Methodology for the development and application of clinical decisions support information technologies with consideration of civil-legal grounds

Q3 Computer Science
Y. Hnatchuk, T. Hovorushchenko, Olga Pavlova
{"title":"Methodology for the development and application of clinical decisions support information technologies with consideration of civil-legal grounds","authors":"Y. Hnatchuk, T. Hovorushchenko, Olga Pavlova","doi":"10.32620/reks.2023.1.03","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Currently, there are no clinical decision support information technologies (CDSIT) that would consider civil-legal grounds when forming a decision for clinicians. Therefore, the design, development, and implementation of CDSIT, which considers civil-legal grounds when forming decisions, are actual problems. Methodology for the development and application of knowledge-driven, rule-based, clinical decisions support information technologies with consideration of civil-legal grounds has been developed, which provides a theoretical basis for developing clinical decisions support information technology with consideration of civil-legal grounds and partial CDSITs regarding the possibility of providing medical services of a certain type. In addition to the conclusion about the possibility or impossibility of providing certain medical services, the developed methodology ensures the presence of all essential terms (from the viewpoint of civil law regulation) in the contract for the certain medical service's provision and/or the data on potential patients for the provision of such a service, as well as minimization of the influence of the human factor when making clinical decisions. It is advisable to evaluate the CDSITs with consideration of civil-legal grounds, developed according to the proposed methodology, from the viewpoint of the correctness of the decisions generated by them, as well as from the viewpoint of their usefulness for clinics. In this paper, experiments with the methodology-based CDSIT regarding the possibility of performing a surrogate motherhood procedure with consideration of civil-legal grounds were conducted. Such experiments showed the correctness of the generated decisions at the level of 97 %. Experiments also demonstrated the usefulness of such IT for clinics from the viewpoint of eliminating adverse legal consequences, as they might arise due to violation or disregard of legal, and moral and ethical norms.","PeriodicalId":36122,"journal":{"name":"Radioelectronic and Computer Systems","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Radioelectronic and Computer Systems","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32620/reks.2023.1.03","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Computer Science","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Currently, there are no clinical decision support information technologies (CDSIT) that would consider civil-legal grounds when forming a decision for clinicians. Therefore, the design, development, and implementation of CDSIT, which considers civil-legal grounds when forming decisions, are actual problems. Methodology for the development and application of knowledge-driven, rule-based, clinical decisions support information technologies with consideration of civil-legal grounds has been developed, which provides a theoretical basis for developing clinical decisions support information technology with consideration of civil-legal grounds and partial CDSITs regarding the possibility of providing medical services of a certain type. In addition to the conclusion about the possibility or impossibility of providing certain medical services, the developed methodology ensures the presence of all essential terms (from the viewpoint of civil law regulation) in the contract for the certain medical service's provision and/or the data on potential patients for the provision of such a service, as well as minimization of the influence of the human factor when making clinical decisions. It is advisable to evaluate the CDSITs with consideration of civil-legal grounds, developed according to the proposed methodology, from the viewpoint of the correctness of the decisions generated by them, as well as from the viewpoint of their usefulness for clinics. In this paper, experiments with the methodology-based CDSIT regarding the possibility of performing a surrogate motherhood procedure with consideration of civil-legal grounds were conducted. Such experiments showed the correctness of the generated decisions at the level of 97 %. Experiments also demonstrated the usefulness of such IT for clinics from the viewpoint of eliminating adverse legal consequences, as they might arise due to violation or disregard of legal, and moral and ethical norms.
考虑民事法律依据的临床决策支持信息技术的开发和应用方法
目前,还没有临床决策支持信息技术(CDSIT)在为临床医生制定决策时考虑民事法律依据。因此,在决策时考虑民事法律依据的CDSIT的设计、开发和实施是一个实际问题。开发和应用知识驱动的、基于规则的、考虑到民事法律依据的临床决策支持信息技术的方法已经开发出来,这为开发考虑到民事法律依据和关于提供某种类型医疗服务的可能性的部分cdsit的临床决策支持信息技术提供了理论基础。除了关于提供某些医疗服务的可能性或不可能性的结论外,所制定的方法还确保在提供某些医疗服务的合同中存在所有必要条款(从民法法规的角度来看)和/或提供此类服务的潜在患者数据,以及在作出临床决定时尽量减少人为因素的影响。评估cdsit时,建议考虑民事法律依据,根据建议的方法,从它们所产生的决定的正确性的角度,以及从它们对诊所的有用性的角度。在本文中,实验与基于方法的CDSIT关于执行代孕母亲程序的可能性考虑民事法律依据进行。这些实验表明,所生成的决策的正确性达到97%的水平。实验还表明,从消除不利的法律后果的角度来看,这种信息技术对诊所的有用性,因为它们可能因违反或无视法律、道德和伦理规范而产生。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Radioelectronic and Computer Systems
Radioelectronic and Computer Systems Computer Science-Computer Graphics and Computer-Aided Design
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
50
审稿时长
2 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信