Women, work, and the digital economy

Q1 Social Sciences
U. Rani, R. Castel-Branco, S. Satija, Mahima Nayar
{"title":"Women, work, and the digital economy","authors":"U. Rani, R. Castel-Branco, S. Satija, Mahima Nayar","doi":"10.1080/13552074.2022.2151729","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Digital technologies are bringing about a transformation in the world of work at a rapid pace. Today, digitalisation has penetrated almost all major sectors of the economy (ILO 2021). Digital labour encompasses a wide range of occupations, from software developers and programmers to domestic workers on digital labour platforms, to market vendors and microentrepreneurs who use digital tools to reach customers. The COVID-19 pandemic has further accelerated the process of digitalisation, as work and livelihoods shifted online. Yet it also exposed and exacerbated inequalities between the global North and South, and along the lines of gender, race, caste, and class. Limited access to digital infrastructure, low digital literacy, and repressive sociocultural norms are some of the common reasons cited for this digital divide. Across the global South, governments have embraced digitalisation with the hope that it will increase productivity and competitiveness and generate jobs. The latter is particularly important given the high and rising unemployment, amidst an ongoing process of deagrarianisation and deindustrialisation. Whereas the structural adjustment policies of the 1980s and 1990s effectively reduced public investment in technological innovation, cutting much of the global South out of the dot-com boom, this new wave of digitalisation seemingly offers an opportunity to make up for the lost decades of neoliberalism. Indeed, digitalisation has been widely promoted by international development agencies as a policy pathway towards sustainable, inclusive, and equitable economic growth, with the ‘potential to improve social and economic outcomes for women (UN Women 2020, 1). However, Huws (2014) argues that digital innovation has facilitated the concentration of capital across industries and geographies, increasing their monopoly power, in a context where states’ regulatory capacity already hangs in the balance. As surplus value is increasingly derived from value extraction rather than commodity production, workers’ bargaining power has been severely undermined. Over the past decade, platform work has attracted significant interest from scholars in advanced economies of the global North, and it is now gaining attention from scholars in the global South. Much of the contemporary debate emphasises the misclassification of platform workers, lack of state regulation, and challenges in organising workers on digital labour platforms. The focus of the literature has generally been on male-dominated","PeriodicalId":35882,"journal":{"name":"Gender and Development","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gender and Development","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13552074.2022.2151729","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Digital technologies are bringing about a transformation in the world of work at a rapid pace. Today, digitalisation has penetrated almost all major sectors of the economy (ILO 2021). Digital labour encompasses a wide range of occupations, from software developers and programmers to domestic workers on digital labour platforms, to market vendors and microentrepreneurs who use digital tools to reach customers. The COVID-19 pandemic has further accelerated the process of digitalisation, as work and livelihoods shifted online. Yet it also exposed and exacerbated inequalities between the global North and South, and along the lines of gender, race, caste, and class. Limited access to digital infrastructure, low digital literacy, and repressive sociocultural norms are some of the common reasons cited for this digital divide. Across the global South, governments have embraced digitalisation with the hope that it will increase productivity and competitiveness and generate jobs. The latter is particularly important given the high and rising unemployment, amidst an ongoing process of deagrarianisation and deindustrialisation. Whereas the structural adjustment policies of the 1980s and 1990s effectively reduced public investment in technological innovation, cutting much of the global South out of the dot-com boom, this new wave of digitalisation seemingly offers an opportunity to make up for the lost decades of neoliberalism. Indeed, digitalisation has been widely promoted by international development agencies as a policy pathway towards sustainable, inclusive, and equitable economic growth, with the ‘potential to improve social and economic outcomes for women (UN Women 2020, 1). However, Huws (2014) argues that digital innovation has facilitated the concentration of capital across industries and geographies, increasing their monopoly power, in a context where states’ regulatory capacity already hangs in the balance. As surplus value is increasingly derived from value extraction rather than commodity production, workers’ bargaining power has been severely undermined. Over the past decade, platform work has attracted significant interest from scholars in advanced economies of the global North, and it is now gaining attention from scholars in the global South. Much of the contemporary debate emphasises the misclassification of platform workers, lack of state regulation, and challenges in organising workers on digital labour platforms. The focus of the literature has generally been on male-dominated
妇女、工作和数字经济
数字技术正在快速地给工作世界带来变革。如今,数字化已渗透到几乎所有主要经济部门(国际劳工组织2021年)。数字劳动力涵盖了广泛的职业,从软件开发人员和程序员到数字劳动力平台上的家政工人,再到市场供应商和使用数字工具接触客户的微型企业家。2019冠状病毒病大流行进一步加速了数字化进程,工作和生计转移到网上。然而,它也暴露并加剧了全球南北之间以及性别、种族、种姓和阶级之间的不平等。数字基础设施使用受限、数字素养低下以及压抑的社会文化规范是造成这种数字鸿沟的一些常见原因。在全球南方国家,各国政府都欣然接受数字化,希望它能提高生产率和竞争力,创造就业机会。鉴于正在进行的去土地化和去工业化进程中失业率居高不下且不断上升,后者尤其重要。上世纪80年代和90年代的结构调整政策有效地减少了对技术创新的公共投资,将全球大部分南方国家排除在了互联网繁荣之外,而这波新的数字化浪潮似乎提供了一个机会,可以弥补新自由主义失去的几十年。事实上,数字化已被国际发展机构广泛推广,作为实现可持续、包容和公平经济增长的政策途径,具有改善妇女社会和经济成果的潜力(联合国妇女署2020年,1)。然而,Huws(2014)认为,数字创新促进了资本在不同行业和地区的集中,增加了它们的垄断力量。在一个国家的监管能力已经处于平衡状态的背景下。由于剩余价值越来越多地来自价值提取,而不是商品生产,工人的议价能力受到严重损害。在过去的十年中,平台研究引起了全球北方发达经济体学者的极大兴趣,现在也引起了全球南方学者的关注。当代的许多辩论都强调了平台工人的错误分类、缺乏国家监管以及在数字劳工平台上组织工人所面临的挑战。文学的焦点通常是男性主导的
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Gender and Development
Gender and Development Social Sciences-Gender Studies
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
25
期刊介绍: Since 1993, Gender & Development has aimed to promote, inspire, and support development policy and practice, which furthers the goal of equality between women and men. This journal has a readership in over 90 countries and uses clear accessible language. Each issue of Gender & Development focuses on a topic of key interest to all involved in promoting gender equality through development. An up-to-the minute overview of the topic is followed by a range of articles from researchers, policy makers, and practitioners. Insights from development initiatives across the world are shared and analysed, and lessons identified. Innovative theoretical concepts are explored by key academic writers, and the uses of these concepts for policy and practice are explored.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信