U. Rani, R. Castel-Branco, S. Satija, Mahima Nayar
{"title":"Women, work, and the digital economy","authors":"U. Rani, R. Castel-Branco, S. Satija, Mahima Nayar","doi":"10.1080/13552074.2022.2151729","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Digital technologies are bringing about a transformation in the world of work at a rapid pace. Today, digitalisation has penetrated almost all major sectors of the economy (ILO 2021). Digital labour encompasses a wide range of occupations, from software developers and programmers to domestic workers on digital labour platforms, to market vendors and microentrepreneurs who use digital tools to reach customers. The COVID-19 pandemic has further accelerated the process of digitalisation, as work and livelihoods shifted online. Yet it also exposed and exacerbated inequalities between the global North and South, and along the lines of gender, race, caste, and class. Limited access to digital infrastructure, low digital literacy, and repressive sociocultural norms are some of the common reasons cited for this digital divide. Across the global South, governments have embraced digitalisation with the hope that it will increase productivity and competitiveness and generate jobs. The latter is particularly important given the high and rising unemployment, amidst an ongoing process of deagrarianisation and deindustrialisation. Whereas the structural adjustment policies of the 1980s and 1990s effectively reduced public investment in technological innovation, cutting much of the global South out of the dot-com boom, this new wave of digitalisation seemingly offers an opportunity to make up for the lost decades of neoliberalism. Indeed, digitalisation has been widely promoted by international development agencies as a policy pathway towards sustainable, inclusive, and equitable economic growth, with the ‘potential to improve social and economic outcomes for women (UN Women 2020, 1). However, Huws (2014) argues that digital innovation has facilitated the concentration of capital across industries and geographies, increasing their monopoly power, in a context where states’ regulatory capacity already hangs in the balance. As surplus value is increasingly derived from value extraction rather than commodity production, workers’ bargaining power has been severely undermined. Over the past decade, platform work has attracted significant interest from scholars in advanced economies of the global North, and it is now gaining attention from scholars in the global South. Much of the contemporary debate emphasises the misclassification of platform workers, lack of state regulation, and challenges in organising workers on digital labour platforms. The focus of the literature has generally been on male-dominated","PeriodicalId":35882,"journal":{"name":"Gender and Development","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gender and Development","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13552074.2022.2151729","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
Abstract
Digital technologies are bringing about a transformation in the world of work at a rapid pace. Today, digitalisation has penetrated almost all major sectors of the economy (ILO 2021). Digital labour encompasses a wide range of occupations, from software developers and programmers to domestic workers on digital labour platforms, to market vendors and microentrepreneurs who use digital tools to reach customers. The COVID-19 pandemic has further accelerated the process of digitalisation, as work and livelihoods shifted online. Yet it also exposed and exacerbated inequalities between the global North and South, and along the lines of gender, race, caste, and class. Limited access to digital infrastructure, low digital literacy, and repressive sociocultural norms are some of the common reasons cited for this digital divide. Across the global South, governments have embraced digitalisation with the hope that it will increase productivity and competitiveness and generate jobs. The latter is particularly important given the high and rising unemployment, amidst an ongoing process of deagrarianisation and deindustrialisation. Whereas the structural adjustment policies of the 1980s and 1990s effectively reduced public investment in technological innovation, cutting much of the global South out of the dot-com boom, this new wave of digitalisation seemingly offers an opportunity to make up for the lost decades of neoliberalism. Indeed, digitalisation has been widely promoted by international development agencies as a policy pathway towards sustainable, inclusive, and equitable economic growth, with the ‘potential to improve social and economic outcomes for women (UN Women 2020, 1). However, Huws (2014) argues that digital innovation has facilitated the concentration of capital across industries and geographies, increasing their monopoly power, in a context where states’ regulatory capacity already hangs in the balance. As surplus value is increasingly derived from value extraction rather than commodity production, workers’ bargaining power has been severely undermined. Over the past decade, platform work has attracted significant interest from scholars in advanced economies of the global North, and it is now gaining attention from scholars in the global South. Much of the contemporary debate emphasises the misclassification of platform workers, lack of state regulation, and challenges in organising workers on digital labour platforms. The focus of the literature has generally been on male-dominated
期刊介绍:
Since 1993, Gender & Development has aimed to promote, inspire, and support development policy and practice, which furthers the goal of equality between women and men. This journal has a readership in over 90 countries and uses clear accessible language. Each issue of Gender & Development focuses on a topic of key interest to all involved in promoting gender equality through development. An up-to-the minute overview of the topic is followed by a range of articles from researchers, policy makers, and practitioners. Insights from development initiatives across the world are shared and analysed, and lessons identified. Innovative theoretical concepts are explored by key academic writers, and the uses of these concepts for policy and practice are explored.