Does the standardisation of tax enforcement improve corporate financial reporting quality?

Q4 Business, Management and Accounting
Xiaojian Tang, Dongying Du, Lin Xie, B. Lin
{"title":"Does the standardisation of tax enforcement improve corporate financial reporting quality?","authors":"Xiaojian Tang, Dongying Du, Lin Xie, B. Lin","doi":"10.1080/21697213.2022.2143684","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Previous studies of tax enforcement neglect the effect of tax-penalty discretionary benchmarks on corporate financial reporting quality. In China, province-level variations in implementing tax-penalty discretionary benchmarks provide a quasi-natural experiment to explore how tax enforcement standardisation affects corporate financial reporting quality. We show that when tax-penalty benchmarks are implemented in every province, there is a more pronounced positive relationship between tax enforcement standardisation and corporate financial reporting quality compared with the ex-ante period. Moreover, this positive relationship is primarily driven by firms with higher degrees of tax avoidance and collusion with tax collectors. Consequently, the implementation of tax-penalty benchmarks means that the standardisation of tax enforcement can improve corporate financial reporting quality. In turn, tax enforcement standardisation can optimise the external governance environment for listed firms and improve financial information disclosure in capital markets.","PeriodicalId":37215,"journal":{"name":"China Journal of Accounting Studies","volume":"10 1","pages":"481 - 502"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"China Journal of Accounting Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/21697213.2022.2143684","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Business, Management and Accounting","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

ABSTRACT Previous studies of tax enforcement neglect the effect of tax-penalty discretionary benchmarks on corporate financial reporting quality. In China, province-level variations in implementing tax-penalty discretionary benchmarks provide a quasi-natural experiment to explore how tax enforcement standardisation affects corporate financial reporting quality. We show that when tax-penalty benchmarks are implemented in every province, there is a more pronounced positive relationship between tax enforcement standardisation and corporate financial reporting quality compared with the ex-ante period. Moreover, this positive relationship is primarily driven by firms with higher degrees of tax avoidance and collusion with tax collectors. Consequently, the implementation of tax-penalty benchmarks means that the standardisation of tax enforcement can improve corporate financial reporting quality. In turn, tax enforcement standardisation can optimise the external governance environment for listed firms and improve financial information disclosure in capital markets.
税收执法的标准化是否提高了企业财务报告的质量?
以往关于税收执法的研究忽视了税收处罚酌情基准对公司财务报告质量的影响。在中国,各省在实施税收处罚酌情基准方面的差异为探索税收执法标准化如何影响公司财务报告质量提供了一个准自然的实验。我们发现,当每个省份都实施税收处罚基准时,税收执法标准化与企业财务报告质量之间的正相关关系比事前更为明显。此外,这种正向关系主要是由避税程度较高的公司和与收税人员的勾结所驱动的。因此,税收处罚基准的实施意味着税收执法的标准化可以提高企业财务报告质量。而税收执法规范化又可以优化上市公司的外部治理环境,提高资本市场的财务信息披露水平。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
China Journal of Accounting Studies
China Journal of Accounting Studies Business, Management and Accounting-Business, Management and Accounting (all)
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
19
审稿时长
6 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信