Forest-degrading behaviour among a group of Nigerian farmers: an application of the health belief model

IF 1.1 Q3 SOCIOLOGY
F. Ibrahim, B. Osikabor, Bolanle Tawakalitu Olatunji, Grace Oluwatobi Ogunwale
{"title":"Forest-degrading behaviour among a group of Nigerian farmers: an application of the health belief model","authors":"F. Ibrahim, B. Osikabor, Bolanle Tawakalitu Olatunji, Grace Oluwatobi Ogunwale","doi":"10.1080/10371656.2023.2209348","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This article investigates what predicts forest-clearing behaviour in Nigeria. Data was collected using a structured questionnaire among 320 randomly selected crop farmers in Afijio, Oyo state, in southwestern Nigeria. Stepwise, multiple linear regression was used to identify the predictors of forest-clearing behaviour. Six variables, derived from a health belief model, determined the prediction of forest-clearing. Results indicate that “perceived barriers’ was the best predictor. “Cues to action”, “perceived benefit” and “perceived severity” were also good predictors of forest-clearing behaviour. The four constructs correlated with behaviour and explained 20.2% of the variance. Robust perception of barriers to conserving forests and perceived benefit derivable from such conservation aggravates forest degradation. In contrast, the intensity of cues that stimulate forest conservation and the severity of peoples’ perception regarding the severity of forest clearing, alleviates forest-clearing. Thus, pursuing forest conservation while invoking these variables is promising for reducing forest-clearing in Nigeria.","PeriodicalId":45685,"journal":{"name":"Rural Society","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rural Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10371656.2023.2209348","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SOCIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT This article investigates what predicts forest-clearing behaviour in Nigeria. Data was collected using a structured questionnaire among 320 randomly selected crop farmers in Afijio, Oyo state, in southwestern Nigeria. Stepwise, multiple linear regression was used to identify the predictors of forest-clearing behaviour. Six variables, derived from a health belief model, determined the prediction of forest-clearing. Results indicate that “perceived barriers’ was the best predictor. “Cues to action”, “perceived benefit” and “perceived severity” were also good predictors of forest-clearing behaviour. The four constructs correlated with behaviour and explained 20.2% of the variance. Robust perception of barriers to conserving forests and perceived benefit derivable from such conservation aggravates forest degradation. In contrast, the intensity of cues that stimulate forest conservation and the severity of peoples’ perception regarding the severity of forest clearing, alleviates forest-clearing. Thus, pursuing forest conservation while invoking these variables is promising for reducing forest-clearing in Nigeria.
尼日利亚一群农民的森林退化行为:健康信念模型的应用
摘要本文调查了尼日利亚森林砍伐行为的预测因素。数据是使用结构化问卷在尼日利亚西南部奥约州阿菲焦的320名随机选择的种植户中收集的。逐步使用多元线性回归来确定森林砍伐行为的预测因素。根据健康信念模型得出的六个变量决定了森林砍伐的预测。结果表明,“感知障碍”是最佳的预测因子。“行动提示”、“感知效益”和“感知严重程度”也是森林砍伐行为的良好预测因子。这四个结构与行为相关,解释了20.2%的方差。对保护森林的障碍和从这种保护中获得的利益的强烈看法加剧了森林退化。相反,刺激森林保护的线索的强度和人们对森林砍伐严重性的看法的严重性,缓解了森林砍伐。因此,在援引这些变量的同时进行森林保护,有望减少尼日利亚的森林砍伐。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Rural Society
Rural Society SOCIOLOGY-
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
12
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信