Grounding Non-Theological Morality: The Victorian Secularist Movement, Secular Ethics, and Human Progress

IF 1.7 Q2 SOCIOLOGY
Patrick J. Corbeil
{"title":"Grounding Non-Theological Morality: The Victorian Secularist Movement, Secular Ethics, and Human Progress","authors":"Patrick J. Corbeil","doi":"10.5334/SNR.93","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article examines the formation of British Secularist ethics in the middle decades of the nineteenth century. The Secularist movement, initiated by George Jacob Holyoake in 1851, was a primarily artisan working-class social movement that sought to ground social ethics upon a rational, scientific, and non-theological foundation. This article examines how the quest for a science of morals informed Secularist expectations and judgements. In this article, I trace how the idea of a rational science of ethics was integrated into the secularist movement. I begin by briefly situating the Secularist movement within the wider moral and epistemological debates of the mid-Victorian period. I address the implications that atheism had on the development of Secularism, and on its contemporary reputation and respectability. I then examine how Holyoake sought to establish the non-theological grounds of morality and the tensions that arose from debates between Secularists regarding the necessity of atheism to Secularism. Finally, I argue that despite significant fissures within the movement created by the question of the necessity of atheism, Secularism nevertheless evinced a high degree of conceptual unity concerning the nature and grounds of morality.","PeriodicalId":42349,"journal":{"name":"Secularism & Nonreligion","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2019-04-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Secularism & Nonreligion","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5334/SNR.93","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SOCIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

This article examines the formation of British Secularist ethics in the middle decades of the nineteenth century. The Secularist movement, initiated by George Jacob Holyoake in 1851, was a primarily artisan working-class social movement that sought to ground social ethics upon a rational, scientific, and non-theological foundation. This article examines how the quest for a science of morals informed Secularist expectations and judgements. In this article, I trace how the idea of a rational science of ethics was integrated into the secularist movement. I begin by briefly situating the Secularist movement within the wider moral and epistemological debates of the mid-Victorian period. I address the implications that atheism had on the development of Secularism, and on its contemporary reputation and respectability. I then examine how Holyoake sought to establish the non-theological grounds of morality and the tensions that arose from debates between Secularists regarding the necessity of atheism to Secularism. Finally, I argue that despite significant fissures within the movement created by the question of the necessity of atheism, Secularism nevertheless evinced a high degree of conceptual unity concerning the nature and grounds of morality.
基于非神学道德:维多利亚世俗主义运动、世俗伦理与人类进步
本文考察了十九世纪中期英国世俗主义伦理的形成。世俗主义运动由乔治·雅各布·霍利亚克于1851年发起,主要是一场工匠工人阶级的社会运动,旨在将社会伦理建立在理性、科学和非神学的基础上。本文探讨了对道德科学的探索如何影响世俗主义者的期望和判断。在这篇文章中,我追溯了理性伦理科学的理念是如何融入世俗主义运动的。首先,我将世俗主义运动置于维多利亚时代中期更广泛的道德和认识论辩论中。我讨论了无神论对世俗主义发展的影响,以及它在当代的声誉和尊严。然后,我考察了霍利亚克如何试图建立道德的非神学基础,以及世俗主义者之间关于无神论对世俗主义的必要性的辩论所产生的紧张局势。最后,我认为,尽管无神论的必要性问题在运动中产生了重大分歧,世俗主义仍然表现出高度的关于道德的性质和基础的概念统一。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
14.30%
发文量
3
审稿时长
9 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信