Asymptotic and Bootstrap Confidence Intervals for the Process Capability Index cpy Based on Lindley Distributed Quality Characteristic

Q3 Business, Management and Accounting
Mahendra Saha, Sumit Kumar, Sudhansu S. Maiti, Abhimanyu Singh Yadav, S. Dey
{"title":"Asymptotic and Bootstrap Confidence Intervals for the Process Capability Index cpy Based on Lindley Distributed Quality Characteristic","authors":"Mahendra Saha, Sumit Kumar, Sudhansu S. Maiti, Abhimanyu Singh Yadav, S. Dey","doi":"10.1080/01966324.2019.1580644","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"SYNOPTIC ABSTRACT Process capability indices (PCIs) have been widely applied in measuring product potential and performance. It is of great significance to quality control engineers, as it quantifies the relation between the actual performance of the process and the preset specifications of the product. Among the plethora of the suggested PCIs, most of them were developed for normally distributed processes. In this article, we consider generalized process capability index Cpy suggested by Maiti et al. (2010), which can be used for normal, non-normal, and continuous as well as discrete random variables. The objective of this article is twofold. First, we obtain maximum likelihood estimator (MLE) and minimum variance unbiased estimator (MVUE) of the PCI Cpy for the Lindley distributed quality characteristics. Second, we compare asymptotic confidence interval (ACI) with four bootstrap confidence intervals (BCIs); namely, standard bootstrap (s-boot), percentile bootstrap (p-boot), Student’s t bootstrap (t-boot), and bias-corrected accelerated bootstrap (BCa-boot) of Cpy based on maximum likelihood method of estimation. Monte Carlo simulations have been carried out to compare the performance of MLEs and MVUEs, and also investigate the average widths, coverage probabilities, and relative coverages of ACI and BCIs of Cpy. Two real data sets have been analyzed for illustrative purposes.","PeriodicalId":35850,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Mathematical and Management Sciences","volume":"39 1","pages":"75 - 89"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/01966324.2019.1580644","citationCount":"13","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Mathematical and Management Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/01966324.2019.1580644","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Business, Management and Accounting","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 13

Abstract

SYNOPTIC ABSTRACT Process capability indices (PCIs) have been widely applied in measuring product potential and performance. It is of great significance to quality control engineers, as it quantifies the relation between the actual performance of the process and the preset specifications of the product. Among the plethora of the suggested PCIs, most of them were developed for normally distributed processes. In this article, we consider generalized process capability index Cpy suggested by Maiti et al. (2010), which can be used for normal, non-normal, and continuous as well as discrete random variables. The objective of this article is twofold. First, we obtain maximum likelihood estimator (MLE) and minimum variance unbiased estimator (MVUE) of the PCI Cpy for the Lindley distributed quality characteristics. Second, we compare asymptotic confidence interval (ACI) with four bootstrap confidence intervals (BCIs); namely, standard bootstrap (s-boot), percentile bootstrap (p-boot), Student’s t bootstrap (t-boot), and bias-corrected accelerated bootstrap (BCa-boot) of Cpy based on maximum likelihood method of estimation. Monte Carlo simulations have been carried out to compare the performance of MLEs and MVUEs, and also investigate the average widths, coverage probabilities, and relative coverages of ACI and BCIs of Cpy. Two real data sets have been analyzed for illustrative purposes.
基于Lindley分布质量特征的过程能力指数cpy的渐近置信区间和Bootstrap置信区间
过程能力指数在产品潜力和性能的测量中得到了广泛的应用。它量化了工艺的实际性能与产品的预设规格之间的关系,对质量控制工程师具有重要意义。在众多建议的pci中,大多数是为正态分布的进程开发的。本文考虑Maiti et al.(2010)提出的广义过程能力指标Cpy,该指标可用于正态、非正态、连续和离散随机变量。本文的目的是双重的。首先,我们得到了PCI Cpy的Lindley分布质量特征的最大似然估计量(MLE)和最小方差无偏估计量(MVUE)。其次,我们比较了渐近置信区间(ACI)与四个自举置信区间(bci);即基于最大似然估计法的Cpy的标准引导(s-boot)、百分位引导(p-boot)、学生t引导(t-boot)和偏差校正加速引导(BCa-boot)。通过蒙特卡罗模拟,比较了mle和mue的性能,并研究了Cpy的ACI和bci的平均宽度、覆盖概率和相对覆盖率。为了说明问题,分析了两个真实的数据集。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
American Journal of Mathematical and Management Sciences
American Journal of Mathematical and Management Sciences Business, Management and Accounting-Business, Management and Accounting (all)
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
5
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信