Cuidados y derechos. El avance hacia la democratización de los cuidados

Dolors Comas-d’Argemir
{"title":"Cuidados y derechos. El avance hacia la democratización de los cuidados","authors":"Dolors Comas-d’Argemir","doi":"10.34096/CAS.I49.6190","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article argues that care is of particular interest to economic anthropology, as it incorporates seemingly contradictory tendencies: to remain in the family sphere, outside of labor/capital relations and, on the other hand, to be in the process of commodification and to be constructed as a social and political question. Both tendencies are located in turn in the tension between the mechanisms of production and social reproduction. The article deals with the issue of care as a right and, therefore, as an issue of political scope. Starting from the observation that care falls disproportionately on women and families, it suggests the need for its equitable redistribution between family, state and community, and between women and men, in order to advance towards its democratization.","PeriodicalId":53240,"journal":{"name":"Cuadernos de Antropologia Social","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-05-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"9","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cuadernos de Antropologia Social","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.34096/CAS.I49.6190","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

Abstract

The article argues that care is of particular interest to economic anthropology, as it incorporates seemingly contradictory tendencies: to remain in the family sphere, outside of labor/capital relations and, on the other hand, to be in the process of commodification and to be constructed as a social and political question. Both tendencies are located in turn in the tension between the mechanisms of production and social reproduction. The article deals with the issue of care as a right and, therefore, as an issue of political scope. Starting from the observation that care falls disproportionately on women and families, it suggests the need for its equitable redistribution between family, state and community, and between women and men, in order to advance towards its democratization.
护理和权利。护理民主化的进展
这篇文章认为,关怀对经济人类学特别感兴趣,因为它包含了看似矛盾的倾向:留在家庭领域,在劳资关系之外,另一方面,处于商品化过程中,并被构建为一个社会和政治问题。这两种趋势反过来都位于生产机制和社会再生产之间的紧张关系中。该条将照顾问题视为一项权利,因此也将其视为一个政治范围问题。从护理不成比例地落在妇女和家庭身上的观察出发,它表明有必要在家庭、国家和社区之间,以及在妇女和男子之间进行公平的再分配,以推动其民主化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
8
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信