HOAX AND THE CRISIS OF HEALTH COMMUNICATION-PUBLIC SPHERE

Winanti Praptiningsih, N. Kurnia
{"title":"HOAX AND THE CRISIS OF HEALTH COMMUNICATION-PUBLIC SPHERE","authors":"Winanti Praptiningsih, N. Kurnia","doi":"10.36782/jcs.v10i1.2002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Digital media development makes easier for everyone to share information. One of the visible characteristics is the change of audience role to be more active in the convergence era. At this point, hoax comes, such as vaccine danger which massively spreads in 2017-2018. The hoax case content is about kinds of concern, such as health clinical sense, work of digital media, to religious dogma. The article studies the vaccine danger polemic in 2017-2018, from the kinds of hoax appearance to the crisis of the health communication-public sphere in the digital era. This study finds that:  First, new media offers people more personal communication space where they can be a consumer and producer of information at once. Second, a clinical sense of health becomes a claim for being right that makes people trust scientific logic and eliminate critical attitude to manipulative works.  Third, the health information gap and lack of people's understanding of medical and technical terms make them active consumers who look for information independently through digital media.  Fourth, people concern about health information needs so they pay attention to see, read, and even share information. Fifth, hoax with certain interest tends to purpose on fake news that spreads in social media massively. Sixth, insufficient digital literacy in society makes them lost in mass information in the new media era. To cite this article (7 th APA style): Praptiningsih, W. & Kurnia, N. (2020). Hoax and the Crisis of Communication-Public Sphere. Journal Communication Spectrum, 10 (1), 1-9. http://doi.org/10.36782/jcs.v10i1.2002","PeriodicalId":52783,"journal":{"name":"Journal Communication Spectrum","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-02-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal Communication Spectrum","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36782/jcs.v10i1.2002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Digital media development makes easier for everyone to share information. One of the visible characteristics is the change of audience role to be more active in the convergence era. At this point, hoax comes, such as vaccine danger which massively spreads in 2017-2018. The hoax case content is about kinds of concern, such as health clinical sense, work of digital media, to religious dogma. The article studies the vaccine danger polemic in 2017-2018, from the kinds of hoax appearance to the crisis of the health communication-public sphere in the digital era. This study finds that:  First, new media offers people more personal communication space where they can be a consumer and producer of information at once. Second, a clinical sense of health becomes a claim for being right that makes people trust scientific logic and eliminate critical attitude to manipulative works.  Third, the health information gap and lack of people's understanding of medical and technical terms make them active consumers who look for information independently through digital media.  Fourth, people concern about health information needs so they pay attention to see, read, and even share information. Fifth, hoax with certain interest tends to purpose on fake news that spreads in social media massively. Sixth, insufficient digital literacy in society makes them lost in mass information in the new media era. To cite this article (7 th APA style): Praptiningsih, W. & Kurnia, N. (2020). Hoax and the Crisis of Communication-Public Sphere. Journal Communication Spectrum, 10 (1), 1-9. http://doi.org/10.36782/jcs.v10i1.2002
恶作剧与卫生传播危机——公共领域
数字媒体的发展使每个人都更容易分享信息。其中一个明显的特征是受众角色在融合时代的转变更加活跃。在这一点上,恶作剧来了,比如在2017-2018年大规模传播的疫苗危险。恶作剧案例内容涉及健康临床意识、数字媒体工作、宗教教义等各种关注点。本文研究了2017-2018年的疫苗危险争论,从各种恶作剧的出现到数字时代卫生传播公共领域的危机。本研究发现:第一,新媒体为人们提供了更多的个人交流空间,人们可以同时成为信息的消费者和生产者。第二,临床的健康意识成为一种正确的主张,使人们相信科学逻辑,消除对操纵作品的批判态度。第三,健康信息的差距和人们对医学和技术术语的理解不足,使他们成为积极的消费者,他们通过数字媒体独立寻找信息。第四,人们关注健康信息的需求,所以他们会注意查看、阅读甚至分享信息。第五,有一定兴趣的骗局往往以在社交媒体上大量传播的假新闻为目的。第六,社会数字素养的不足使他们迷失在新媒体时代的海量信息中。引用本文(第七APA风格):Praptiningsih, W. & Kurnia, N.(2020)。骗局与传播危机——公共领域。通信学报,2010,31(1):1-9。http://doi.org/10.36782/jcs.v10i1.2002
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
16
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信