Archives in the stacks: documentary editions in collections

IF 1.3 Q3 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE
R. B. Riter
{"title":"Archives in the stacks: documentary editions in collections","authors":"R. B. Riter","doi":"10.1108/cc-04-2019-0009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nThis paper aims to investigate the role of documentary editions in supporting the development of historical collections in libraries, their function as evidential and informational objects and considerations for their evaluation in collection development. Framed as objects possessing bibliographic and archival characteristics, attention is given to the evaluative challenges these objects present during collection development.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nThis paper provides an archival and bibliographic analysis of documentary editions through examining and discussing their archival and bibliographic elements. Consideration is given to how these elements are expressed as information and evidence, how they operate as scholarly and archive-like objects and how they acquire value as collected objects. This approach clarifies the informational and evidential characteristics of these works, offering a framework for their evaluation in libraries.\n\n\nFindings\nDocumentary editions possess archival and bibliographic characteristics, requiring that evaluators critique the scholarly value and archival integrity of their content. This has implications for the curation of archival objects in library collections, where library and archival expertise can support a more nuanced assessment of these works.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nThe blurred documentary character of these works has been identified by scholars (Cox, 1991). This paper presents evaluative considerations. Here, these characteristics are clarified, and an approach for evaluating these works is offered.\n","PeriodicalId":41029,"journal":{"name":"Collection and Curation","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2019-08-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1108/cc-04-2019-0009","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Collection and Curation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/cc-04-2019-0009","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Purpose This paper aims to investigate the role of documentary editions in supporting the development of historical collections in libraries, their function as evidential and informational objects and considerations for their evaluation in collection development. Framed as objects possessing bibliographic and archival characteristics, attention is given to the evaluative challenges these objects present during collection development. Design/methodology/approach This paper provides an archival and bibliographic analysis of documentary editions through examining and discussing their archival and bibliographic elements. Consideration is given to how these elements are expressed as information and evidence, how they operate as scholarly and archive-like objects and how they acquire value as collected objects. This approach clarifies the informational and evidential characteristics of these works, offering a framework for their evaluation in libraries. Findings Documentary editions possess archival and bibliographic characteristics, requiring that evaluators critique the scholarly value and archival integrity of their content. This has implications for the curation of archival objects in library collections, where library and archival expertise can support a more nuanced assessment of these works. Originality/value The blurred documentary character of these works has been identified by scholars (Cox, 1991). This paper presents evaluative considerations. Here, these characteristics are clarified, and an approach for evaluating these works is offered.
书库中的档案:文集中的纪实版本
本文旨在探讨文献版在支持图书馆历史馆藏建设中的作用,文献版作为证据和信息对象的功能,以及文献版在馆藏建设中的评价考虑。作为具有书目和档案特征的对象,关注这些对象在收藏发展过程中存在的评估挑战。设计/方法/途径本文通过考察和讨论文献版本的档案和书目要素,对文献版本进行档案和书目分析。考虑到这些元素如何作为信息和证据表达,它们如何作为学术和档案类对象运作,以及它们如何作为收集对象获得价值。这种方法澄清了这些作品的信息和证据特征,为图书馆的评估提供了一个框架。文献版本具有档案和书目特征,要求评价者批判其内容的学术价值和档案完整性。这对图书馆馆藏档案物品的管理有影响,图书馆和档案专业知识可以支持对这些作品进行更细致入微的评估。独创性/价值这些作品的模糊纪实特征已经被学者们确认(Cox, 1991)。本文提出了评价考虑。本文对这些特点进行了阐述,并提出了一种评价这些作品的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Collection and Curation
Collection and Curation INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE-
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
8
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书