Celebrating feminist responses to populist politics

IF 0.7 4区 文学 Q3 CULTURAL STUDIES
Greta Olson
{"title":"Celebrating feminist responses to populist politics","authors":"Greta Olson","doi":"10.1080/13825577.2021.1953065","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"When I began teaching feminist and sexuality studies in Germany many years ago, I needed to learn about the variety of feminist movements that in no way resembled the second-wave in US America, in which I had been acculturated. Part of this learning consisted in recognising that the wave metaphor, used so typically to characterise the history of feminist movements in the UK and the US, fits the history of other feminist movements only poorly. This is true for Germany, before and after reunification in 1989, for the Northern European countries, and for those geopolitical contexts about whose feminisms I knew far less. This includes South European and post-Yugoslavian articulations of feminisms, such as those in Croatia and elsewhere. My personal education of engaging with feminisms different from ones in my country of origin may mirror the reader’s experience of this issue. The voices assembled in this issue speak primarily from the perspective of South Europe. These voices articulate themselves at a particular moment of time – when minoritized communities are feeling the conjoined forces of the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic, and a surge of anti-feminist and anti-queer and anti-trans initiatives within Europe and beyond, and while the Mediterranean remains a grave for migrant persons. “Feminist responses to populist politics” invites Anglophone readers to enter into forms of feminist resistance taking place in Mediterranean countries, as activists react to the pandemic and a variety of nationalist and ethno-nationalist initiatives that have chosen feminists and queer and trans persons as their preferred enemies. The essays gathered here reflect on feminist-activist work in Catalunya, in Spain, in Italy, and in Croatia, and the dissemination of feminist topoi beyond these geopolitical areas. The authors are activists, and the guest editors and the contributors dispel with some common misrepresentations of feminists today. One concerns feminism’s supposed exclusions of intersectional and anti-racist viewpoints, and of trans women and non-binary persons. Each of the essays that appears in this issue speaks for inclusive intersectional feminisms. One champions a form of “resilient feminism”, meant here not in the sense of a neo-liberal Lean-In brand of feminism that insists that individual women just need to try harder. Rather, resilient feminism is understood as an adaptive response to new iterations of neo-liberal power in disruption. In their composition, with one more mature and two younger feminist scholars, the guest editors unite in countering a second negative narrative that feminists are divided generationally. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ENGLISH STUDIES 2021, VOL. 25, NO. 2, 111–112 https://doi.org/10.1080/13825577.2021.1953065","PeriodicalId":43819,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of English Studies","volume":"25 1","pages":"111 - 112"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/13825577.2021.1953065","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of English Studies","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13825577.2021.1953065","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CULTURAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

When I began teaching feminist and sexuality studies in Germany many years ago, I needed to learn about the variety of feminist movements that in no way resembled the second-wave in US America, in which I had been acculturated. Part of this learning consisted in recognising that the wave metaphor, used so typically to characterise the history of feminist movements in the UK and the US, fits the history of other feminist movements only poorly. This is true for Germany, before and after reunification in 1989, for the Northern European countries, and for those geopolitical contexts about whose feminisms I knew far less. This includes South European and post-Yugoslavian articulations of feminisms, such as those in Croatia and elsewhere. My personal education of engaging with feminisms different from ones in my country of origin may mirror the reader’s experience of this issue. The voices assembled in this issue speak primarily from the perspective of South Europe. These voices articulate themselves at a particular moment of time – when minoritized communities are feeling the conjoined forces of the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic, and a surge of anti-feminist and anti-queer and anti-trans initiatives within Europe and beyond, and while the Mediterranean remains a grave for migrant persons. “Feminist responses to populist politics” invites Anglophone readers to enter into forms of feminist resistance taking place in Mediterranean countries, as activists react to the pandemic and a variety of nationalist and ethno-nationalist initiatives that have chosen feminists and queer and trans persons as their preferred enemies. The essays gathered here reflect on feminist-activist work in Catalunya, in Spain, in Italy, and in Croatia, and the dissemination of feminist topoi beyond these geopolitical areas. The authors are activists, and the guest editors and the contributors dispel with some common misrepresentations of feminists today. One concerns feminism’s supposed exclusions of intersectional and anti-racist viewpoints, and of trans women and non-binary persons. Each of the essays that appears in this issue speaks for inclusive intersectional feminisms. One champions a form of “resilient feminism”, meant here not in the sense of a neo-liberal Lean-In brand of feminism that insists that individual women just need to try harder. Rather, resilient feminism is understood as an adaptive response to new iterations of neo-liberal power in disruption. In their composition, with one more mature and two younger feminist scholars, the guest editors unite in countering a second negative narrative that feminists are divided generationally. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ENGLISH STUDIES 2021, VOL. 25, NO. 2, 111–112 https://doi.org/10.1080/13825577.2021.1953065
庆祝女权主义对民粹主义政治的回应
多年前,当我开始在德国教授女权主义和性研究时,我需要了解各种各样的女权主义运动,这些运动与美国的第二次浪潮完全不同,在那次浪潮中,我已经适应了文化。这一学习的一部分是认识到,波浪隐喻与其他女权主义运动的历史非常不吻合。波浪隐喻通常用于描述英国和美国的女权主义运动历史。1989年德国统一前后,北欧国家,以及那些我对其女性主义知之甚少的地缘政治背景,都是如此。这包括南欧和后南斯拉夫对女权主义者的阐述,比如克罗地亚和其他地方的女权主义者。我对不同于我原籍国女性主义者的个人教育可能反映了读者对这个问题的体验。在这个问题上聚集的声音主要是从南欧的角度发言的。这些声音是在一个特殊的时刻表达出来的——当少数民族社区感受到新冠肺炎疫情的影响,以及欧洲内外反女权主义、反酷儿和反跨性别倡议的激增,而地中海仍然是移民的坟墓时。“女权主义对民粹主义政治的回应”邀请英语读者参与地中海国家发生的女权主义抵抗形式,因为活动人士对疫情和各种民族主义和民族主义倡议做出了反应,这些倡议选择了女权主义者、酷儿和跨性别者作为他们的首选敌人。聚集在这里的文章反映了加泰罗尼亚、西班牙、意大利和克罗地亚的女权主义活动家工作,以及女权主义拓扑在这些地缘政治领域之外的传播。作者都是活动家,客座编辑和撰稿人用当今女权主义者的一些常见误传来消除这种误解。其中一个问题涉及女权主义对交叉和反种族主义观点以及跨性别女性和非二元人群的排斥。本期发表的每一篇文章都代表了包容性的交叉女性主义。其中一种主张一种形式的“弹性女权主义”,在这里指的不是新自由主义的Lean in女权主义品牌,该品牌坚持认为女性个人只需要更加努力。相反,弹性女权主义被理解为对新自由主义力量在颠覆中的新迭代的适应性反应。在他们的作品中,客座编辑们与一位更成熟的女权主义学者和两位更年轻的学者联合起来,反对女权主义者世代分裂的第二种负面叙事。《欧洲英语研究杂志2021》,第25卷,第2期,111–112https://doi.org/10.1080/13825577.2021.1953065
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
20.00%
发文量
17
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信