Social Work Intervention against Illegal Child Adoption

N. Udechukwu
{"title":"Social Work Intervention against Illegal Child Adoption","authors":"N. Udechukwu","doi":"10.28991/SCIMEDJ-2019-0101-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Children most times are vulnerable to abuse, unable to decide what happen to them and that is why intervention is necessary for the lives of children that are sold to unknown destinations in Nigeria. This study investigates social work intervention strategies against illegal child adoption in Enugu State, Nigeria. Mixed method design is used to authenticate data collected from questionnaire. Ministry of Gender Affairs (Welfare Unit Staff) Enugu and Welfare Office Nsukka were interviewed on the process of adoption and its efficacy. Two hundred questionnaires were shared to 200 respondents using availability sampling as method of their selection. The data were computed using the Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS version 20). The findings show that majority 142 (71%) of the respondents saw adoption as acceptable and government approved while 58 (29%) said it stigmatizes and culturally disapproved. It also showed that majority 126 (63%) go for illegal adoption while 74 (37%) follow legal means. The reasons for illegal adoption – 88 (44%) said cheaper avoiding bottlenecked procedures at the social welfare; 81 (40.5%) said fear of being stigmatized by neighbours and 24 (12%) ignorance of its consequences. Some 72 (36%) said that some sell off their babies to avoid the stigma, shame, family/society’s prosecutions, 85 (42.5%) for economic reasons; 24 (12%) is to do away with the baby and continue with life and 19 (9.5%) supports all of the above reasons. Majority 157 (78.5%) said no serious attention has been given by the government to stop baby selling due to corruption of the law enforcement agencies. The entire 200 (100%) respondents agreed that social workers have many roles in preventing illegal adoption like working with the federal ministry of women or gender affairs to ensure proper child adoption and follow up after adoption to ensure the safety of the baby, since many baby buyers use them for rituals. These findings have obvious implications for social policies and future research on child welfare.","PeriodicalId":74776,"journal":{"name":"SciMedicine journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SciMedicine journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.28991/SCIMEDJ-2019-0101-1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Children most times are vulnerable to abuse, unable to decide what happen to them and that is why intervention is necessary for the lives of children that are sold to unknown destinations in Nigeria. This study investigates social work intervention strategies against illegal child adoption in Enugu State, Nigeria. Mixed method design is used to authenticate data collected from questionnaire. Ministry of Gender Affairs (Welfare Unit Staff) Enugu and Welfare Office Nsukka were interviewed on the process of adoption and its efficacy. Two hundred questionnaires were shared to 200 respondents using availability sampling as method of their selection. The data were computed using the Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS version 20). The findings show that majority 142 (71%) of the respondents saw adoption as acceptable and government approved while 58 (29%) said it stigmatizes and culturally disapproved. It also showed that majority 126 (63%) go for illegal adoption while 74 (37%) follow legal means. The reasons for illegal adoption – 88 (44%) said cheaper avoiding bottlenecked procedures at the social welfare; 81 (40.5%) said fear of being stigmatized by neighbours and 24 (12%) ignorance of its consequences. Some 72 (36%) said that some sell off their babies to avoid the stigma, shame, family/society’s prosecutions, 85 (42.5%) for economic reasons; 24 (12%) is to do away with the baby and continue with life and 19 (9.5%) supports all of the above reasons. Majority 157 (78.5%) said no serious attention has been given by the government to stop baby selling due to corruption of the law enforcement agencies. The entire 200 (100%) respondents agreed that social workers have many roles in preventing illegal adoption like working with the federal ministry of women or gender affairs to ensure proper child adoption and follow up after adoption to ensure the safety of the baby, since many baby buyers use them for rituals. These findings have obvious implications for social policies and future research on child welfare.
针对非法收养儿童的社会工作干预
儿童在大多数时候都容易受到虐待,无法决定自己会发生什么,这就是为什么对被贩卖到尼日利亚未知目的地的儿童的生活进行干预是必要的。本研究调查了尼日利亚埃努古州针对非法收养儿童的社会工作干预策略。采用混合方法设计对问卷调查数据进行验证。性别事务部(福利股工作人员)Enugu和Nsukka福利办公室就收养过程及其效果接受了采访。200份问卷被分享给200名受访者,使用可用性抽样作为他们的选择方法。使用社会科学统计软件包(SPSS版本20)计算数据。调查结果显示,大多数142(71%)的受访者认为收养是可以接受的,政府批准了收养,而58(29%)的受访者表示收养是污名化的,在文化上是不赞成的。调查还显示,大多数126人(63%)选择了非法收养,而74人(37%)选择了合法途径。非法收养的原因——88人(44%)表示,在社会福利中避免瓶颈程序更便宜;81人(40.5%)表示害怕被邻居污名化,24人(12%)表示不知道其后果。约72人(36%)表示,一些人卖掉自己的婴儿是为了避免耻辱、羞耻、家庭/社会的起诉,85人(42.5%)是出于经济原因;24(12%)是为了摆脱婴儿并继续生活,19(9.5%)支持上述所有原因。大多数157人(78.5%)表示,由于执法机构的腐败,政府没有认真注意制止贩卖婴儿的行为。整个200名(100%)受访者一致认为,社会工作者在防止非法收养方面发挥着许多作用,比如与联邦妇女部或性别事务部合作,确保儿童得到适当收养,并在收养后采取后续行动,确保婴儿的安全,因为许多婴儿购买者将其用于仪式。这些发现对社会政策和未来儿童福利研究有着明显的启示。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信