Condemning Domitian or Un-damning Themselves? Tacitus and Pliny on the Domitianic "Reign of Terror"

Martin Szoke
{"title":"Condemning Domitian or Un-damning Themselves? Tacitus and Pliny on the Domitianic \"Reign of Terror\"","authors":"Martin Szoke","doi":"10.5406/illiclasstud.44.2.0430","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:This article reconsiders two of our most important literary sources on Domitian: Pliny the Younger's Letters and Tacitus's Agricola. Although historians have either accepted Pliny's and Tacitus's portrayal of Domitian as a bloodthirsty tyrant or dismissed it as the invention of two vengeful senators, I argue that their depiction of the last Flavian and his reign is much more complex than is usually assumed, for both men had in fact themselves served in the Domitianic administration. In their literary projects, they thus strove not only to condemn the former emperor, but also to un-damn themselves.","PeriodicalId":81501,"journal":{"name":"Illinois classical studies","volume":"44 1","pages":"430 - 452"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-05-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Illinois classical studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5406/illiclasstud.44.2.0430","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract:This article reconsiders two of our most important literary sources on Domitian: Pliny the Younger's Letters and Tacitus's Agricola. Although historians have either accepted Pliny's and Tacitus's portrayal of Domitian as a bloodthirsty tyrant or dismissed it as the invention of two vengeful senators, I argue that their depiction of the last Flavian and his reign is much more complex than is usually assumed, for both men had in fact themselves served in the Domitianic administration. In their literary projects, they thus strove not only to condemn the former emperor, but also to un-damn themselves.
谴责Domitian还是不谴责自己?塔西佗与普林尼论多米尼克的“恐怖统治”
摘要:本文重新审视了我们对多米提安的两个最重要的文学来源:小普林尼的《书信集》和塔西佗的《农家乐》。尽管历史学家要么接受普林尼和塔西佗对多米提安嗜血暴君的描述,要么将其视为两个复仇的元老的虚构,但我认为,他们对最后一个弗拉维安及其统治的描述比通常认为的要复杂得多,因为这两个人实际上都曾在多米提安政府任职。因此,在他们的文学作品中,他们不仅努力谴责这位前皇帝,也努力为自己洗脱罪责。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信