Content-filtering AI systems–limitations, challenges and regulatory approaches

IF 1.8 Q1 LAW
Althaf Marsoof, A. Luco, H. Tan, Shafiq R. Joty
{"title":"Content-filtering AI systems–limitations, challenges and regulatory approaches","authors":"Althaf Marsoof, A. Luco, H. Tan, Shafiq R. Joty","doi":"10.1080/13600834.2022.2078395","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Online service providers, and even governments, have increasingly relied on Artificial Intelligence (‘AI’) to regulate content on the internet. In some jurisdictions, the law has incentivised, if not obligated, service providers to adopt measures to detect, track, and remove objectionable content such as terrorist propaganda. Consequently, service providers are being pushed to use AI to moderate online content. However, content-filtering AI systems are subject to limitations that affect their accuracy and transparency. These limitations open the possibility for legitimate content to be removed and objectionable content to remain online. Such an outcome could endanger human well-being and the exercise of our human rights. In view of these challenges, we argue that the design and use of content-filtering AI systems should be regulated. AI ethics principles such as transparency, explainability, fairness, and human-centricity should guide such regulatory efforts.","PeriodicalId":44342,"journal":{"name":"Information & Communications Technology Law","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Information & Communications Technology Law","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13600834.2022.2078395","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT Online service providers, and even governments, have increasingly relied on Artificial Intelligence (‘AI’) to regulate content on the internet. In some jurisdictions, the law has incentivised, if not obligated, service providers to adopt measures to detect, track, and remove objectionable content such as terrorist propaganda. Consequently, service providers are being pushed to use AI to moderate online content. However, content-filtering AI systems are subject to limitations that affect their accuracy and transparency. These limitations open the possibility for legitimate content to be removed and objectionable content to remain online. Such an outcome could endanger human well-being and the exercise of our human rights. In view of these challenges, we argue that the design and use of content-filtering AI systems should be regulated. AI ethics principles such as transparency, explainability, fairness, and human-centricity should guide such regulatory efforts.
内容过滤人工智能系统——限制、挑战和监管方法
摘要在线服务提供商,甚至政府,越来越依赖人工智能(AI)来监管互联网上的内容。在一些司法管辖区,法律鼓励(如果没有义务的话)服务提供商采取措施,检测、跟踪和删除恐怖宣传等令人反感的内容。因此,服务提供商被要求使用人工智能来调节在线内容。然而,内容过滤人工智能系统受到限制,影响了其准确性和透明度。这些限制为合法内容被删除和令人反感的内容保持在线打开了可能性。这种结果可能危及人类福祉和我们行使人权。鉴于这些挑战,我们认为应该对内容过滤人工智能系统的设计和使用进行监管。人工智能伦理原则,如透明度、可解释性、公平性和以人为本,应指导此类监管工作。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
17
期刊介绍: The last decade has seen the introduction of computers and information technology at many levels of human transaction. Information technology (IT) is now used for data collation, in daily commercial transactions like transfer of funds, conclusion of contract, and complex diagnostic purposes in fields such as law, medicine and transport. The use of IT has expanded rapidly with the introduction of multimedia and the Internet. Any new technology inevitably raises a number of questions ranging from the legal to the ethical and the social. Information & Communications Technology Law covers topics such as: the implications of IT for legal processes and legal decision-making and related ethical and social issues.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信