{"title":"Pracademic productive friction: boundary crossing and pressure points","authors":"J. Mynott, Michaela Zimmatore","doi":"10.1108/jpcc-11-2020-0093","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PurposeProductive friction (Ward et al., 2011) can exist as pracademics cross between boundaries of their different identities. Through an exploration of the self-perception of two collaborating pracademics, this paper will consider that organisational and occupational (Evetts, 2009) elements exist that generate professional friction for pracademics.Design/methodology/approachUsing two consecutive Lesson Study cycles as a boundary object, the authors will consider their pracademic identity through a spatial approach. Their perceptions are expressed through semi-structured qualitative interviews and subsequent thematic analysis. This analysis is then explored through Engeström's (2001) learning stages to consider how pracademics interact within the contradictions of their identities and within their context and their work.FindingsTime, purpose, integration and collaboration are all elements that impact on pracademic identities. For each one of these themes, pracademics both experience friction and find resolutions. As these themes vary, there are also moments of unresolved friction, where the pracademics maintain their work based on their enthusiasm alone. Constraints on time and the visibility of pracademic emerge. Exploring these pressure points and their resolutions is key to understanding how pracademics can be further supported by other professionals.Originality/valueWhile it is not possible to draw large conclusions from the experiences and perceptions of two primary-school-based pracademics, their experiences and understanding of contextual pressure points may facilitate the support of other pracademics and resonant with their experiences, particularly if they are using Lesson Study.","PeriodicalId":44790,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Professional Capital and Community","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Professional Capital and Community","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/jpcc-11-2020-0093","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3
Abstract
PurposeProductive friction (Ward et al., 2011) can exist as pracademics cross between boundaries of their different identities. Through an exploration of the self-perception of two collaborating pracademics, this paper will consider that organisational and occupational (Evetts, 2009) elements exist that generate professional friction for pracademics.Design/methodology/approachUsing two consecutive Lesson Study cycles as a boundary object, the authors will consider their pracademic identity through a spatial approach. Their perceptions are expressed through semi-structured qualitative interviews and subsequent thematic analysis. This analysis is then explored through Engeström's (2001) learning stages to consider how pracademics interact within the contradictions of their identities and within their context and their work.FindingsTime, purpose, integration and collaboration are all elements that impact on pracademic identities. For each one of these themes, pracademics both experience friction and find resolutions. As these themes vary, there are also moments of unresolved friction, where the pracademics maintain their work based on their enthusiasm alone. Constraints on time and the visibility of pracademic emerge. Exploring these pressure points and their resolutions is key to understanding how pracademics can be further supported by other professionals.Originality/valueWhile it is not possible to draw large conclusions from the experiences and perceptions of two primary-school-based pracademics, their experiences and understanding of contextual pressure points may facilitate the support of other pracademics and resonant with their experiences, particularly if they are using Lesson Study.
目的生产性摩擦(Ward et al.,2011)可能存在于实践学跨越其不同身份边界的过程中。通过对两种合作实践的自我感知的探索,本文将考虑组织和职业因素(Evetts,2009)的存在,这些因素会给实践带来职业摩擦。设计/方法论/方法使用两个连续的课程学习周期作为边界对象,作者将通过空间方法考虑他们的实践身份。他们的看法通过半结构化的定性访谈和随后的主题分析来表达。然后,通过Engeström(2001)的学习阶段对这一分析进行了探索,以考虑实践学如何在其身份的矛盾中以及在其背景和工作中相互作用。发现时间、目的、整合和协作都是影响实践身份的因素。对于这些主题中的每一个,实践学都会经历摩擦并找到解决方案。由于这些主题各不相同,也有未解决的摩擦时刻,实践派仅凭他们的热情来维持他们的工作。出现了对时间和实践可见性的限制。探索这些压力点及其解决方案是了解如何进一步得到其他专业人员支持的关键。独创性/价值虽然不可能从两个小学实习的经历和看法中得出大的结论,但他们的经历和对情境压力点的理解可能有助于其他实习的支持,并与他们的经历产生共鸣,特别是如果他们正在使用课程研究。