Racial animus and its association with punitive sentencing and crime types: Do Australian community attitudes reflect the United States’?

IF 1.5 3区 社会学 Q2 CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY
Ruth Brookman, K. Wiener, William DeSoto, Hassan Tajalli
{"title":"Racial animus and its association with punitive sentencing and crime types: Do Australian community attitudes reflect the United States’?","authors":"Ruth Brookman, K. Wiener, William DeSoto, Hassan Tajalli","doi":"10.1177/26338076211051785","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The racial animus model argues that public support for punitive sentencing of criminal offenders is shaped by threat perceptions associated with cultural minority groups. This study applies the racial animus model to examine support for the punitive sentencing of criminal offenders in the United States and Australia. It also examines whether racial animus mediates the possible difference in punitive attitudes between each country toward different crime types. Online survey data were obtained in the US and Australia to assess racial animus and punitive attitudes using six different crime scenarios. Results indicate that (a) individuals with higher levels of racial animus demonstrate greater levels of punitiveness; (b) Australians have higher levels of racial animus as compared to their US counterparts; and (c) racial animus mediates the difference of punitive attitudes between the two countries. Overall, punitive attitudes and racial animus vary cross-culturally, with Australians demonstrating more racial animus. Our mediation model provides evidence for the importance of racial animus in the cross-cultural demand for the punishment of criminal offenders.","PeriodicalId":29902,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Criminology","volume":"55 1","pages":"23 - 46"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Criminology","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/26338076211051785","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The racial animus model argues that public support for punitive sentencing of criminal offenders is shaped by threat perceptions associated with cultural minority groups. This study applies the racial animus model to examine support for the punitive sentencing of criminal offenders in the United States and Australia. It also examines whether racial animus mediates the possible difference in punitive attitudes between each country toward different crime types. Online survey data were obtained in the US and Australia to assess racial animus and punitive attitudes using six different crime scenarios. Results indicate that (a) individuals with higher levels of racial animus demonstrate greater levels of punitiveness; (b) Australians have higher levels of racial animus as compared to their US counterparts; and (c) racial animus mediates the difference of punitive attitudes between the two countries. Overall, punitive attitudes and racial animus vary cross-culturally, with Australians demonstrating more racial animus. Our mediation model provides evidence for the importance of racial animus in the cross-cultural demand for the punishment of criminal offenders.
种族敌意及其与惩罚性判决和犯罪类型的关系:澳大利亚社区的态度是否反映了美国的态度?
种族仇恨模型认为,公众对刑事罪犯惩罚性判决的支持是由与文化少数群体相关的威胁观念决定的。本研究应用种族仇恨模型来考察美国和澳大利亚对刑事罪犯惩罚性判决的支持。它还考察了种族仇恨是否调节了每个国家对不同犯罪类型的惩罚态度的可能差异。在美国和澳大利亚获得了在线调查数据,使用六种不同的犯罪场景来评估种族仇恨和惩罚态度。结果表明:(a)种族仇恨程度较高的人表现出更高程度的惩罚;(b) 与美国同行相比,澳大利亚人的种族仇恨程度更高;(c)种族仇恨调解了两国惩罚态度的差异。总的来说,惩罚态度和种族仇恨在不同文化中有所不同,澳大利亚人表现出更多的种族仇恨。我们的调解模式为种族仇恨在惩罚刑事罪犯的跨文化需求中的重要性提供了证据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Criminology
Journal of Criminology CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY-
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
32
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信