Comparison of Application of AERMOD and ISCST3 Models for Simulating the Dispersion of Emitted Pollutant from the Stack of an Industrial Plant in Different Time Scales

Mehrshad Bajoghli
{"title":"Comparison of Application of AERMOD and ISCST3 Models for Simulating the Dispersion of Emitted Pollutant from the Stack of an Industrial Plant in Different Time Scales","authors":"Mehrshad Bajoghli","doi":"10.18502/AOH.V3I1.342","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: One of the main parts of air quality management is known as modeling of atmospheric pollutants. In this regards, simultaneous application of several models in a project and comparing the results obtained from these models could have been a considerable contribution to air quality managers for taking a more efficient decision. Methods: In this study, the stack of an industrial plant in the southwest of Isfahan was selected as the emission source and the total suspended particles emitted from this stack was simulated by applying AERMOD and ISCST3 view models (version 8.2). In this vein, the modeling process was conducted using MM5 meteorological data in a 50 50 km extent with 2000 m network distance for each of the models in 1-h, 24-h term averages (short term averages) and monthly and annual periods (long term averages) at ground level concentrations (GLC). Results: Results indicated that the highest simulated concentration for both models occurred in a 2000 meters’ distance in the east of the stack. Moreover, the highest simulated concentration applying AERMOD was lower than that of applying ISCST3 in all term averages which is due to existing differences between applied algorithms in these two models. Conclusion: Consequently, applying AERMOD due to the use of more advanced and up-to-date algorithms have priority over ISCST3 model. Applying ISCST3 can also be useful for small projects that require less input data compared to the AERMOD.","PeriodicalId":32672,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Occupational Health","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Occupational Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18502/AOH.V3I1.342","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Background: One of the main parts of air quality management is known as modeling of atmospheric pollutants. In this regards, simultaneous application of several models in a project and comparing the results obtained from these models could have been a considerable contribution to air quality managers for taking a more efficient decision. Methods: In this study, the stack of an industrial plant in the southwest of Isfahan was selected as the emission source and the total suspended particles emitted from this stack was simulated by applying AERMOD and ISCST3 view models (version 8.2). In this vein, the modeling process was conducted using MM5 meteorological data in a 50 50 km extent with 2000 m network distance for each of the models in 1-h, 24-h term averages (short term averages) and monthly and annual periods (long term averages) at ground level concentrations (GLC). Results: Results indicated that the highest simulated concentration for both models occurred in a 2000 meters’ distance in the east of the stack. Moreover, the highest simulated concentration applying AERMOD was lower than that of applying ISCST3 in all term averages which is due to existing differences between applied algorithms in these two models. Conclusion: Consequently, applying AERMOD due to the use of more advanced and up-to-date algorithms have priority over ISCST3 model. Applying ISCST3 can also be useful for small projects that require less input data compared to the AERMOD.
AERMOD和ISCST3模型在不同时间尺度下模拟工业厂房烟囱排放污染物扩散的应用比较
背景:空气质量管理的主要部分之一是大气污染物建模。在这方面,在一个项目中同时应用几个模型并比较从这些模型中获得的结果,可能会对空气质量管理人员做出更有效的决策做出重大贡献。方法:本研究以伊斯法罕西南部一家工业工厂的烟囱为排放源,采用AERMOD和ISCST3视图模型(8.2版)对烟囱排放的总悬浮颗粒物进行模拟,建模过程是使用MM5气象数据在地面浓度(GLC)下的1小时、24小时长期平均值(短期平均值)以及月和年周期(长期平均值)中的每个模型在50 50公里范围内以2000米的网络距离进行的。结果:结果表明,两个模型的最高模拟浓度都发生在烟囱以东2000米处。此外,在所有项平均值中,应用AERMOD的最高模拟浓度低于应用ISCST3的模拟浓度,这是由于这两个模型中应用的算法之间存在差异。结论:因此,由于使用了更先进和最新的算法,应用AERMOD比ISCST3模型具有优先权。与AERMOD相比,应用ISCST3对于需要较少输入数据的小型项目也很有用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
24
审稿时长
6 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信