Making Sense of Fragmented Bodies across Generations: Tamas and Kitne Pakistan

IF 0.1 0 LITERATURE
Jey Sushil
{"title":"Making Sense of Fragmented Bodies across Generations: Tamas and Kitne Pakistan","authors":"Jey Sushil","doi":"10.24193/mjcst.2022.14.05","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"What is the real extent of 75 years when discussing a traumatic event like the Partition of 1947, at least in fiction? In a bid to explore this, the article analyzes two Hindi novels divided by a span of 27 years: the first, Bhisham Sahni’s Tamas (1973), was considered an early and now classic fictional intervention (though late by the standards of some other Indian languages, such as Urdu and Punjabi) in the narratives of Partition, and the other, Kamleshwar’s Kitne Pakistan (2000), was published at the cusp of the new millennium. Much had changed in India over those three decades. Did these changes brought about by globalization, liberalization, and new technology also influence the representation of violence, communalism, and relationships between communities, maybe even an understanding of the causes of the Partition? While examining the differences in narration of time and space, as well as stylistic divergences, the article notes and highlights the different ways in which both the novels lack a hero and deals with the idea of hope and utopia that is read in the context of violence during Partition/Partitions.","PeriodicalId":36476,"journal":{"name":"Metacritic Journal for Comparative Studies and Theory","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Metacritic Journal for Comparative Studies and Theory","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24193/mjcst.2022.14.05","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LITERATURE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

What is the real extent of 75 years when discussing a traumatic event like the Partition of 1947, at least in fiction? In a bid to explore this, the article analyzes two Hindi novels divided by a span of 27 years: the first, Bhisham Sahni’s Tamas (1973), was considered an early and now classic fictional intervention (though late by the standards of some other Indian languages, such as Urdu and Punjabi) in the narratives of Partition, and the other, Kamleshwar’s Kitne Pakistan (2000), was published at the cusp of the new millennium. Much had changed in India over those three decades. Did these changes brought about by globalization, liberalization, and new technology also influence the representation of violence, communalism, and relationships between communities, maybe even an understanding of the causes of the Partition? While examining the differences in narration of time and space, as well as stylistic divergences, the article notes and highlights the different ways in which both the novels lack a hero and deals with the idea of hope and utopia that is read in the context of violence during Partition/Partitions.
解读几代人支离破碎的身体:Tamas和Kitne巴基斯坦
至少在小说中,当讨论1947年分治这样的创伤性事件时,75年的真实程度是多少?为了探索这一点,本文分析了两部相隔27年的印地语小说:第一部是比沙姆·萨尼的《塔玛斯》(1973年),被认为是分治叙事中早期且现在是经典的虚构干预(尽管按照其他一些印度语言的标准,如乌尔都语和旁遮普语),另一部是卡姆莱什瓦尔的《巴基斯坦的风筝》(2000年),是在新千年即将到来之际出版的。在过去的三十年里,印度发生了很大的变化。全球化、自由化和新技术带来的这些变化是否也影响了暴力、社群主义和社区之间关系的表现,甚至可能影响了对分治原因的理解?在考察时间和空间叙事的差异以及风格差异的同时,文章注意到并强调了两部小说都缺乏英雄的不同方式,以及在分治/分治期间暴力背景下阅读的希望和乌托邦的不同方式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Metacritic Journal for Comparative Studies and Theory
Metacritic Journal for Comparative Studies and Theory Arts and Humanities-Arts and Humanities (all)
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
15
审稿时长
7 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信