Chemometric Tools in the Analysis of Pharmaceutics Samples: a Comparison Among Several Multivariate Calibration Methods

Q4 Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
N. Ornelas-Soto, J. A. Duarte-Moller, J. Amador-Hernández, A. Rivera-Gomez, Rafael Pacheco , Contreras, R. Ochoa, Ignacio Yocupicio , Villegas, P. López-de-Alba
{"title":"Chemometric Tools in the Analysis of Pharmaceutics Samples: a Comparison Among Several Multivariate Calibration Methods","authors":"N. Ornelas-Soto, J. A. Duarte-Moller, J. Amador-Hernández, A. Rivera-Gomez, Rafael Pacheco , Contreras, R. Ochoa, Ignacio Yocupicio , Villegas, P. López-de-Alba","doi":"10.46300/91011.2022.16.38","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Bivariate calibration algorithm is compared with the results obtained by the usage of high-dimensional calibration methods such as partial least squares (PLS) and multi-way partial least-squares (N-PLS) by using UV-Vis spectrophotometric data of first and second-order. The algorithms were applied to the determination of a mixture of an analgesic and a stimulant compound and their actual concentrations of them were calculated by using spectroscopic data. The direct reading of absorbance values at 227 nm and 271 nm were employed for quantification of the compounds in the case of the bivariate method. The approaches of first-order and multi-way methods were applied with a previous optimization of the calibration matrix by constructing sets of calibration and validation with 20 and 10 samples (mixtures) respectively according to a central composite design and their UV absorption spectra were recorded at 200-350 nm. All algorithms were satisfactorily applied to the simultaneous determination of these compounds in pharmaceutical formulations with mean percentage recovery of 100.5 ± 3.67, 98.7 ± 3.42, and 100.5 ± 3.74 for bivariate, PLS-1, and N-PLS, respectively. The statistical evaluation of the bivariate method showed that this procedure is comparable with those algorithms that employ high-dimensional structured information. The aim of the work is to compare the methods under study and it can be seen that there are no significant differences, so a simple spectrophotometer can be used up to a very specialized one. However, the advantage of bivariate calibration is its simplicity, due to the minimal experimental manipulation.","PeriodicalId":53488,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Biology and Biomedical Engineering","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Biology and Biomedical Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.46300/91011.2022.16.38","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Bivariate calibration algorithm is compared with the results obtained by the usage of high-dimensional calibration methods such as partial least squares (PLS) and multi-way partial least-squares (N-PLS) by using UV-Vis spectrophotometric data of first and second-order. The algorithms were applied to the determination of a mixture of an analgesic and a stimulant compound and their actual concentrations of them were calculated by using spectroscopic data. The direct reading of absorbance values at 227 nm and 271 nm were employed for quantification of the compounds in the case of the bivariate method. The approaches of first-order and multi-way methods were applied with a previous optimization of the calibration matrix by constructing sets of calibration and validation with 20 and 10 samples (mixtures) respectively according to a central composite design and their UV absorption spectra were recorded at 200-350 nm. All algorithms were satisfactorily applied to the simultaneous determination of these compounds in pharmaceutical formulations with mean percentage recovery of 100.5 ± 3.67, 98.7 ± 3.42, and 100.5 ± 3.74 for bivariate, PLS-1, and N-PLS, respectively. The statistical evaluation of the bivariate method showed that this procedure is comparable with those algorithms that employ high-dimensional structured information. The aim of the work is to compare the methods under study and it can be seen that there are no significant differences, so a simple spectrophotometer can be used up to a very specialized one. However, the advantage of bivariate calibration is its simplicity, due to the minimal experimental manipulation.
药物样品分析中的化学计量工具:几种多变量校准方法的比较
通过使用一阶和二阶UV-Vis分光光度数据,将双变量校准算法与通过使用高维校准方法(如偏最小二乘(PLS)和多路偏最小二乘(N-PLS))获得的结果进行比较。将该算法应用于镇痛剂和兴奋剂化合物的混合物的测定,并通过使用光谱数据计算它们的实际浓度。在二元法的情况下,采用227nm和271nm处吸光度值的直接读数来定量化合物。根据中心复合材料设计,通过分别用20个和10个样品(混合物)构建校准和验证集,将一阶和多向方法应用于校准矩阵的先前优化,并在200-350nm处记录它们的紫外线吸收光谱。所有算法都令人满意地应用于药物制剂中这些化合物的同时测定,双变量、PLS-1和N-PLS的平均回收率分别为100.5±3.67、98.7±3.42和100.5±3.74。对二元方法的统计评估表明,该方法与那些使用高维结构化信息的算法是可比较的。这项工作的目的是比较所研究的方法,可以看出没有显著差异,因此可以使用一个简单的分光光度计来达到一个非常专业的分光计。然而,由于实验操作最少,双变量校准的优点是简单。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Journal of Biology and Biomedical Engineering
International Journal of Biology and Biomedical Engineering Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology-Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology (all)
自引率
0.00%
发文量
42
期刊介绍: Topics: Molecular Dynamics, Biochemistry, Biophysics, Quantum Chemistry, Molecular Biology, Cell Biology, Immunology, Neurophysiology, Genetics, Population Dynamics, Dynamics of Diseases, Bioecology, Epidemiology, Social Dynamics, PhotoBiology, PhotoChemistry, Plant Biology, Microbiology, Immunology, Bioinformatics, Signal Transduction, Environmental Systems, Psychological and Cognitive Systems, Pattern Formation, Evolution, Game Theory and Adaptive Dynamics, Bioengineering, Biotechnolgies, Medical Imaging, Medical Signal Processing, Feedback Control in Biology and Chemistry, Fluid Mechanics and Applications in Biomedicine, Space Medicine and Biology, Nuclear Biology and Medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信