Managing Inclusive Instructional Settings: Technology, Cooperative Planning, and Team-Based Organization.

J. Langone
{"title":"Managing Inclusive Instructional Settings: Technology, Cooperative Planning, and Team-Based Organization.","authors":"J. Langone","doi":"10.17161/FOEC.V30I8.6762","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"As we move closer to the beginning of a new century, instructional options for students with disabilities are becoming more prevalent in classes frequented by their typical peers. Over the past 10 years, reform in education has stimulated a commitment by many general and special educators to teach learners with disabilities in natural educational environments. The commitment to teach students entirely in general education classes is by no means universal, and debates rage on concerning the appropriateness of such options for all learners with special needs (Cipani, 1995). The willingness, however, to determine if total inclusion is a viable option for students is now more prevalent than ever before. From the inception of PL 94-142 in the mid 1970s to the current reauthorization of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA), the concept of least restrictive environment (LRE) has been the cornerstone for understanding the current move toward more inclusive environments for students with special needs. In the past, parents and professionals occasionally misinterpreted the philosophy of the LRE. Basically, living and learning in the least restrictive environment means that individuals with disabilities have the right to participate in environments as close to normal as possible. Each situation is determined by a student's strengths and weaknesses. Originally, the principle of least restrictive environment was developed to offset the practice of placing learners in self-contained settings when their needs did not dictate placement in those environments (Langone, 1990). In addition, the principle of LRE held that individuals in residential settings should have educational goals designed to assist them in moving to less restrictive settings as soon as possible. The principle of least restrictive environment applies to all learners. For example, students with mild cognitive disabilities who have the skills to participate in general classes with support from special educators should be placed there fulltime. Similarly, learners with severe disabilities should not be placed in residential programs if they can benefit from being in public school classes. As a philosophy, least restrictive environment has emphasized the fluid nature of special education programs, and this philosophy can be considered the prelude to the current inclusive movement. For many reasons, inclusive environments have become increasingly popular in school systems across the United States. Some of these reasons are supported by research, and others","PeriodicalId":89924,"journal":{"name":"Focus on exceptional children","volume":"30 1","pages":"1-15"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.17161/FOEC.V30I8.6762","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Focus on exceptional children","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17161/FOEC.V30I8.6762","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

As we move closer to the beginning of a new century, instructional options for students with disabilities are becoming more prevalent in classes frequented by their typical peers. Over the past 10 years, reform in education has stimulated a commitment by many general and special educators to teach learners with disabilities in natural educational environments. The commitment to teach students entirely in general education classes is by no means universal, and debates rage on concerning the appropriateness of such options for all learners with special needs (Cipani, 1995). The willingness, however, to determine if total inclusion is a viable option for students is now more prevalent than ever before. From the inception of PL 94-142 in the mid 1970s to the current reauthorization of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA), the concept of least restrictive environment (LRE) has been the cornerstone for understanding the current move toward more inclusive environments for students with special needs. In the past, parents and professionals occasionally misinterpreted the philosophy of the LRE. Basically, living and learning in the least restrictive environment means that individuals with disabilities have the right to participate in environments as close to normal as possible. Each situation is determined by a student's strengths and weaknesses. Originally, the principle of least restrictive environment was developed to offset the practice of placing learners in self-contained settings when their needs did not dictate placement in those environments (Langone, 1990). In addition, the principle of LRE held that individuals in residential settings should have educational goals designed to assist them in moving to less restrictive settings as soon as possible. The principle of least restrictive environment applies to all learners. For example, students with mild cognitive disabilities who have the skills to participate in general classes with support from special educators should be placed there fulltime. Similarly, learners with severe disabilities should not be placed in residential programs if they can benefit from being in public school classes. As a philosophy, least restrictive environment has emphasized the fluid nature of special education programs, and this philosophy can be considered the prelude to the current inclusive movement. For many reasons, inclusive environments have become increasingly popular in school systems across the United States. Some of these reasons are supported by research, and others
管理包容性教学环境:技术、合作计划和团队组织。
随着我们接近新世纪的开始,残疾学生的教学选择在他们典型同龄人经常光顾的课堂上变得越来越普遍。在过去10年中,教育改革促使许多普通和特殊教育工作者致力于在自然教育环境中教授残疾学生。完全在普通教育课堂上教授学生的承诺绝非普遍,关于这种选择是否适合所有有特殊需求的学习者的争论愈演愈烈(Cipani,1995)。然而,现在比以往任何时候都更普遍地愿意确定全面包容是否是学生的可行选择。从20世纪70年代中期PL 94-142的制定到目前《残疾人教育法》(IDEA)的重新授权,限制最少环境(LRE)的概念一直是理解当前为有特殊需求的学生提供更具包容性的环境的基石。过去,家长和专业人士偶尔会误解LRE的理念。基本上,在限制最少的环境中生活和学习意味着残疾人有权参与尽可能接近正常的环境。每种情况都由学生的长处和短处决定。最初,制定限制最少的环境原则是为了抵消将学习者安置在独立环境中的做法,而他们的需求并没有决定在这些环境中的安置(Langone,1990)。此外,LRE的原则认为,居住环境中的个人应该有教育目标,以帮助他们尽快转移到限制较少的环境中。最小限制环境原则适用于所有学习者。例如,有轻度认知障碍的学生,如果有能力在特殊教育工作者的支持下参加普通班,应该被安排在那里全职学习。同样,如果有严重残疾的学生能够从公立学校的课程中受益,就不应该将他们安排在寄宿项目中。作为一种哲学,限制最少的环境强调了特殊教育项目的流动性,这种哲学可以被认为是当前包容性运动的前奏。由于许多原因,包容性环境在美国各地的学校系统中越来越受欢迎。其中一些原因得到了研究的支持,另一些原因
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信