Advancing dishonourable relations: legal reasoning, Indigenous rights, and strategic uses of reconciliation

Q3 Social Sciences
M. Mccrossan
{"title":"Advancing dishonourable relations: legal reasoning, Indigenous rights, and strategic uses of reconciliation","authors":"M. Mccrossan","doi":"10.1080/07078552.2019.1646454","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This article examines the fluctuating character of legal and political uses of reconciliation, paying particular attention to the Supreme Court of Canada’s (SCC) jurisprudence over the last five years concerning Aboriginal title and treaty rights. This article aims to provide a fuller conception of the sociocultural relations of power entrenched within the legal domain by engaging with the logics and representations of reconciliation found in the Court’s decisions and respective hearing transcripts.","PeriodicalId":39831,"journal":{"name":"Studies in Political Economy","volume":"100 1","pages":"110 - 93"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-05-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/07078552.2019.1646454","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Studies in Political Economy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/07078552.2019.1646454","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Abstract This article examines the fluctuating character of legal and political uses of reconciliation, paying particular attention to the Supreme Court of Canada’s (SCC) jurisprudence over the last five years concerning Aboriginal title and treaty rights. This article aims to provide a fuller conception of the sociocultural relations of power entrenched within the legal domain by engaging with the logics and representations of reconciliation found in the Court’s decisions and respective hearing transcripts.
推进不名誉关系:法律推理、土著权利和和解的战略利用
摘要本文考察了和解的法律和政治用途的波动特征,特别关注加拿大最高法院(SCC)在过去五年中关于原住民所有权和条约权利的判例。本文的目的是通过在法院的判决和各自的听证笔录中发现和解的逻辑和表现,对法律领域内根深蒂固的权力的社会文化关系提供一个更全面的概念。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Studies in Political Economy
Studies in Political Economy Social Sciences-Political Science and International Relations
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
12
期刊介绍: Studies in Political Economy is an interdisciplinary journal committed to the publication of original work in the various traditions of socialist political economy. Researchers and analysts within these traditions seek to understand how political, economic and cultural processes and struggles interact to shape and reshape the conditions of people"s lives.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信