Scenes of subjection: Extractive frontiers, symbolic violence, dispossession

IF 3.4 2区 社会学 Q1 GEOGRAPHY
Gediminas Lesutis
{"title":"Scenes of subjection: Extractive frontiers, symbolic violence, dispossession","authors":"Gediminas Lesutis","doi":"10.1016/j.geoforum.2023.103681","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This article discusses how, besides structural and direct modes of violence traditionally attributed to natural resource exploitation, extractive frontiers also unfold through material and affective registers of <em>symbolic violence</em>. This concerns the violence of capital that promises a “better life” whose actual realisation, directly implicated in circuits of “free” market economy, is constantly deferred to the future. Empirically grounded in experiences of dispossession and resettlement caused by coal extraction in Tete, Mozambique, the article employs <em>symbolic violence</em> as an analytic to understand subjectivation constituted by the failed promise of “development” of Tete’s extractive frontier. This, the article argues, results in specific <em>scenes of subjection</em> – exposure to the symbolic violence of extractivism, as well as potential contestations of it, through which those dispossessed by mining come into being as subjects of power. These <em>scenes of subjection</em> are temporal: they transform –<!--> <!-->expand, flutter, retreat – reflecting broader, inherently unstable economies of extraction. As such, subjection to violence is not final but remains susceptible to contestation, mediation, or escalation. Nevertheless, the article shows how, in spite of this potentiality of change, until recently, in Tete <em>symbolic violence</em> had justified, reproduced, and sustained the power of extractivism, as well as of capital more broadly, even within the lifeworlds dispossessed, or otherwise laid to waste, by extractive frontiers of capital.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":12497,"journal":{"name":"Geoforum","volume":"148 ","pages":"Article 103681"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0016718523000076/pdfft?md5=7a8c0a6feb4b7f7e77f4a579794d5268&pid=1-s2.0-S0016718523000076-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geoforum","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0016718523000076","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article discusses how, besides structural and direct modes of violence traditionally attributed to natural resource exploitation, extractive frontiers also unfold through material and affective registers of symbolic violence. This concerns the violence of capital that promises a “better life” whose actual realisation, directly implicated in circuits of “free” market economy, is constantly deferred to the future. Empirically grounded in experiences of dispossession and resettlement caused by coal extraction in Tete, Mozambique, the article employs symbolic violence as an analytic to understand subjectivation constituted by the failed promise of “development” of Tete’s extractive frontier. This, the article argues, results in specific scenes of subjection – exposure to the symbolic violence of extractivism, as well as potential contestations of it, through which those dispossessed by mining come into being as subjects of power. These scenes of subjection are temporal: they transform – expand, flutter, retreat – reflecting broader, inherently unstable economies of extraction. As such, subjection to violence is not final but remains susceptible to contestation, mediation, or escalation. Nevertheless, the article shows how, in spite of this potentiality of change, until recently, in Tete symbolic violence had justified, reproduced, and sustained the power of extractivism, as well as of capital more broadly, even within the lifeworlds dispossessed, or otherwise laid to waste, by extractive frontiers of capital.

服从的场景:掠夺性的边界、象征性的暴力、剥夺
本文讨论了除了传统上归因于自然资源开采的结构性暴力和直接暴力模式之外,采掘疆界还如何通过象征性暴力的物质和情感形式展开。这涉及到资本的暴力,资本承诺 "更美好的生活",但其实际实现直接牵涉到 "自由 "市场经济的循环中,并不断被推迟到未来。文章以莫桑比克太特煤炭开采造成的剥夺和重新安置的经验为基础,采用象征性暴力作为分析方法,来理解太特采掘边界 "发展 "承诺失败所构成的主体化。文章认为,这导致了特定的臣服场景--暴露于采掘业的象征性暴力以及对这种暴力的潜在抗争,通过这些场景,那些被采矿业剥夺了财产的人成为了权力的主体。这些受制于暴力的场景具有时间性:它们不断变化--扩张、浮动、消退--反映了更广泛的、本质上不稳定的采掘经济。因此,对暴力的臣服并不是最终的,而是容易受到争论、调解或升级的影响。然而,文章表明,尽管存在这种变化的可能性,但直到最近,在太特,象征性暴力如何证明采掘业以及更广泛意义上的资本的力量是合理的、再生产的和持续的,甚至在被资本的采掘疆界剥夺或以其他方式浪费掉的生活世界中也是如此。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Geoforum
Geoforum GEOGRAPHY-
CiteScore
7.30
自引率
5.70%
发文量
201
期刊介绍: Geoforum is an international, inter-disciplinary journal, global in outlook, and integrative in approach. The broad focus of Geoforum is the organisation of economic, political, social and environmental systems through space and over time. Areas of study range from the analysis of the global political economy and environment, through national systems of regulation and governance, to urban and regional development, local economic and urban planning and resources management. The journal also includes a Critical Review section which features critical assessments of research in all the above areas.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信