{"title":"The Performance of Authenticity: The Making of Jazz and the Self in Autobiography","authors":"Thomas M. Kitts","doi":"10.1080/03007766.2023.2169876","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"out the book this concept, deriving from postcolonial theory, recurs). The fourth chapter is an inquiry into the abiding polarization between the aesthetic principles, language, and behavioral system characterizing the two adversarial branches of local jazz. Through the prism of Bourdieusian field theory with its emphasis on intra-field struggles for positions, competing hierarchies, and symbolic violence, the overall account of the jazz scene in which authenticity is at stake is rather disheartening. Despite citing selfcritical voices in both camps, Havas suggests that the ethnicized conflict by and large prevents musicians from expressing mutual respect or engaging in musical collaborations and exchanges across generic boundaries. It is interesting, however, that no reference is made to how the domestic jazz culture’s ethnic other, the Jewish minority, has been participating in this “black-and-white” dynamic after the resuscitation of jazz in the 1960s. The last and fifth chapter, titled “Othering Whiteness: Permanence and Change in Romani Musicians’ Jazz Habitus,” is dedicated to the musical socialization of Roma jazzists, the educational and symbolic role of family, kinship, and tradition whereby not only careers but also cultural meanings and identities are formed. Havas points out that, as with African American musicians, Roma jazzists’ socialization is inherently musical, and their aesthetic judgments are inherently social. The homology between jazz’s racial origins and Roma’s crucial status in modern Hungarian jazz is explored in great depth, detail, and nuance. Havas’s monograph is of great importance for scholars in cultural sociology, musicology, and jazz studies for his synthesis of diverse theoretical perspectives that help illuminate an expansive historical and ethnographic material. We must moreover welcome his erudition and analytic skills brought to bear on an internationally barely known jazz diaspora in a small semi-peripheral country like Hungary. However, his neglect to address the universally serious issues of gender in jazz and include such acclaimed women artists as Nikoletta Szőke, the late Juli Fábián, or Orsi Urbán – all of them vocalists – is unfortunate. Nonetheless, Havas’s love of Hungarian jazz, its innovators and virtuosos (György Szabados, Mihály Dresch, Gyula Babos, Béla Szakcsi Lakatos, Kálmán Oláh, Ferenc Snétberger, to name a few), lesser-known talents, and promising new hybrids with world music shines through the text. To spark international interest in this scene and this history is an additional benefit of his book.","PeriodicalId":46155,"journal":{"name":"POPULAR MUSIC AND SOCIETY","volume":"46 1","pages":"216 - 218"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"POPULAR MUSIC AND SOCIETY","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/03007766.2023.2169876","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"艺术学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"MUSIC","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
out the book this concept, deriving from postcolonial theory, recurs). The fourth chapter is an inquiry into the abiding polarization between the aesthetic principles, language, and behavioral system characterizing the two adversarial branches of local jazz. Through the prism of Bourdieusian field theory with its emphasis on intra-field struggles for positions, competing hierarchies, and symbolic violence, the overall account of the jazz scene in which authenticity is at stake is rather disheartening. Despite citing selfcritical voices in both camps, Havas suggests that the ethnicized conflict by and large prevents musicians from expressing mutual respect or engaging in musical collaborations and exchanges across generic boundaries. It is interesting, however, that no reference is made to how the domestic jazz culture’s ethnic other, the Jewish minority, has been participating in this “black-and-white” dynamic after the resuscitation of jazz in the 1960s. The last and fifth chapter, titled “Othering Whiteness: Permanence and Change in Romani Musicians’ Jazz Habitus,” is dedicated to the musical socialization of Roma jazzists, the educational and symbolic role of family, kinship, and tradition whereby not only careers but also cultural meanings and identities are formed. Havas points out that, as with African American musicians, Roma jazzists’ socialization is inherently musical, and their aesthetic judgments are inherently social. The homology between jazz’s racial origins and Roma’s crucial status in modern Hungarian jazz is explored in great depth, detail, and nuance. Havas’s monograph is of great importance for scholars in cultural sociology, musicology, and jazz studies for his synthesis of diverse theoretical perspectives that help illuminate an expansive historical and ethnographic material. We must moreover welcome his erudition and analytic skills brought to bear on an internationally barely known jazz diaspora in a small semi-peripheral country like Hungary. However, his neglect to address the universally serious issues of gender in jazz and include such acclaimed women artists as Nikoletta Szőke, the late Juli Fábián, or Orsi Urbán – all of them vocalists – is unfortunate. Nonetheless, Havas’s love of Hungarian jazz, its innovators and virtuosos (György Szabados, Mihály Dresch, Gyula Babos, Béla Szakcsi Lakatos, Kálmán Oláh, Ferenc Snétberger, to name a few), lesser-known talents, and promising new hybrids with world music shines through the text. To spark international interest in this scene and this history is an additional benefit of his book.
