Understanding post-crisis trauma recovery for the past decade in uniformed services: a narrative review

IF 1 Q4 PSYCHIATRY
Raneesha De Silva, J. Ireland, Philip Birch, C. Ireland, Michael Lewis, R. Dissanayake, M. Atapattu
{"title":"Understanding post-crisis trauma recovery for the past decade in uniformed services: a narrative review","authors":"Raneesha De Silva, J. Ireland, Philip Birch, C. Ireland, Michael Lewis, R. Dissanayake, M. Atapattu","doi":"10.1108/mhrj-11-2021-0081","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nThe purpose of this study is to explore mental health difficulties, including risk and protective factors, which may impact on symptom severity after exposure to crisis situations (war, terrorism and/or natural disasters), among first responders from uniformed services.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nPeer-reviewed journal articles published in English between January 2012 and March 2022 were searched in ProQuest, Wiley, Google Scholar and PubMed databases. In total, 12 articles were obtained from an original screening of 94,058 articles. Full article texts were screened for content and quality by two reviewers, with high agreeability.\n\n\nFindings\nPost-traumatic stress disorder and depression were the most common diagnoses. Risk factors identified were pre-deployment factors of overweight, low cognitive ability and social support, existing emotional difficulties, negative childhood experiences and stressful life events; during crisis situations factors of higher frequency and subjective severity of combat, increased rates of combat stress reaction, high levels of concerns for life and family, more stressful mission position, threat of death/severe injury and high rate of killing the enemy; and post-deployment factors, such as low social support and physical health, lack of coping mechanisms and use of avoidance strategies and social stigma. Protective factors increasing resilience and lessening symptom severity were reported as pre-deployment cognitive ability, high social support, stable physical health, effective coping, post-traumatic growth and high levels of perceived adequacy in pre-deployment preparation and training. In addition to main findings, data about author(s), publication type, population, age, type of crisis and evaluation measures were extracted. Key findings and related theories, gaps in literature and recommendations are discussed.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nAs yet, however, research into the factors that could serve as risk and/or protective factors are not clearly indicated in terms of post-crisis recovery. As per the authors’ knowledge, this study is an initial approach to considering this area.\n","PeriodicalId":45687,"journal":{"name":"Mental Health Review Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Mental Health Review Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/mhrj-11-2021-0081","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose The purpose of this study is to explore mental health difficulties, including risk and protective factors, which may impact on symptom severity after exposure to crisis situations (war, terrorism and/or natural disasters), among first responders from uniformed services. Design/methodology/approach Peer-reviewed journal articles published in English between January 2012 and March 2022 were searched in ProQuest, Wiley, Google Scholar and PubMed databases. In total, 12 articles were obtained from an original screening of 94,058 articles. Full article texts were screened for content and quality by two reviewers, with high agreeability. Findings Post-traumatic stress disorder and depression were the most common diagnoses. Risk factors identified were pre-deployment factors of overweight, low cognitive ability and social support, existing emotional difficulties, negative childhood experiences and stressful life events; during crisis situations factors of higher frequency and subjective severity of combat, increased rates of combat stress reaction, high levels of concerns for life and family, more stressful mission position, threat of death/severe injury and high rate of killing the enemy; and post-deployment factors, such as low social support and physical health, lack of coping mechanisms and use of avoidance strategies and social stigma. Protective factors increasing resilience and lessening symptom severity were reported as pre-deployment cognitive ability, high social support, stable physical health, effective coping, post-traumatic growth and high levels of perceived adequacy in pre-deployment preparation and training. In addition to main findings, data about author(s), publication type, population, age, type of crisis and evaluation measures were extracted. Key findings and related theories, gaps in literature and recommendations are discussed. Originality/value As yet, however, research into the factors that could serve as risk and/or protective factors are not clearly indicated in terms of post-crisis recovery. As per the authors’ knowledge, this study is an initial approach to considering this area.
了解过去十年军警部门的危机后创伤恢复:叙述性回顾
目的本研究的目的是探讨军警部门的急救人员在暴露于危机情况(战争、恐怖主义和/或自然灾害)后可能影响症状严重程度的心理健康困难,包括风险和保护因素。在ProQuest、Wiley、Google Scholar和PubMed数据库中搜索2012年1月至2022年3月期间以英语发表的同行评审期刊文章。从94058篇文章的原始筛选中总共获得12篇文章。两位评审员对全文的内容和质量进行了筛选,具有很高的可接受性。发现创伤后应激障碍和抑郁症是最常见的诊断。确定的风险因素是部署前超重、认知能力和社会支持低、现有的情绪困难、消极的童年经历和紧张的生活事件等因素;在危机情况下,作战频率和主观严重性更高、作战应激反应率增加、对生命和家庭的高度关注、任务位置压力更大、死亡/重伤威胁和高杀敌率等因素;以及部署后的因素,如社会支持和身体健康水平低、缺乏应对机制以及使用回避策略和社会污名化。据报道,提高复原力和减轻症状严重程度的保护因素包括部署前的认知能力、高社会支持、稳定的身体健康、有效的应对、创伤后的成长以及部署前准备和训练中的高度充分性。除主要发现外,还提取了有关作者、出版物类型、人口、年龄、危机类型和评估措施的数据。讨论了主要发现和相关理论、文献空白和建议。原创性/价值然而,对可能成为风险和/或保护因素的因素的研究尚未明确表明危机后复苏的意义。据作者所知,本研究是考虑这一领域的初步方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
8.30%
发文量
32
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信