An assessment of learning styles of undergraduate medical students in three different types of curriculum

Q3 Health Professions
Abdulrahman Alfawzan, Moeber M. Mahzari, S. Agha, A. Omair, Omar Alfawzan, R. Alessa, A. Alturki, Kholoud Alshiha
{"title":"An assessment of learning styles of undergraduate medical students in three different types of curriculum","authors":"Abdulrahman Alfawzan, Moeber M. Mahzari, S. Agha, A. Omair, Omar Alfawzan, R. Alessa, A. Alturki, Kholoud Alshiha","doi":"10.4103/jnsm.jnsm_126_20","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Research in academia suggests that types of school may have an impact on learning styles. The study is aimed to examine the learning styles of students from medical institutions using different types of curriculum. Methods: This descriptive cross-sectional study was conducted in the three largest public-sector medical colleges using conventional, hybrid, and a problem-based learning-based curriculum in Saudi Arabia. By using convenient sampling, we collected 316 responses. The questionnaire consisted of sociodemographic data and index of learning style instrument. The categorical data were presented as percentages and descriptive data were analyzed using the Chi-square test. Value of P < 0.05 level was considered statistically significant. Results: Of the 316 participants, the male-to-female ratio was 1:1. Gender was associated with a significant difference in the visual/verbal dimension (P = 0.034). Irrespective of college, most of the participants are primarily balanced in active/reflective (67.2%), visual (51.1%), and sequential (68.8%) with slight shift toward sensing (47.6%). Significant differences between colleges were found in sensing/intuitive (P = 0.005) and sequential/global (P = 0.012) dimensions. There was no significant association between academic years with learning styles in the three medical colleges from public sector universities. Conclusion: Irrespective of college, most of the participants' preferred style was visual illustrations supported by hands-on teaching in a stepwise process. Although, medical students in different universities possessed different learning styles. It has also been shown that students in a single university tend to develop the same learning styles as they advance through the years. The collaboration between institutions using different types of the curriculum may increase the quality of education by developing effective teaching and learning methods that correspond with the learning styles of students.","PeriodicalId":33866,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Nature and Science of Medicine","volume":"4 1","pages":"267 - 273"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Nature and Science of Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jnsm.jnsm_126_20","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Health Professions","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Research in academia suggests that types of school may have an impact on learning styles. The study is aimed to examine the learning styles of students from medical institutions using different types of curriculum. Methods: This descriptive cross-sectional study was conducted in the three largest public-sector medical colleges using conventional, hybrid, and a problem-based learning-based curriculum in Saudi Arabia. By using convenient sampling, we collected 316 responses. The questionnaire consisted of sociodemographic data and index of learning style instrument. The categorical data were presented as percentages and descriptive data were analyzed using the Chi-square test. Value of P < 0.05 level was considered statistically significant. Results: Of the 316 participants, the male-to-female ratio was 1:1. Gender was associated with a significant difference in the visual/verbal dimension (P = 0.034). Irrespective of college, most of the participants are primarily balanced in active/reflective (67.2%), visual (51.1%), and sequential (68.8%) with slight shift toward sensing (47.6%). Significant differences between colleges were found in sensing/intuitive (P = 0.005) and sequential/global (P = 0.012) dimensions. There was no significant association between academic years with learning styles in the three medical colleges from public sector universities. Conclusion: Irrespective of college, most of the participants' preferred style was visual illustrations supported by hands-on teaching in a stepwise process. Although, medical students in different universities possessed different learning styles. It has also been shown that students in a single university tend to develop the same learning styles as they advance through the years. The collaboration between institutions using different types of the curriculum may increase the quality of education by developing effective teaching and learning methods that correspond with the learning styles of students.
三种不同类型课程对医学生学习风格的评价
背景:学术界的研究表明,学校类型可能会对学习风格产生影响。本研究旨在检验使用不同类型课程的医疗机构学生的学习风格。方法:这项描述性横断面研究在沙特阿拉伯三所最大的公立医学院进行,采用传统、混合和基于问题的学习课程。通过方便的抽样,我们收集了316份回复。问卷由社会人口学数据和学习风格工具指数组成。分类数据以百分比表示,描述性数据使用卡方检验进行分析。P<0.05水平的值被认为具有统计学意义。结果:316名参与者中,男女比例为1:1。性别与视觉/语言维度的显著差异相关(P=0.034)。无论大学,大多数参与者主要在主动/反思(67.2%)、视觉(51.1%)、,大学之间在感知/直觉维度(P=0.005)和顺序/全局维度(P=0.012)上存在显著差异。在公立大学的三所医学院中,学年与学习风格之间没有显著关联。结论:无论在哪所大学,大多数参与者的首选风格都是视觉插图,并辅以循序渐进的实践教学。尽管如此,不同大学的医学生具有不同的学习风格。研究还表明,一所大学的学生随着年龄的增长,往往会发展出相同的学习风格。使用不同类型课程的机构之间的合作可以通过制定符合学生学习风格的有效教学方法来提高教育质量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Nature and Science of Medicine
Journal of Nature and Science of Medicine Health Professions-Health Professions (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
31 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信