“Very easy, it’s an English class, therefore they should not rely on a French text”

IF 1.2 4区 教育学 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Caroline Payant, Philippa Bell
{"title":"“Very easy, it’s an English class, therefore they should not rely on a French text”","authors":"Caroline Payant, Philippa Bell","doi":"10.1075/ltyl.21004.pay","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n In the context of additional language (AL) learning, teachers need to focus on the development of language\n proficiency as well as on high-level literacy skills, for example, comprehending and evaluating information and creating new\n meaning. From a plurilingual perspective, AL learners’ first language (L1) is conceputalised as a useful tool in the development of\n target language proficiency; however, limited information exists concerning AL teachers’ beliefs towards the use of the L1 for\n high-level literacy instruction despite its potential utility for complex skill development. The aim of the present exploratory\n study was to examine the beliefs of in-service teachers of English as an additional language (EAL) working in the Quebec primary\n and secondary school system in francophone Canada regarding plurilingual approaches for classroom literacy practices and to\n uncover the factors that influence their beliefs. An online survey was distributed to in-service EAL teachers\n (N = 57) working in the province of Quebec, Canada. Findings suggest that teachers believe that it is most\n beneficial to adopt a monolingual lens to literacy instruction, a belief that denies learners’ use of their L1 and this, in a\n bilingual country. Implications for teacher education programs that challenge a monolingual lens are explored.","PeriodicalId":29728,"journal":{"name":"Language Teaching for Young Learners","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Language Teaching for Young Learners","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1075/ltyl.21004.pay","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

In the context of additional language (AL) learning, teachers need to focus on the development of language proficiency as well as on high-level literacy skills, for example, comprehending and evaluating information and creating new meaning. From a plurilingual perspective, AL learners’ first language (L1) is conceputalised as a useful tool in the development of target language proficiency; however, limited information exists concerning AL teachers’ beliefs towards the use of the L1 for high-level literacy instruction despite its potential utility for complex skill development. The aim of the present exploratory study was to examine the beliefs of in-service teachers of English as an additional language (EAL) working in the Quebec primary and secondary school system in francophone Canada regarding plurilingual approaches for classroom literacy practices and to uncover the factors that influence their beliefs. An online survey was distributed to in-service EAL teachers (N = 57) working in the province of Quebec, Canada. Findings suggest that teachers believe that it is most beneficial to adopt a monolingual lens to literacy instruction, a belief that denies learners’ use of their L1 and this, in a bilingual country. Implications for teacher education programs that challenge a monolingual lens are explored.
“很简单,这是一门英语课,因此他们不应该依赖法语文本”
在额外语言学习的背景下,教师需要专注于语言能力的发展以及高水平的识字技能,例如理解和评估信息以及创造新的意义。从多语言的角度来看,AL学习者的第一语言(L1)被概念化为发展目标语言能力的有用工具;然而,关于AL教师对使用L1进行高水平识字教学的信念的信息有限,尽管它对复杂的技能发展有潜在的效用。本探索性研究的目的是调查在加拿大法语区魁北克中小学系统工作的英语作为附加语言的在职教师对课堂识字实践的多语言方法的看法,并揭示影响他们看法的因素。向在职EAL教师分发了一份在线调查(N = 57)在加拿大魁北克省工作。研究结果表明,教师们认为,在双语国家,采用单语视角进行识字教学是最有益的,这种观点否定了学习者对母语的使用。探讨了挑战单语视角的教师教育项目的意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
7.70%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信