‘Exclusionary welfarism’: a new programmatic agenda for populist right-wing parties?

IF 2 3区 社会学 Q1 POLITICAL SCIENCE
M. Jessoula, M. Natili, E. Pavolini
{"title":"‘Exclusionary welfarism’: a new programmatic agenda for populist right-wing parties?","authors":"M. Jessoula, M. Natili, E. Pavolini","doi":"10.1080/13569775.2021.2011644","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This article introduces a novel analytical framework to compare the changing positions of five populist right-wing parties in the field of welfare policies. Results outline that a novel programmatic approach on the socio economic dimension materialised, which clearly departs from traditional right wing ideologies. We call it ‘exclusionary welfarism’, characterised by (i) high salience of welfare issues, (ii) strong support for welfare state expansion, (iii) low support for the role of the market in welfare provision and (iv) the adoption of a chauvinistic stance in social policies. Furthermore, different profiles of exclusionary populist parties emerge. In fact, if both the salience of welfare issues and welfare chauvinism are shared across all parties’ manifestos considered here, the analysis shows high heterogeneity and varieties of exclusionary populist approaches among populist right-wing parties for what concerns the roles of the two main institutional spheres in welfare provision: state and market.","PeriodicalId":51673,"journal":{"name":"Contemporary Politics","volume":"28 1","pages":"447 - 468"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Contemporary Politics","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13569775.2021.2011644","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

ABSTRACT This article introduces a novel analytical framework to compare the changing positions of five populist right-wing parties in the field of welfare policies. Results outline that a novel programmatic approach on the socio economic dimension materialised, which clearly departs from traditional right wing ideologies. We call it ‘exclusionary welfarism’, characterised by (i) high salience of welfare issues, (ii) strong support for welfare state expansion, (iii) low support for the role of the market in welfare provision and (iv) the adoption of a chauvinistic stance in social policies. Furthermore, different profiles of exclusionary populist parties emerge. In fact, if both the salience of welfare issues and welfare chauvinism are shared across all parties’ manifestos considered here, the analysis shows high heterogeneity and varieties of exclusionary populist approaches among populist right-wing parties for what concerns the roles of the two main institutional spheres in welfare provision: state and market.
“排外福利主义”:民粹主义右翼政党的新纲领?
本文引入了一个新的分析框架来比较五个民粹主义右翼政党在福利政策领域的立场变化。结果表明,在社会经济维度上,一种新的纲领性方法得以实现,这明显有别于传统的右翼意识形态。我们称之为“排他性福利主义”,其特点是:(1)福利问题的高度突出,(2)大力支持福利国家的扩张,(3)对市场在福利提供中的作用的支持较低,以及(4)在社会政策中采取沙文主义立场。此外,排他性民粹主义政党出现了不同的形象。事实上,如果福利问题的突出性和福利沙文主义在这里考虑的所有政党的宣言中都是共享的,那么分析表明,民粹主义右翼政党在涉及福利提供的两个主要制度领域:国家和市场的角色时,排他性民粹主义方法的高度异质性和多样性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Contemporary Politics
Contemporary Politics POLITICAL SCIENCE-
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
10.00%
发文量
21
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信