Perspectives to Modify and Counter Aging in the Frame of Subtelomere–Telomere Theory of Aging

G. Libertini
{"title":"Perspectives to Modify and Counter Aging in the Frame of Subtelomere–Telomere Theory of Aging","authors":"G. Libertini","doi":"10.21926/obm.geriatr.2204208","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The interpretation of aging as an adaptive and programmed phenomenon implies the existence of specific genetically determined and regulated aging-causing mechanisms. This interpretation is in contrast to the explanation of aging as the gradual accumulation of the effects of harmful factors that are only partially countered by natural selection. The subtelomere–telomere theory of aging offers what is required by the interpretation of aging as a programmed phenomenon. The experimentally documented mechanisms that are part of the subtelomere–telomere theory are the repression of subtelomeric sequences (TERRA sequences) consequent to the sliding of a telomeric hood over subtelomere in proportion to telomere shortening, epigenetic modifications caused by the repression of the subtelomeric sequences, cell senescence and gradual cell senescence (which are not synonyms, as discussed in the text), progressive decline of stem cells, and effects of these phenomena over the whole organism. Evidence against the interpretation of cell senescence and telomerase restrictions as defense mechanisms against cancer is reported. Consequently, the fears that telomerase activation or senescent cell elimination are potentially oncogenic factors should be eliminated as preconceived ideas or limited on the basis of any available evidence. In the context of the mechanisms described under the subtelomere–telomere theory, three types of strategies that could be used to modify and counter the mechanisms of aging can be deduced, namely telomerase activation, senescent cell elimination, and restoration of stem cell numbers to that existing in young individuals. The limits and the potential effectiveness of these methods, already the subject of active research, are briefly discussed.","PeriodicalId":74332,"journal":{"name":"OBM geriatrics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"OBM geriatrics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21926/obm.geriatr.2204208","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The interpretation of aging as an adaptive and programmed phenomenon implies the existence of specific genetically determined and regulated aging-causing mechanisms. This interpretation is in contrast to the explanation of aging as the gradual accumulation of the effects of harmful factors that are only partially countered by natural selection. The subtelomere–telomere theory of aging offers what is required by the interpretation of aging as a programmed phenomenon. The experimentally documented mechanisms that are part of the subtelomere–telomere theory are the repression of subtelomeric sequences (TERRA sequences) consequent to the sliding of a telomeric hood over subtelomere in proportion to telomere shortening, epigenetic modifications caused by the repression of the subtelomeric sequences, cell senescence and gradual cell senescence (which are not synonyms, as discussed in the text), progressive decline of stem cells, and effects of these phenomena over the whole organism. Evidence against the interpretation of cell senescence and telomerase restrictions as defense mechanisms against cancer is reported. Consequently, the fears that telomerase activation or senescent cell elimination are potentially oncogenic factors should be eliminated as preconceived ideas or limited on the basis of any available evidence. In the context of the mechanisms described under the subtelomere–telomere theory, three types of strategies that could be used to modify and counter the mechanisms of aging can be deduced, namely telomerase activation, senescent cell elimination, and restoration of stem cell numbers to that existing in young individuals. The limits and the potential effectiveness of these methods, already the subject of active research, are briefly discussed.
亚端粒-端粒衰老理论框架下的修正与对抗衰老的观点
将衰老解释为一种适应性和程序性现象意味着存在特定的基因决定和调节的衰老机制。这种解释与衰老的解释相反,衰老是有害因素影响的逐渐积累,而自然选择只能部分抵消这些影响。衰老的亚端粒-端粒理论提供了将衰老解释为一种程序现象所需要的东西。作为亚端粒-端粒理论的一部分,实验记录的机制是由于端粒盖在亚端粒上滑动而导致的亚端粒序列(TERRA序列)的抑制,亚端粒序列的抑制引起的表观遗传学修饰,细胞衰老和细胞逐渐衰老(如本文所述,这不是同义词),干细胞的逐渐衰退,以及这些现象对整个生物体的影响。有证据证明细胞衰老和端粒酶限制是癌症的防御机制。因此,对端粒酶激活或衰老细胞消除是潜在致癌因素的担忧应该作为先入为主的想法来消除,或者在任何现有证据的基础上加以限制。在亚端粒-端粒理论所描述的机制的背景下,可以推断出三种可用于改变和对抗衰老机制的策略,即端粒酶激活、衰老细胞消除和干细胞数量恢复到年轻人的水平。简要讨论了这些方法的局限性和潜在的有效性,这些方法已经是积极研究的主题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信