Planning and implementation of event leveraging strategy: China’s legacy pledge to motivate 300 million people to be involved in winter sport

IF 3.7 1区 教育学 Q1 HOSPITALITY, LEISURE, SPORT & TOURISM
Shushu Chen, Xiaoyan Xing, L. Chalip
{"title":"Planning and implementation of event leveraging strategy: China’s legacy pledge to motivate 300 million people to be involved in winter sport","authors":"Shushu Chen, Xiaoyan Xing, L. Chalip","doi":"10.1080/14413523.2021.1987737","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This paper examines China’s planning and implementation of leveraging, using the Beijing 2022 Olympic and Paralympic Winter Games, to achieve the winter sport participation legacy of 300 million people involved in winter sport. Drawing upon interviews and documentary data, the authors findings reveal that the planning of the leveraging programme, which was politically motivated, was a centralised and government-led bid to stimulate participation and consumption within China’s winter sport industry. The leveraging programme also served broader economic, social, and political state agendas. The main implementation pathway relied heavily on the existing structures for the provision of sport and education, and, due to a lack of state resources (or facilities), support was sought from the private sector. This study further suggests that state interference to steer the direction and development of leveraging might have served as a double-edged sword: On the one hand, it provided much government-led impetus for goal setting across sectors and departments, directing extensive cooperative efforts and resources towards leveraging. On the other hand, it might not have been the most sustainable approach for increasing participation, due to the overreliance on top-down implementation and short-term policy interventions. HIGHLIGHTS The 300 Million Programme is an indicator for measuring the success of the 2022 Beijing Olympic Games. The planning and implementation of the 300 Million Programme has been an iterative process. The leveraging process is both propelled and confined by contextual features (political and cultural). State-led leveraging exerts a significant influence on resource mobilisation, goal alignment and cross-sector coordination. The sustainability of the participation legacy remains uncertain.","PeriodicalId":48057,"journal":{"name":"Sport Management Review","volume":"25 1","pages":"771 - 790"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sport Management Review","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14413523.2021.1987737","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HOSPITALITY, LEISURE, SPORT & TOURISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

ABSTRACT This paper examines China’s planning and implementation of leveraging, using the Beijing 2022 Olympic and Paralympic Winter Games, to achieve the winter sport participation legacy of 300 million people involved in winter sport. Drawing upon interviews and documentary data, the authors findings reveal that the planning of the leveraging programme, which was politically motivated, was a centralised and government-led bid to stimulate participation and consumption within China’s winter sport industry. The leveraging programme also served broader economic, social, and political state agendas. The main implementation pathway relied heavily on the existing structures for the provision of sport and education, and, due to a lack of state resources (or facilities), support was sought from the private sector. This study further suggests that state interference to steer the direction and development of leveraging might have served as a double-edged sword: On the one hand, it provided much government-led impetus for goal setting across sectors and departments, directing extensive cooperative efforts and resources towards leveraging. On the other hand, it might not have been the most sustainable approach for increasing participation, due to the overreliance on top-down implementation and short-term policy interventions. HIGHLIGHTS The 300 Million Programme is an indicator for measuring the success of the 2022 Beijing Olympic Games. The planning and implementation of the 300 Million Programme has been an iterative process. The leveraging process is both propelled and confined by contextual features (political and cultural). State-led leveraging exerts a significant influence on resource mobilisation, goal alignment and cross-sector coordination. The sustainability of the participation legacy remains uncertain.
赛事撬动战略的规划与实施:中国承诺动员3亿人参与冬季运动
摘要本文考察了中国利用北京2022年冬奥会和冬残奥会,实现3亿人参与冬季运动的计划和实施情况。根据采访和文献数据,作者的研究结果表明,出于政治动机,杠杆计划的规划是一项集中的、政府主导的努力,旨在刺激中国冬季体育产业的参与和消费。杠杆计划还服务于更广泛的经济、社会和政治国家议程。主要的实施途径在很大程度上依赖于提供体育和教育的现有结构,由于缺乏国家资源(或设施),寻求私营部门的支持。这项研究进一步表明,国家干预引导杠杆作用的方向和发展可能是一把双刃剑:一方面,它为跨部门和部门的目标制定提供了很大的政府主导动力,将广泛的合作努力和资源导向杠杆作用。另一方面,由于过度依赖自上而下的执行和短期政策干预,这可能不是增加参与的最可持续的方法。亮点3亿计划是衡量2022年北京奥运会成功与否的指标。3亿方案的规划和实施是一个反复的过程。杠杆作用过程既受背景特征(政治和文化)的推动,也受背景特征的限制。国家主导的杠杆作用对资源调动、目标调整和跨部门协调产生重大影响。参与遗产的可持续性仍然不确定。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.00
自引率
7.30%
发文量
27
期刊介绍: Sport Management Review is published as a service to sport industries worldwide. It is a multidisciplinary journal concerned with the management, marketing, and governance of sport at all levels and in all its manifestations -- whether as an entertainment, a recreation, or an occupation. The journal encourages collaboration between scholars and practitioners. It welcomes submissions reporting research, new applications, advances in theory, and case studies. The language of publication is English. Submissions are peer reviewed.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信