The effect of BIS usage on anaesthetic agent consumption in high-risk patients for coronary artery bypass grafting off-pump surgery

Sanjeev Singh, Pavagada Shaifulla, Arti Singh, I. Okyere
{"title":"The effect of BIS usage on anaesthetic agent consumption in high-risk patients for coronary artery bypass grafting off-pump surgery","authors":"Sanjeev Singh, Pavagada Shaifulla, Arti Singh, I. Okyere","doi":"10.4103/hmj.hmj_37_22","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: In patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting off-pump (CABG-OP) surgery with limited haemodynamic reserve, achieving the ideal anaesthesia depth is challenging. The risk of awareness during surgery increases with light anaesthesia, too deep anaesthesia can cause hypotension, delayed awakening, and increased morbidity and mortality. Aims and Objectives: In this study, we aimed to compare whether the use of the Bispectral Index (BIS) reduces the consumption of the anaesthetic drug and improves recovery time in CABG-OP surgery without awareness during surgery (ADS). Materials and Methods: This was a prospective, single-centre, randomised and double-blind comparative research performed on the American Society of Anaesthesiologists (PS) III patients booked for elective CABG-OP surgery under general anaesthesia. Patients received either propofol or isoflurane anaesthesia, and their consumption was calculated and compared. The conventional groups conventional propofol infusion group (CPG)-1 and conventional isoflurane group (CIG-3) received propofol and isoflurane, and haemodynamic parameters (±20% of initial values) were used to check the depth of anaesthesia. The groups BIS-guided propofol infusion group (BPG-2) and BIS-guided isoflurane group (BIG-4) received propofol and isoflurane, and BIS (value 50 ± 5) were used to check the depth of anaesthesia. In addition, haemodynamic parameters, awakening conditions, length of intubation, hospital stay and drug utilisation were recorded. To explicit ADS, patients were interviewed 24 h after extubation. Results: The quantity of propofol used was 178 ± 11 ml in CPG-1 and 117 ± 6 ml in BPG-2, with a 34.26% reduction with BIS. The isoflurane used was 39 ± 8 ml in CIG-3 and 25 ± 6 ml in BIG-4, with a 35.89% reduction in isoflurane requirement. This difference was statistically significantly low with BIS monitored anaesthesia compared to conventional anaesthesia. The length of intubation was 2.2 ± 1.27 and 2.3 ± 1.49 h in groups BPG-2 and BIG-4, respectively (P < 0.05). Conclusion: BIS monitoring aids CABG-OP surgeries by monitoring the depth of anaesthesia (BIS value 50 ± 5), preventing ADS (0%), reducing the anaesthetic agent requirement (propofol 34.26% and isoflurane 35.89%), reducing myocardial depression (mean arterial pressure maintained >74 mmHg) and aiding ultra-fast-track extubation (37% and 50% reduction in the duration of intubation in propofol and isoflurane with BIS).","PeriodicalId":34280,"journal":{"name":"Hamdan Medical Journal","volume":"15 1","pages":"187 - 194"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hamdan Medical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/hmj.hmj_37_22","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: In patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting off-pump (CABG-OP) surgery with limited haemodynamic reserve, achieving the ideal anaesthesia depth is challenging. The risk of awareness during surgery increases with light anaesthesia, too deep anaesthesia can cause hypotension, delayed awakening, and increased morbidity and mortality. Aims and Objectives: In this study, we aimed to compare whether the use of the Bispectral Index (BIS) reduces the consumption of the anaesthetic drug and improves recovery time in CABG-OP surgery without awareness during surgery (ADS). Materials and Methods: This was a prospective, single-centre, randomised and double-blind comparative research performed on the American Society of Anaesthesiologists (PS) III patients booked for elective CABG-OP surgery under general anaesthesia. Patients received either propofol or isoflurane anaesthesia, and their consumption was calculated and compared. The conventional groups conventional propofol infusion group (CPG)-1 and conventional isoflurane group (CIG-3) received propofol and isoflurane, and haemodynamic parameters (±20% of initial values) were used to check the depth of anaesthesia. The groups BIS-guided propofol infusion group (BPG-2) and BIS-guided isoflurane group (BIG-4) received propofol and isoflurane, and BIS (value 50 ± 5) were used to check the depth of anaesthesia. In addition, haemodynamic parameters, awakening conditions, length of intubation, hospital stay and drug utilisation were recorded. To explicit ADS, patients were interviewed 24 h after extubation. Results: The quantity of propofol used was 178 ± 11 ml in CPG-1 and 117 ± 6 ml in BPG-2, with a 34.26% reduction with BIS. The isoflurane used was 39 ± 8 ml in CIG-3 and 25 ± 6 ml in BIG-4, with a 35.89% reduction in isoflurane requirement. This difference was statistically significantly low with BIS monitored anaesthesia compared to conventional anaesthesia. The length of intubation was 2.2 ± 1.27 and 2.3 ± 1.49 h in groups BPG-2 and BIG-4, respectively (P < 0.05). Conclusion: BIS monitoring aids CABG-OP surgeries by monitoring the depth of anaesthesia (BIS value 50 ± 5), preventing ADS (0%), reducing the anaesthetic agent requirement (propofol 34.26% and isoflurane 35.89%), reducing myocardial depression (mean arterial pressure maintained >74 mmHg) and aiding ultra-fast-track extubation (37% and 50% reduction in the duration of intubation in propofol and isoflurane with BIS).
BIS使用对高危冠状动脉旁路移植术患者麻醉药物消耗的影响
背景:在血流动力学储备有限的冠状动脉旁路移植术(CABG-OP)患者中,达到理想的麻醉深度是具有挑战性的。轻度麻醉会增加手术中意识不清的风险,过深的麻醉会导致低血压、延迟苏醒,并增加发病率和死亡率。目的和目的:在本研究中,我们旨在比较双谱指数(BIS)的使用是否减少了CABG-OP手术中麻醉药物的消耗,并缩短了术中无意识(ADS)的恢复时间。材料和方法:这是一项前瞻性、单中心、随机和双盲比较研究,研究对象是在全身麻醉下预定择期CABG-OP手术的美国麻醉师学会(PS) III患者。患者接受异丙酚或异氟醚麻醉,计算并比较其用量。常规组常规异丙酚输注组(CPG)-1和常规异氟醚组(cig3)分别给药异丙酚和异氟醚,采用血流动力学参数(初始值的±20%)检查麻醉深度。BIS引导异丙酚输注组(BPG-2)和BIS引导异氟醚组(BIG-4)分别给予异丙酚和异氟醚,以BIS值(50±5)检查麻醉深度。此外,还记录了血流动力学参数、苏醒情况、插管时间、住院时间和药物使用情况。对于显性ADS,拔管后24 h对患者进行访谈。结果:CPG-1组异丙酚用量178±11 ml, BPG-2组异丙酚用量117±6 ml, BIS组异丙酚用量减少34.26%。g -3组异氟烷使用量为39±8 ml, BIG-4组为25±6 ml,异氟烷需求量减少了35.89%。与常规麻醉相比,BIS监测麻醉的这一差异在统计学上显着降低。BPG-2组插管时间为2.2±1.27 h, BIG-4组插管时间为2.3±1.49 h (P < 0.05)。结论:BIS监测通过监测麻醉深度(BIS值50±5)、预防ADS(0%)、减少麻醉剂需求(异丙酚34.26%、异氟烷35.89%)、减少心肌抑制(平均动脉压维持在bb0 74 mmHg)、辅助超快道拔管(BIS联合异氟烷、异丙酚插管时间分别减少37%和50%)对CABG-OP手术有辅助作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
22
审稿时长
24 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信