Transnational Private Environmental Rule Makers as Interest Organizations: Evidence from the European Union

IF 3.9 2区 社会学 Q2 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES
Stefan Renckens, Kristen Pue, Amy Janzwood
{"title":"Transnational Private Environmental Rule Makers as Interest Organizations: Evidence from the European Union","authors":"Stefan Renckens, Kristen Pue, Amy Janzwood","doi":"10.1162/glep_a_00665","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract While anecdotal evidence suggests that transnational private rule-making organizations (TPROs)—such as eco-certification organizations—lobby public policy makers, we know little about the extent of this phenomenon or the characteristics of TPROs that lobby. TPRO lobbying is relevant given that their rule-making activities directly intersect with public policy. We use the interest group and private governance literatures to examine TPRO features that distinguish TPROs that lobby from those that do not. We developed an original data set of 147 environmental TPROs and assessed TPRO lobbying by their registration in the European Union’s Transparency Register (TR). We find that a quarter of the TPROs in our data set are registered in the TR, and that capacity and expertise matter. Contrary to expectations, however, we do not find that certain key features of TPROs—such as business origins or credibility—are correlated with being registered, which implies that these features do not create inequalities in the TPRO population in terms of lobbying likelihood. By assessing environmental TPROs as interest organizations that engage in lobbying, we contribute to research on public–private governance interactions and identify TPROs as an interest group population in its own right.","PeriodicalId":47774,"journal":{"name":"Global Environmental Politics","volume":"22 1","pages":"136-170"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Environmental Politics","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1162/glep_a_00665","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Abstract While anecdotal evidence suggests that transnational private rule-making organizations (TPROs)—such as eco-certification organizations—lobby public policy makers, we know little about the extent of this phenomenon or the characteristics of TPROs that lobby. TPRO lobbying is relevant given that their rule-making activities directly intersect with public policy. We use the interest group and private governance literatures to examine TPRO features that distinguish TPROs that lobby from those that do not. We developed an original data set of 147 environmental TPROs and assessed TPRO lobbying by their registration in the European Union’s Transparency Register (TR). We find that a quarter of the TPROs in our data set are registered in the TR, and that capacity and expertise matter. Contrary to expectations, however, we do not find that certain key features of TPROs—such as business origins or credibility—are correlated with being registered, which implies that these features do not create inequalities in the TPRO population in terms of lobbying likelihood. By assessing environmental TPROs as interest organizations that engage in lobbying, we contribute to research on public–private governance interactions and identify TPROs as an interest group population in its own right.
作为利益组织的跨国私人环境规则制定者:来自欧盟的证据
摘要虽然传闻证据表明,跨国私人规则制定组织(TPRO)——如生态认证组织——游说公共政策制定者,但我们对这种现象的严重程度或游说的TPRO的特征知之甚少。鉴于TPRO的规则制定活动与公共政策直接交叉,TPRO的游说是相关的。我们使用利益集团和私人治理文献来研究TPRO的特征,这些特征将游说的TPRO与不游说的TPRO区分开来。我们开发了147个环境TPRO的原始数据集,并通过在欧盟透明度登记册(TR)中注册来评估TPRO的游说活动。我们发现,我们的数据集中有四分之一的TPRO在TR中注册,这一能力和专业知识很重要。然而,与预期相反,我们没有发现TPRO的某些关键特征——如商业来源或可信度——与注册相关,这意味着这些特征不会在TPRO人群中造成游说可能性方面的不平等。通过将环境TPRO评估为参与游说的利益组织,我们有助于研究公私治理互动,并将TPRO本身确定为利益群体。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
8.30%
发文量
43
期刊介绍: Global Environmental Politics examines the relationship between global political forces and environmental change, with particular attention given to the implications of local-global interactions for environmental management as well as the implications of environmental change for world politics. Each issue is divided into research articles and a shorter forum articles focusing on issues such as the role of states, multilateral institutions and agreements, trade, international finance, corporations, science and technology, and grassroots movements.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信