Outcomes With a Mobile Digital Health Platform for Patients Undergoing Spine Surgery: Retrospective Analysis

Vishal Venkatraman, Elayna P Kirsch, Emily Luo, Sameer Kunte, M. Ponder, Z. Gellad, Beiyu Liu, Hui-Jie Lee, S. Jung, M. Haglund, S. Lad
{"title":"Outcomes With a Mobile Digital Health Platform for Patients Undergoing Spine Surgery: Retrospective Analysis","authors":"Vishal Venkatraman, Elayna P Kirsch, Emily Luo, Sameer Kunte, M. Ponder, Z. Gellad, Beiyu Liu, Hui-Jie Lee, S. Jung, M. Haglund, S. Lad","doi":"10.2196/38690","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background Digital health solutions have been shown to enhance outcomes for individuals with chronic medical illnesses, but few have been validated for surgical patients. The digital health platform ManageMySurgery (MMS) has been validated for spine surgery as a feasible method for patients along their surgical journey through in-app education and completion of patient-reported outcomes surveys. Objective The aim of this study is to determine the rates of 90-day emergency room (ER) visits, readmissions, and complications in patients undergoing spine surgery using MMS compared to patients using traditional perioperative care alone. Methods Patients undergoing spine surgery at a US-based academic hospital were invited to use MMS perioperatively between December 2017 and September 2021. All patients received standard perioperative care and were classified as MMS users if they logged into the app. Demographic information and 90-day outcomes were acquired via electronic health record review. The odds ratios of having 90-day ER visits, readmissions, mild complications, and severe complications between the MMS and non-MMS groups were estimated using logistic regression models. Results A total of 1015 patients were invited, with 679 using MMS. MMS users and nonusers had similar demographics: the average ages were 57.9 (SD 12.5) years and 61.5 (SD 12.7) years, 54.1% (367/679) and 47.3% (159/336) were male, and 90.1% (612/679) and 88.7% (298/336) had commercial or Medicare insurance, respectively. Cervical fusions (559/1015, 55.07%) and single-approach lumbar fusions (231/1015, 22.76%) were the most common procedures for all patients. MMS users had a lower 90-day readmission rate (55/679, 8.1%) than did nonusers (30/336, 8.9%). Mild complications (MMS: 56/679, 8.3%; non-MMS: 32/336, 9.5%) and severe complications (MMS: 66/679, 9.7%; non-MMS: 43/336, 12.8%) were also lower in MMS users. MMS users had a lower 90-day ER visit rate (MMS: 62/679, 9.1%; non-MMS: 45/336, 13.4%). After adjustments were made for age and sex, the odds of having 90-day ER visits for MMS users were 32% lower than those for nonusers, but this difference was not statistically significant (odds ratio 0.68, 95% CI 0.45-1.02; P=.06). Conclusions This is one of the first studies to show differences in acute outcomes for people undergoing spine surgery who use a digital health app. This study found a correlation between MMS use and fewer postsurgical ER visits in a large group of spine surgery patients. A planned randomized controlled trial will provide additional evidence of whether this digital health tool can be used as an intervention to improve patient outcomes.","PeriodicalId":73557,"journal":{"name":"JMIR perioperative medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JMIR perioperative medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2196/38690","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background Digital health solutions have been shown to enhance outcomes for individuals with chronic