Rethinking Habermas, from the ideal to the individual: a practical application of critical management theory

Q1 Social Sciences
Joseph Heilman, Arthur J. Sementelli
{"title":"Rethinking Habermas, from the ideal to the individual: a practical application of critical management theory","authors":"Joseph Heilman, Arthur J. Sementelli","doi":"10.1080/10841806.2019.1678351","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Contemporary public administration has much to do with routine. Daily circumstances afford us a perennial onslaught of quotidian tasks, which become routine or typical over time. The sedimentation of typical responses has provided a relatively stable and durable public sector, generally geared towards achieving larger public interests. However, buried within these sedimented practices are communication structures, often obscuring the relationship between action and consequence. This obfuscation impedes our ability to comprehend the situational and transformational aspects of public administration. Habermas’ Theory of Communicative Action (ToCA) recognized these obfuscations as impediments to rational action, which worked toward the ends of enlightenment. However, Habermas’ ToCA has remained underutilized. Therefore, we present a theoretically practical interpretation of the ToCA as a remedy, putting forth the argument that it can be included in a modified framework to add utility to discussions of administrative praxis.","PeriodicalId":37205,"journal":{"name":"Administrative Theory and Praxis","volume":"42 1","pages":"430 - 442"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/10841806.2019.1678351","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Administrative Theory and Praxis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10841806.2019.1678351","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Abstract Contemporary public administration has much to do with routine. Daily circumstances afford us a perennial onslaught of quotidian tasks, which become routine or typical over time. The sedimentation of typical responses has provided a relatively stable and durable public sector, generally geared towards achieving larger public interests. However, buried within these sedimented practices are communication structures, often obscuring the relationship between action and consequence. This obfuscation impedes our ability to comprehend the situational and transformational aspects of public administration. Habermas’ Theory of Communicative Action (ToCA) recognized these obfuscations as impediments to rational action, which worked toward the ends of enlightenment. However, Habermas’ ToCA has remained underutilized. Therefore, we present a theoretically practical interpretation of the ToCA as a remedy, putting forth the argument that it can be included in a modified framework to add utility to discussions of administrative praxis.
反思哈贝马斯:从理想到个体:批判管理理论的实践应用
摘要当代公共行政与日常事务有很大关系。日常环境给我们带来了日常任务的常年冲击,随着时间的推移,这些任务变得司空见惯。典型对策的沉淀提供了一个相对稳定和持久的公共部门,通常旨在实现更大的公共利益。然而,在这些沉淀的实践中隐藏着沟通结构,往往掩盖了行动和后果之间的关系。这种混淆阻碍了我们理解公共行政的情境和转型方面的能力。哈贝马斯的交际行为理论(ToCA)承认这些混淆是理性行为的障碍,而理性行为正朝着启蒙的方向发展。然而,哈贝马斯的ToCA仍然没有得到充分利用。因此,我们对ToCA作为一种补救措施进行了理论上的实践解释,提出了可以将其纳入一个修改后的框架中,为行政实践的讨论增加效用的论点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Administrative Theory and Praxis
Administrative Theory and Praxis Social Sciences-Sociology and Political Science
CiteScore
8.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
17
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信