在书中,这一源自后殖民理论的概念反复出现。第四章探讨了当地爵士乐中两个对立分支的审美原则、语言和行为体系之间持久的两极分化。通过布尔迪厄场域理论的棱镜,强调场域内的地位斗争、等级竞争和象征暴力,对真实性受到威胁的爵士乐场景的整体描述相当令人沮丧。尽管在这两个阵营中都有自我批评的声音,哈瓦斯认为,种族冲突总体上阻碍了音乐家们表达相互尊重,也阻碍了他们跨界进行音乐合作和交流。然而,有趣的是,书中没有提到国内爵士文化的他者——犹太少数民族,在20世纪60年代爵士乐复苏后是如何参与到这种“非黑即白”的动态中来的。最后也是第五章,题为“其他白人:罗姆音乐家爵士乐习惯的持久性和变化”,致力于罗姆爵士音乐家的音乐社会化,家庭,亲属关系和传统的教育和象征作用,不仅是职业,而且是文化意义和身份的形成。哈瓦斯指出,与非裔美国音乐家一样,罗马爵士音乐家的社会化本质上是音乐性的,他们的审美判断本质上是社会性的。爵士乐的种族起源和罗马在现代匈牙利爵士乐中的重要地位之间的同源性被深入、详细和细微差别地探讨。哈瓦斯的专著对文化社会学、音乐学和爵士乐研究的学者非常重要,因为他综合了不同的理论观点,有助于阐明广泛的历史和民族志材料。此外,我们必须欢迎他的博学和分析能力,为匈牙利这样一个半边缘国家的国际上鲜为人知的爵士乐侨民带来了影响。然而,不幸的是,他忽视了爵士乐中普遍存在的严重的性别问题,并将Nikoletta Szőke、已故的Juli Fábián或Orsi Urbán等广受赞誉的女性艺术家包括在内——她们都是歌手。尽管如此,哈瓦斯对匈牙利爵士乐的热爱,对它的创新者和演奏家的热爱(György Szabados, Mihály Dresch, Gyula Babos, b Szakcsi Lakatos, Kálmán Oláh, Ferenc sntberger,仅举几例),对不太知名的人才的热爱,以及对世界音乐有前途的新混合音乐的热爱,在书中闪耀着光芒。激发国际社会对这一场景和这段历史的兴趣是他的书的另一个好处。
期刊介绍:
Popular Music and Society, founded in 1971, publishes articles, book reviews, and audio reviews on popular music of any genre, time period, or geographic location. Popular Music and Society is open to all scholarly orientations toward popular music, including (but not limited to) historical, theoretical, critical, sociological, and cultural approaches. The terms "popular" and "society" are broadly defined to accommodate a wide range of articles on the subject. Recent and forthcoming Special Issue topics include: Digital Music Delivery, Cover Songs, the Music Monopoly, Jazz, and the Kinks. Popular Music and Society is published five times per year and is a peer-reviewed academic journal supported by an international editorial board.