University Students’ Adherence to the COVID-19-guidelines: A Qualitative Study on Facilitators and Barriers

Tugce Varol, Francine Schneider, I. Mesters, R. Crutzen, R. Ruiter, G. Kok, G. T. ten Hoor
{"title":"University Students’ Adherence to the COVID-19-guidelines: A Qualitative Study on Facilitators and Barriers","authors":"Tugce Varol, Francine Schneider, I. Mesters, R. Crutzen, R. Ruiter, G. Kok, G. T. ten Hoor","doi":"10.5334/HPB.32","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective. This study aims to explore students’ adherence and reasons behind the (non)adherence to the COVID-19-regulations within a university setting.Methods. A total of 33 students participated in on-site and online focus group interviews (k=8). Discussed topics included the general COVID-19-guidelines of the university, including keeping ≥1.5 m distance, staying at home and getting tested when having symptoms, and wearing facemasks. Additionally, education and psychosocial wellbeing in the times of COVID-19 were discussed. We also conducted online interviews with stewards (2 focus group interviews and 1 individual interview) and security/crowd control officials (1 focus group interview) to learn more about students’ (non)adherence behaviors. Results. The findings of this study show that the interviewed students were willing to adhere to the guidelines within the university buildings. They mentioned several facilitators (e.g., the infrastructure of the buildings and staff) and barriers (e.g., being together with friends and difficulties with telling others to follow the regulations) for their compliance behaviors. Some students also stated that they are not afraid of COVID-19 because they are young, while others adhered to the regulations to protect vulnerable people.Conclusion. To create a safe environment within the university and alleviate the spread of the virus, future interventions require targeting the determinants of students’ non-adherence behaviors, such as lower risk perception (e.g., being young and no perceived threat/low vulnerability) and lower self-efficacy (e.g., for keeping distance, to determine symptoms for testing/isolating and to correct others).","PeriodicalId":92902,"journal":{"name":"Health psychology bulletin","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-02-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health psychology bulletin","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5334/HPB.32","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

Objective. This study aims to explore students’ adherence and reasons behind the (non)adherence to the COVID-19-regulations within a university setting.Methods. A total of 33 students participated in on-site and online focus group interviews (k=8). Discussed topics included the general COVID-19-guidelines of the university, including keeping ≥1.5 m distance, staying at home and getting tested when having symptoms, and wearing facemasks. Additionally, education and psychosocial wellbeing in the times of COVID-19 were discussed. We also conducted online interviews with stewards (2 focus group interviews and 1 individual interview) and security/crowd control officials (1 focus group interview) to learn more about students’ (non)adherence behaviors. Results. The findings of this study show that the interviewed students were willing to adhere to the guidelines within the university buildings. They mentioned several facilitators (e.g., the infrastructure of the buildings and staff) and barriers (e.g., being together with friends and difficulties with telling others to follow the regulations) for their compliance behaviors. Some students also stated that they are not afraid of COVID-19 because they are young, while others adhered to the regulations to protect vulnerable people.Conclusion. To create a safe environment within the university and alleviate the spread of the virus, future interventions require targeting the determinants of students’ non-adherence behaviors, such as lower risk perception (e.g., being young and no perceived threat/low vulnerability) and lower self-efficacy (e.g., for keeping distance, to determine symptoms for testing/isolating and to correct others).
大学生对COVID-19指导方针的坚持:关于推动者和障碍的定性研究
客观的本研究旨在探索学生在大学环境中对COVID-19法规的遵守情况及其背后的原因。方法。共有33名学生参加了现场和在线焦点小组访谈(k=8)。讨论的主题包括大学的一般COVID-19指南,包括保持≥1.5米的距离、待在家里并在出现症状时接受检测以及戴口罩。此外,还讨论了新冠肺炎时期的教育和心理健康问题。我们还对乘务员(2次焦点小组访谈和1次个人访谈)和安全/人群控制官员(1次焦点小组采访)进行了在线访谈,以了解更多关于学生(不)遵守行为的信息。后果这项研究的结果表明,受访学生愿意在大学建筑内遵守指导方针。他们提到了他们的合规行为的几个促进者(例如,建筑物和工作人员的基础设施)和障碍(例如,与朋友在一起以及告诉他人遵守法规的困难)。一些学生还表示,他们不害怕新冠肺炎,因为他们年轻,而其他学生则遵守规定,保护弱势群体。结论为了在大学内创造一个安全的环境并减缓病毒的传播,未来的干预措施需要针对学生不遵守行为的决定因素,如较低的风险感知(例如,年轻且没有感知到威胁/脆弱性)和较低的自我效能(例如,保持距离、确定测试/隔离症状并纠正他人)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
52 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信