THE AMENDMENT TO THE LAW REFORM (MARRIAGE AND DIVORCE) ACT 1976: RECONCILING THE IRRECONCILABLE

IF 0.2 Q4 LAW
N. M. Zin, N. A. Hak, Hidayati Mohamed Jani
{"title":"THE AMENDMENT TO THE LAW REFORM (MARRIAGE AND DIVORCE) ACT 1976: RECONCILING THE IRRECONCILABLE","authors":"N. M. Zin, N. A. Hak, Hidayati Mohamed Jani","doi":"10.31436/IIUMLJ.V29I(S1).631","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article examines the ramifications of the recent amendment to the Law Reform (Marriage and Divorce) Act 1976 (Act 164) in protecting the wellbeing of the family relationship involving interfaith marriage and other legal issues governing non-Muslim families. The amendment witnessed substantial reforms to section 51 of Act 164 pertaining to the divorce on the ground of conversion, increasing the age limit for child maintenance and adopting more flexible principles in dividing matrimonial assets. However, the focus will be on the impact of the amendment to section 51 of Act 164 due to its significant in changing the landscape of legal arguments pertaining to jurisdiction of the court in dealing with the subject matter in dispute, ranging from the divorce and other intense arguments pertaining to maintenance of wife, child custody and religious status of children. The study adopts qualitative study in elucidating relevant documents that comprised of statutory laws, articles in legal journals and decided cases where arguments leading to the need for the reform of those affected issues were well addressed.  Certain aspects of Islamic jurisprudence will be referred to and analysed in searching for authoritative and practical legal arguments within the existing legal framework.  Harmonisation of law is adopted whenever applicable when dealing with the resolution of conflict of laws.  It is hoped that this study will provide constructive argument and invaluable source of reference for the Malaysian civil court in disposing of interfaith family disputes when the law is fully enforced.","PeriodicalId":40704,"journal":{"name":"IIUM Law Journal","volume":"29 1","pages":"1-15"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IIUM Law Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31436/IIUMLJ.V29I(S1).631","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article examines the ramifications of the recent amendment to the Law Reform (Marriage and Divorce) Act 1976 (Act 164) in protecting the wellbeing of the family relationship involving interfaith marriage and other legal issues governing non-Muslim families. The amendment witnessed substantial reforms to section 51 of Act 164 pertaining to the divorce on the ground of conversion, increasing the age limit for child maintenance and adopting more flexible principles in dividing matrimonial assets. However, the focus will be on the impact of the amendment to section 51 of Act 164 due to its significant in changing the landscape of legal arguments pertaining to jurisdiction of the court in dealing with the subject matter in dispute, ranging from the divorce and other intense arguments pertaining to maintenance of wife, child custody and religious status of children. The study adopts qualitative study in elucidating relevant documents that comprised of statutory laws, articles in legal journals and decided cases where arguments leading to the need for the reform of those affected issues were well addressed.  Certain aspects of Islamic jurisprudence will be referred to and analysed in searching for authoritative and practical legal arguments within the existing legal framework.  Harmonisation of law is adopted whenever applicable when dealing with the resolution of conflict of laws.  It is hoped that this study will provide constructive argument and invaluable source of reference for the Malaysian civil court in disposing of interfaith family disputes when the law is fully enforced.
1976年法律改革(婚姻和离婚)法案修正案:调和不可调和的矛盾
本文探讨了最近修订的1976年法律改革(婚姻和离婚)法案(第164号法案)在保护涉及跨宗教婚姻和其他非穆斯林家庭法律问题的家庭关系福祉方面的影响。该修正案对第164号法令第51条有关改宗离婚的规定进行了重大改革,提高了抚养子女的年龄限制,并在分割婚姻财产方面采取了更灵活的原则。但是,重点将放在第164号法令第51节修正案的影响上,因为它在改变与法院处理争议主题的管辖权有关的法律论点方面具有重大意义,包括离婚和其他与赡养妻子、子女监护权和子女宗教地位有关的激烈论点。该研究报告采用定性研究的方法来阐明有关文件,这些文件包括成文法、法律期刊上的文章和已判决的案件,其中导致需要改革受影响问题的论点已得到很好的处理。在现有法律框架内寻找权威和实际的法律论据时,将提到和分析伊斯兰法学的某些方面。在处理法律冲突的解决时,在适用的情况下采用法律协调。希望本研究能为马来西亚民事法院在法律全面执行时处理宗教间家庭纠纷提供建设性的论据和宝贵的参考资料。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
50.00%
发文量
7
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信