{"title":"Is There a Duty to Mitigate Damages in Civil Law? Should We Introduce Such a Duty? The Case of Qatar","authors":"M. Al-Kaabi","doi":"10.1163/2211906x-12020004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nIn common law, the non-breaching party of a contract should mitigate damages or risk a reduction in recovery for the breach. The party must take measures to reduce the loss arising from the breach by making a cover purchase, reselling the goods, or taking other actions. The breaching party may claim a reduction in the damages that would be awarded to the injured party up to the amount in which reasonable mitigation measures would have reduced the loss or injury to the injured party. Unlike in common law countries, some civil law countries do not contain a general duty to mitigate damages upon the non-breaching party. However, the concept of damage mitigation has gradually expanded beyond its original sphere of influence. The questions to be answered in this article are as follows: Why is there no duty to mitigate damages in civil law? Should we introduce such a duty?","PeriodicalId":38000,"journal":{"name":"Global Journal of Comparative Law","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Journal of Comparative Law","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/2211906x-12020004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
In common law, the non-breaching party of a contract should mitigate damages or risk a reduction in recovery for the breach. The party must take measures to reduce the loss arising from the breach by making a cover purchase, reselling the goods, or taking other actions. The breaching party may claim a reduction in the damages that would be awarded to the injured party up to the amount in which reasonable mitigation measures would have reduced the loss or injury to the injured party. Unlike in common law countries, some civil law countries do not contain a general duty to mitigate damages upon the non-breaching party. However, the concept of damage mitigation has gradually expanded beyond its original sphere of influence. The questions to be answered in this article are as follows: Why is there no duty to mitigate damages in civil law? Should we introduce such a duty?
期刊介绍:
The Global Journal of Comparative Law is a peer reviewed periodical that provides a dynamic platform for the dissemination of ideas on comparative law and reports on developments in the field of comparative law from all parts of the world. In our contemporary globalized world, it is almost impossible to isolate developments in the law in one jurisdiction or society from another. At the same time, what is traditionally called comparative law is increasingly subsumed under aspects of International Law. The Global Journal of Comparative Law therefore aims to maintain the discipline of comparative legal studies as vigorous and dynamic by deepening the space for comparative work in its transnational context.