身监禁或二十年监禁。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
2
审稿时长
5 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信