Capturing Resilience in Context: Development and Validation of a Situational Judgment Test of Resilience

IF 2.9 4区心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED

Human Performance Pub Date : 2020-01-05 DOI:10.1080/08959285.2019.1709069

Yuejia Teng, M. Brannick, W. C. Borman

引用次数: 8

Abstract

ABSTRACT We developed a 40-item situational judgment test (R-SJT) to capture resilience in context. The scoring key was developed using a crowd-sourcing method (N = 100) and pilot-tested (N = 62). A new sample (N = 208) was used to investigate validity of the R-SJT scores. The R-SJT scores demonstrated acceptable levels of internal consistency, convergent validity, and evidence of better discriminant and criterion-related validity, compared to three Likert-type resilience measures. Scores on the R-SJT moderately correlated with the three resilience scales and personality measures including hardiness, negative affect, agreeableness, conscientiousness, and neuroticism. The R-SJT showed incremental validity beyond traditional resilience measures and personality for criterion measures of psychological adjustment (i.e., depression, anxiety, and stress). The R-SJT appears to be a viable instrument to measure resilience.

查看原文本刊更多论文

在情境中捕捉弹性:弹性情境判断测试的开发与验证

摘要:本研究设计了一套包含40个条目的情境判断测试(R-SJT)来考察情境中的心理弹性。评分方法采用众包方法(N = 100)和试点测试(N = 62)。采用新样本(N = 208)检验R-SJT评分的效度。与三种likert型弹性测量相比，R-SJT得分显示出可接受的内部一致性，收敛效度，以及更好的判别效度和标准相关效度的证据。R-SJT得分与适应力、负性、宜人性、尽责性和神经质性三个弹性量表和人格量表均呈中等相关。R-SJT在心理适应(即抑郁、焦虑和压力)的标准测量中比传统的弹性测量和人格测量显示出递增的效度。R-SJT似乎是衡量恢复力的可行工具。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Human Performance PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED-

CiteScore

4.30

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： Human Performance publishes research investigating the nature and role of performance in the workplace and in organizational settings and offers a rich variety of information going beyond the study of traditional job behavior. Dedicated to presenting original research, theory, and measurement methods, the journal investigates individual, team, and firm level performance factors that influence work and organizational effectiveness. Human Performance is a respected forum for behavioral scientists interested in variables that motivate and promote high-level human performance, particularly in organizational and occupational settings. The journal seeks to identify and stimulate relevant research, communication, and theory concerning human capabilities and effectiveness. It serves as a valuable intellectual link between such disciplines as industrial-organizational psychology, individual differences, work physiology, organizational behavior, human resource management, and human factors.