“Property rights are human rights”: Bureaucratization and the logics of rule of law interventionism in postwar Kosovo

IF 1.4 3区 社会学 Q2 ANTHROPOLOGY
Agathe Mora
{"title":"“Property rights are human rights”: Bureaucratization and the logics of rule of law interventionism in postwar Kosovo","authors":"Agathe Mora","doi":"10.1111/plar.12517","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"What makes property restitution “successful” in postwar Kosovo?Howaremultiple,overlapping,andconflictingprop-erty regimes folded into the process of postwar transition? And what can the implementation of rule of law illuminate about international interventionism? Daily practices at the Kosovo Property Agency (KPA, the administrative, quasi-judicial institution that the United Nations tasked with post-war property restitution) reveal the runaway effect of the growing bureaucratization of international human rights: institutional success is measured through neoliberal “technologies of accountability,” and the project itself becomes the key outcome. This is the result of a paradigm shift in global development that saw the legalization of property rights as a cornerstone of post-conflict state-building. A parallel shift towards managerialism and auditability in public sector management has given rise to demands for efficiency and accountability in transnational institutions. Together, these moves, which found fertile ground in Kosovo’s reconstruction process and determined the mandate and institutional setup of property restitution, transform rule of law from an idealized public good to a shortsighted, box-ticking exercise chiefly concerned with the production of measurable returns. These benchmarks sidestep the complicated","PeriodicalId":56256,"journal":{"name":"Polar-Political and Legal Anthropology Review","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Polar-Political and Legal Anthropology Review","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/plar.12517","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANTHROPOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

What makes property restitution “successful” in postwar Kosovo?Howaremultiple,overlapping,andconflictingprop-erty regimes folded into the process of postwar transition? And what can the implementation of rule of law illuminate about international interventionism? Daily practices at the Kosovo Property Agency (KPA, the administrative, quasi-judicial institution that the United Nations tasked with post-war property restitution) reveal the runaway effect of the growing bureaucratization of international human rights: institutional success is measured through neoliberal “technologies of accountability,” and the project itself becomes the key outcome. This is the result of a paradigm shift in global development that saw the legalization of property rights as a cornerstone of post-conflict state-building. A parallel shift towards managerialism and auditability in public sector management has given rise to demands for efficiency and accountability in transnational institutions. Together, these moves, which found fertile ground in Kosovo’s reconstruction process and determined the mandate and institutional setup of property restitution, transform rule of law from an idealized public good to a shortsighted, box-ticking exercise chiefly concerned with the production of measurable returns. These benchmarks sidestep the complicated
“财产权即人权”:科索沃战后的官僚化与法治干预主义的逻辑
是什么使得战后科索沃的财产归还“成功”?多重、重叠和冲突的产权制度是如何融入战后转型过程的?法治的实施对国际干涉主义有什么启示?科索沃财产机构(KPA,联合国负责战后财产归还的行政、准司法机构)的日常实践揭示了国际人权日益官僚化的失控效应:机构的成功是通过新自由主义的“问责技术”来衡量的,而项目本身则成为关键的结果。这是全球发展模式转变的结果,这种转变将产权合法化视为冲突后国家建设的基石。公共部门管理向管理主义和可审计性的平行转变引起了对跨国机构效率和责任的要求。这些举措为科索沃的重建进程找到了肥沃的土壤,并确定了财产归还的任务和制度设置,它们将法治从一种理想化的公共产品转变为一种短视的、打勾的做法,主要关注产生可衡量的回报。这些基准避开了复杂的问题
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
9.10%
发文量
28
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信