A comparative clinical study of collagen and paraffin gauze dressing on skin donor site

Q4 Medicine
Saugat Das, A. Singh, L. Singh, Nehar Sinam, Sanjib Singh
{"title":"A comparative clinical study of collagen and paraffin gauze dressing on skin donor site","authors":"Saugat Das, A. Singh, L. Singh, Nehar Sinam, Sanjib Singh","doi":"10.4103/jms.jms_25_21","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Split skin grafting (SSG) is a commonly performed plastic surgical procedure. It is done to cover wounds, defects from excision of cutaneous lesions, donor sites of fascio-cutaneous flaps. The harvest of a split thickness skin graft causes a partial thickness injury. Complete re-epithelialization occurs in 10-14 days, although the rate may be affected by the local wound environment. However, tissue desiccation and infection can convert a partial thickness injury to a full thickness loss. Aims and Objectives: The purpose of the study was to determine the best method of dressing the donor site split-thickness graft between conventional paraffin gauze dressing and collagen-based dressings with respect to the rate of healing, pain, secretion, infection, and cost. Settings and Design A hospital based Non-Randomized control trial was conducted in a tertiary hospital setup in Manipur, India, for a period of 2 years. This study was done on 60 patients who underwent split skin graft procedure. Materials and Methods: The selected sample will be divided into two groups. The donor site dressing was done in two different ways. One was dressed with collagen sheet and the other with paraffin gauze dressing. The two groups were compared on the basis of post-operative pain, complication, and healing. Statistical analysis Statistical analysis was done by using IBM SPSS Version 21 for windows. Descriptive statistics such as mean, proportion, percentage were used to present the result. Chi square test was used to see the association of proportions. Student's t- test and repeated ANOVA were used for the continuous variables. P-value <0.05 was taken as significant. Results: A total of 60 patients were included in this study as per the estimated sample size. The Case group i.e., the patients for whom the STSG donor site were dressed by Collagen dressing and the Control group i.e., the patients for whom paraffin gauze dressings were used. Patients with collagen dressings are found to have only minimal to moderate pain in the entire postoperative period. In these patient's analgesic requirement is reduced, and early mobilization can be done. This is the major advantage of using collagen as a donor site dressing. We found that collagen slightly increases epithelization, which will reduce the chance of infection saving time and resources for the hospital staff and minimizing discomfort for the patient. Conclusion: In this study it was found that dressing the donor site for split-thickness graft with collagen-based dressings gave better results with respect to the rate of healing and post-operative pain scores than conventional paraffin gauze dressing.","PeriodicalId":39636,"journal":{"name":"JMS - Journal of Medical Society","volume":"34 1","pages":"162 - 166"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JMS - Journal of Medical Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jms.jms_25_21","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Background: Split skin grafting (SSG) is a commonly performed plastic surgical procedure. It is done to cover wounds, defects from excision of cutaneous lesions, donor sites of fascio-cutaneous flaps. The harvest of a split thickness skin graft causes a partial thickness injury. Complete re-epithelialization occurs in 10-14 days, although the rate may be affected by the local wound environment. However, tissue desiccation and infection can convert a partial thickness injury to a full thickness loss. Aims and Objectives: The purpose of the study was to determine the best method of dressing the donor site split-thickness graft between conventional paraffin gauze dressing and collagen-based dressings with respect to the rate of healing, pain, secretion, infection, and cost. Settings and Design A hospital based Non-Randomized control trial was conducted in a tertiary hospital setup in Manipur, India, for a period of 2 years. This study was done on 60 patients who underwent split skin graft procedure. Materials and Methods: The selected sample will be divided into two groups. The donor site dressing was done in two different ways. One was dressed with collagen sheet and the other with paraffin gauze dressing. The two groups were compared on the basis of post-operative pain, complication, and healing. Statistical analysis Statistical analysis was done by using IBM SPSS Version 21 for windows. Descriptive statistics such as mean, proportion, percentage were used to present the result. Chi square test was used to see the association of proportions. Student's t- test and repeated ANOVA were used for the continuous variables. P-value <0.05 was taken as significant. Results: A total of 60 patients were included in this study as per the estimated sample size. The Case group i.e., the patients for whom the STSG donor site were dressed by Collagen dressing and the Control group i.e., the patients for whom paraffin gauze dressings were used. Patients with collagen dressings are found to have only minimal to moderate pain in the entire postoperative period. In these patient's analgesic requirement is reduced, and early mobilization can be done. This is the major advantage of using collagen as a donor site dressing. We found that collagen slightly increases epithelization, which will reduce the chance of infection saving time and resources for the hospital staff and minimizing discomfort for the patient. Conclusion: In this study it was found that dressing the donor site for split-thickness graft with collagen-based dressings gave better results with respect to the rate of healing and post-operative pain scores than conventional paraffin gauze dressing.
胶原与石蜡纱布敷料在供皮部位的临床比较研究
背景:切开植皮术是一种常见的整形外科手术。它用于覆盖伤口、皮肤损伤切除后的缺陷、筋膜皮瓣的供区。切开厚度的皮肤移植物的收获会导致部分厚度的损伤。完全再上皮化发生在10-14天,尽管其发生率可能受到局部伤口环境的影响。然而,组织干燥和感染可以将部分厚度损伤转化为全厚度损失。目的和目的:本研究的目的是从愈合率、疼痛、分泌物、感染和成本等方面确定传统石蜡纱布敷料和胶原基敷料之间的供体部位中厚移植物的最佳敷料方法。设置和设计一项基于医院的非随机对照试验在印度曼尼普尔的一家三级医院进行,为期2年。这项研究是对60名接受切开植皮手术的患者进行的。材料和方法:所选样本将分为两组。供体部位的敷料有两种不同的方法。一个用胶原片包扎,另一个用石蜡纱布包扎。根据术后疼痛、并发症和愈合情况对两组进行比较。统计分析使用IBM SPSS Version 21 for windows进行统计分析。采用平均值、比例、百分比等描述性统计数据来呈现结果。卡方检验用于观察比例的相关性。连续变量采用学生t检验和重复方差分析。P值<0.05为显著性。结果:根据估计的样本量,共有60名患者被纳入本研究。病例组,即STSG供区用胶原敷料包扎的患者,对照组,即使用石蜡纱布敷料的患者。发现使用胶原敷料的患者在整个术后期间只有轻微到中度疼痛。在这些情况下,患者的镇痛需求减少,并且可以进行早期动员。这是使用胶原蛋白作为供体部位敷料的主要优点。我们发现胶原蛋白会略微增加上皮化,这将减少感染的机会,为医院工作人员节省时间和资源,并最大限度地减少患者的不适。结论:在本研究中发现,与传统的石蜡纱布敷料相比,用胶原基敷料敷料在供区对中厚移植物的愈合率和术后疼痛评分有更好的效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
JMS - Journal of Medical Society
JMS - Journal of Medical Society Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信