medical illnesses, but few have been validated for surgical patients. The digital health platform ManageMySurgery (MMS) has been validated for spine surgery as a feasible method for patients along their surgical journey through in-app education and completion of patient-reported outcomes surveys. Objective The aim of this study is to determine the rates of 90-day emergency room (ER) visits, readmissions, and complications in patients undergoing spine surgery using MMS compared to patients using traditional perioperative care alone. Methods Patients undergoing spine surgery at a US-based academic hospital were invited to use MMS perioperatively between December 2017 and September 2021. All patients received standard perioperative care and were classified as MMS users if they logged into the app. Demographic information and 90-day outcomes were acquired via electronic health record review. The odds ratios of having 90-day ER visits, readmissions, mild complications, and severe complications between the MMS and non-MMS groups were estimated using logistic regression models. Results A total of 1015 patients were invited, with 679 using MMS. MMS users and nonusers had similar demographics: the average ages were 57.9 (SD 12.5) years and 61.5 (SD 12.7) years, 54.1% (367/679) and 47.3% (159/336) were male, and 90.1% (612/679) and 88.7% (298/336) had commercial or Medicare insurance, respectively. Cervical fusions (559/1015, 55.07%) and single-approach lumbar fusions (231/1015, 22.76%) were the most common procedures for all patients. MMS users had a lower 90-day readmission rate (55/679, 8.1%) than did nonusers (30/336, 8.9%). Mild complications (MMS: 56/679, 8.3%; non-MMS: 32/336, 9.5%) and severe complications (MMS: 66/679, 9.7%; non-MMS: 43/336, 12.8%) were also lower in MMS users. MMS users had a lower 90-day ER visit rate (MMS: 62/679, 9.1%; non-MMS: 45/336, 13.4%). After adjustments were made for age and sex, the odds of having 90-day ER visits for MMS users were 32% lower than those for nonusers, but this difference was not statistically significant (odds ratio 0.68, 95% CI 0.45-1.02; P=.06). Conclusions This is one of the first studies to show differences in acute outcomes for people undergoing spine surgery who use a digital health app. This study found a correlation between MMS use and fewer postsurgical ER visits in a large group of spine surgery patients. A planned randomized controlled trial will provide additional evidence of whether this digital health tool can be used as an intervention to improve patient outcomes.
脊柱手术患者使用移动数字健康平台的结果:回顾性分析
背景数字健康解决方案已被证明可以提高慢性疾病患者的治疗效果,但很少有人能对外科患者进行验证。通过应用内教育和完成患者报告的结果调查,数字健康平台ManageMySurgery(MMS)已被验证为脊柱手术的可行方法。目的本研究的目的是确定使用MMS进行脊柱手术的患者与单独使用传统围手术期护理的患者相比,90天急诊室(ER)就诊率、再次入院率和并发症。方法在2017年12月至2021年9月期间,邀请在美国一家学术医院接受脊柱手术的患者在围手术期使用MMS。所有患者都接受了标准的围手术期护理,如果登录该应用程序,则被归类为MMS用户。通过电子健康记录审查获得人口统计信息和90天结果。使用逻辑回归模型估计MMS组和非MMS组之间90天急诊就诊、再次入院、轻度并发症和严重并发症的比值比。结果共邀请1015名患者,其中679名患者使用MMS。MMS用户和非用户的人口统计数据相似:平均年龄分别为57.9岁(SD 12.5)和61.5岁(SD 12.7),54.1%(367/679)和47.3%(159/336)为男性,90.1%(612/679)或88.7%(298/336)拥有商业或医疗保险。宫颈融合术(559/1015,55.07%)和单路腰椎融合术(231/1015,22.76%)是所有患者最常见的手术。MMS用户的90天再入院率(55/679,8.1%)低于非MMS用户(30/336,8.9%)。MMS用户的轻度并发症(MMS:56/679,8.3%;非MMS:32/336,9.5%)和严重并发症(MMS:66/679,9.7%;非MMS:43/336,12.8%)也较低。MMS用户的90天急诊就诊率较低(MMS:62/679,9.1%;非MMS:45/336,13.4%)。在对年龄和性别进行调整后,MMS用户进行90天急诊的几率比非MMS用户低32%,但这种差异在统计学上并不显著(比值比0.68,95%CI 0.45-1.02;P=0.06)。结论这是第一批显示使用数字健康应用程序进行脊柱手术的患者急性结局差异的研究之一。这项研究发现,在一大群脊柱手术患者中,MMS的使用与术后急诊就诊次数减少之间存在相关性。一项计划中的随机对照试验将提供额外的证据,证明这种数字健康工具是否可以用作改善患者预后的干预措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信