Complex, practical or inflexible? Unravelling the background and consequences of the NSW standard instrument local environmental plan

IF 1.2 Q2 Social Sciences
M. Fallding, Andrew Kelly
{"title":"Complex, practical or inflexible? Unravelling the background and consequences of the NSW standard instrument local environmental plan","authors":"M. Fallding, Andrew Kelly","doi":"10.1080/07293682.2023.2185645","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT The 2006 NSW Standard Instrument Local Environmental Plan (SI LEP) aimed to simplify and bring consistency to local planning and land use regulation. Consistent definitions and standard land use zones were features of the changes to local plan requirements. The background to, and unfortunate consequences of, the SI LEP are critically explored. This highlights the tension between conformity, innovation, local autonomy and place-based approaches. A survey of professional practitioners suggests that the hoped-for benefits have not been realised in practice. Key findings are that the SI LEP: (1) has added complexity and length to regulatory plans, (2) increased state government power with no demonstrated land use benefit, (3) is not necessary for consistent state planning and policy implementation, and (4) stifles local creativity, flexibility and place-based land use outcomes especially in non-metropolitan areas. Significant limitations of the SI LEP and its implementation warrant a rethink of statutory land use controls in NSW, including land zoning and plan objectives, land use definitions, and opportunities to support local innovation.","PeriodicalId":45599,"journal":{"name":"Australian Planner","volume":"59 1","pages":"14 - 25"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian Planner","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/07293682.2023.2185645","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

ABSTRACT The 2006 NSW Standard Instrument Local Environmental Plan (SI LEP) aimed to simplify and bring consistency to local planning and land use regulation. Consistent definitions and standard land use zones were features of the changes to local plan requirements. The background to, and unfortunate consequences of, the SI LEP are critically explored. This highlights the tension between conformity, innovation, local autonomy and place-based approaches. A survey of professional practitioners suggests that the hoped-for benefits have not been realised in practice. Key findings are that the SI LEP: (1) has added complexity and length to regulatory plans, (2) increased state government power with no demonstrated land use benefit, (3) is not necessary for consistent state planning and policy implementation, and (4) stifles local creativity, flexibility and place-based land use outcomes especially in non-metropolitan areas. Significant limitations of the SI LEP and its implementation warrant a rethink of statutory land use controls in NSW, including land zoning and plan objectives, land use definitions, and opportunities to support local innovation.
复杂、实用还是不灵活?揭开新南威尔士州标准仪器地方环境计划的背景和后果
摘要2006年新南威尔士州标准仪器地方环境规划(SI LEP)旨在简化地方规划和土地利用法规,并使其保持一致。一致的定义和标准土地使用区是地方规划要求变化的特点。对SI LEP的背景和不幸后果进行了批判性的探讨。这突出了整合、创新、地方自治和基于地方的方法之间的紧张关系。一项针对专业从业者的调查表明,所希望的好处在实践中并没有实现。关键发现是,SI LEP:(1)增加了监管计划的复杂性和长度,(2)增加了州政府权力,但没有证明土地利用效益,(3)不需要连贯的州规划和政策实施,(4)扼杀了当地的创造力、灵活性和基于地方的土地利用成果,尤其是在非大都市地区。SI LEP及其实施的重大局限性需要重新思考新南威尔士州的法定土地使用控制,包括土地分区和规划目标、土地使用定义以及支持当地创新的机会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Australian Planner
Australian Planner REGIONAL & URBAN PLANNING-
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
12
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信