Arthroscopic Debridement for Treatment of Chronic Dynamic Scaphoid Instability.

Pub Date : 2023-08-17 eCollection Date: 2024-08-01 DOI:10.1055/s-0043-1769934
Cyrus Steppe, Houshang Seradge, Winfred Parker, Carrie Seradge, Kian Steppe, Kamran Steppe
{"title":"Arthroscopic Debridement for Treatment of Chronic Dynamic Scaphoid Instability.","authors":"Cyrus Steppe, Houshang Seradge, Winfred Parker, Carrie Seradge, Kian Steppe, Kamran Steppe","doi":"10.1055/s-0043-1769934","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background</b>  There is a paucity of information on minimal surgical intervention for the treatment of chronic dynamic scaphoid instability (CDSI) that will achieve an acceptable mid-term result. <b>Purpose</b>  We hypothesize that by following a debride-first-then-wait protocol, some patients with CDSI can be treated with arthroscopic debridement alone and avoid a reconstructive procedure. <b>Patients and Methods</b>  We performed a retrospective, longitudinal study from January 2008 to December 2018 of all patients diagnosed with CDSI and treated with arthroscopic debridement of the scapholunate interosseous ligament. In all cases, a debride-first-then-wait protocol was followed that included a predetermined wait period after arthroscopic debridement, giving the patient a chance to experience possible symptom improvement. This approach integrated the patient's perceived wellness into the decision-making process. All wrists that remained symptomatic or experienced recurrence of symptoms were treated with a reconstructive procedure. The wrists were divided into two groups: arthroscopic debridement only (ADO) and reconstructive procedure (RP). <b>Results</b>  Seventy-nine wrists (72 patients) of 191 consecutive wrist arthroscopies met the inclusion criteria. The ADO group consisted of 43 wrists (54%). An average of 6.3 years later (range: 2-11 years), these patients remained satisfied with the results of the arthroscopic debridement and did not want further treatment. The RP group included 36 wrists (46%) with 91.7% of reconstructive surgeries occurring within 6 months of the arthroscopy. With a mid-term follow-up, 75% of Geissler grade II ligament tears, 48% of grade III tears, and 39% of grade IV tears were successfully treated with arthroscopic debridement alone and avoided a reconstructive surgery. <b>Conclusion</b>  By adopting a debride-first-then-wait protocol, some patients with CDSI can be treated with a more limited intervention, arthroscopic debridement. In this series, 54% of wrists with CDSI avoided a reconstructive surgery for an average of 6.3 years. <b>Type of Study / Level of Evidence</b>  Case Series, Level IV.</p>","PeriodicalId":0,"journal":{"name":"","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-08-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11254479/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0043-1769934","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/8/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background  There is a paucity of information on minimal surgical intervention for the treatment of chronic dynamic scaphoid instability (CDSI) that will achieve an acceptable mid-term result. Purpose  We hypothesize that by following a debride-first-then-wait protocol, some patients with CDSI can be treated with arthroscopic debridement alone and avoid a reconstructive procedure. Patients and Methods  We performed a retrospective, longitudinal study from January 2008 to December 2018 of all patients diagnosed with CDSI and treated with arthroscopic debridement of the scapholunate interosseous ligament. In all cases, a debride-first-then-wait protocol was followed that included a predetermined wait period after arthroscopic debridement, giving the patient a chance to experience possible symptom improvement. This approach integrated the patient's perceived wellness into the decision-making process. All wrists that remained symptomatic or experienced recurrence of symptoms were treated with a reconstructive procedure. The wrists were divided into two groups: arthroscopic debridement only (ADO) and reconstructive procedure (RP). Results  Seventy-nine wrists (72 patients) of 191 consecutive wrist arthroscopies met the inclusion criteria. The ADO group consisted of 43 wrists (54%). An average of 6.3 years later (range: 2-11 years), these patients remained satisfied with the results of the arthroscopic debridement and did not want further treatment. The RP group included 36 wrists (46%) with 91.7% of reconstructive surgeries occurring within 6 months of the arthroscopy. With a mid-term follow-up, 75% of Geissler grade II ligament tears, 48% of grade III tears, and 39% of grade IV tears were successfully treated with arthroscopic debridement alone and avoided a reconstructive surgery. Conclusion  By adopting a debride-first-then-wait protocol, some patients with CDSI can be treated with a more limited intervention, arthroscopic debridement. In this series, 54% of wrists with CDSI avoided a reconstructive surgery for an average of 6.3 years. Type of Study / Level of Evidence  Case Series, Level IV.

分享
查看原文
关节镜下清创治疗慢性动态舟状骨不稳
摘要背景 目前缺乏关于治疗慢性动态舟状骨不稳定(CDSI)的最小手术干预的信息,这些干预将获得可接受的中期结果。意图 我们假设,通过遵循先清创后等待的方案,一些CDSI患者可以单独进行关节镜清创治疗,避免重建手术。患者和方法 我们从2008年1月至2018年12月对所有诊断为CDSI并接受关节镜下骨间舟骨韧带清创术治疗的患者进行了一项回顾性纵向研究。在所有情况下,都遵循先清创后等待的方案,其中包括关节镜清创术后的预定等待期,让患者有机会体验可能的症状改善。这种方法将患者感知到的健康融入决策过程。所有仍有症状或症状复发的手腕都接受了重建手术治疗。将腕关节分为两组:单纯关节镜下清创术(ADO)和重建术(RP)。后果 191个连续腕关节镜检查中有79个腕关节(72名患者)符合纳入标准。ADO组包括43个手腕(54%)。平均6.3年后(范围:2-11年),这些患者对关节镜清创术的结果仍然满意,不需要进一步治疗。RP组包括36个手腕(46%),91.7%的重建手术发生在关节镜检查的6个月内。在中期随访中,75%的Geissler II级韧带撕裂、48%的III级撕裂和39%的IV级撕裂仅通过关节镜清创术成功治疗,避免了重建手术。结论 通过采用先清创后等待的方案,一些CDSI患者可以接受更有限的干预,即关节镜清创术。在这个系列中,54%患有CDSI的手腕在平均6.3年内避免了重建手术。研究类型/证据水平 案例系列,四级。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信