Reading the Lyrical “Self”

IF 0.1 Q4 HISTORY
Zoltán Kulcsár-Szabó
{"title":"Reading the Lyrical “Self”","authors":"Zoltán Kulcsár-Szabó","doi":"10.1163/23751606-01501005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Lyrical subjectivity is often thought of as the manifestation or self-expression of real, empirical personhood. The concept of “lyrical self” has since long served as a means to distinguish between lyrical subject, considered as a poetic form and the empirical person of the author. The theoretical presuppositions behind this concept seem, however, to blur the line of separation between the two. The paper proposes a reconsideration of the issue by drawing the attention to the discursive and material techniques of recording the empirical subject in poetic texts. In the first part, it discusses Rilke’s lyrical epitaph and one of Charles Olson’s Maximus poems, and confronts the conclusions with the theoretical concept of lyrical self as elaborated in German Geistesgeschichte. In the second part, it outlines a case study on the reception of the Hungarian poet Attila József with special respect to those phenomena (traces of a lyrical autobiography, appearances of the author’s name in the poems, references to the author’s body) which at first sight seem to be records of the empirical subject in the poetic text.","PeriodicalId":42064,"journal":{"name":"Transcultural Studies","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2019-05-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transcultural Studies","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/23751606-01501005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Lyrical subjectivity is often thought of as the manifestation or self-expression of real, empirical personhood. The concept of “lyrical self” has since long served as a means to distinguish between lyrical subject, considered as a poetic form and the empirical person of the author. The theoretical presuppositions behind this concept seem, however, to blur the line of separation between the two. The paper proposes a reconsideration of the issue by drawing the attention to the discursive and material techniques of recording the empirical subject in poetic texts. In the first part, it discusses Rilke’s lyrical epitaph and one of Charles Olson’s Maximus poems, and confronts the conclusions with the theoretical concept of lyrical self as elaborated in German Geistesgeschichte. In the second part, it outlines a case study on the reception of the Hungarian poet Attila József with special respect to those phenomena (traces of a lyrical autobiography, appearances of the author’s name in the poems, references to the author’s body) which at first sight seem to be records of the empirical subject in the poetic text.
阅读抒情的“自我”
抒情的主体性通常被认为是真实的、经验的人格的表现或自我表达。长期以来,“抒情自我”的概念一直是区分抒情主体(作为一种诗歌形式)和作者的经验人格的一种手段。然而,这一概念背后的理论前提似乎模糊了两者之间的界限。本文提出了一个重新考虑的问题,提请注意的话语和材料技术记录的经验主题的诗歌文本。第一部分对里尔克的抒情诗墓志铭和奥尔森的一首《Maximus》进行了探讨,并以德语《Geistesgeschichte》所阐述的抒情自我的理论概念进行了对比。在第二部分中,它概述了匈牙利诗人阿提拉József接受的案例研究,特别关注那些现象(抒情自传的痕迹,在诗歌中出现作者的名字,提到作者的身体),乍一看似乎是诗歌文本中经验主体的记录。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
30 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Transcultural Studies is a peer-reviewed, open-access journal committed to promoting the knowledge and research of transculturality in all disciplines. It is published by the Cluster of Excellence “Asia and Europe in a Global Context: The Dynamics of Transculturality” of the Ruprecht-Karls-Universität Heidelberg.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信