Vicryl or Ethibond for open Surgical Achilles Tendon Repair

M. Tladi
{"title":"Vicryl or Ethibond for open Surgical Achilles Tendon Repair","authors":"M. Tladi","doi":"10.32474/osmoaj.2020.04.000185","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The strongest tendon in the body is the Achilles tendon. Acute tendon rupture can occur and is found most commonly in males. Management of rupture can be conservative or surgical. Surgical management is often associated with wound complications that can occur early or later. By contrast, conservative management is associated with a higher rate of re-rapture. Various suturing open techniques have been reported [1]. Krakow, Kessler and Bunnel suture techniques are commonly used [1,2]. Cadaveric study has shown that the three techniques have no strength differences [3]. The surgeon should be aware of the risk of developing wound complications. Bruggeman et al. have reported that females, tobacco use, and steroid use are risk factors for developing wound complications following open Achilles tendon repair [4]. Nonathletic patients tend to have poor outcomes following Achilles tendon surgery because of a higher body mass index, greater calf circumference, smoking, and greater subcutaneous body fat than athletic patients[5]. The surgeon is often the one who chooses which material to use to suture the tendon. This selection could be based on experience or on how the surgeon was taught. Suture materials can be divided into absorbable and non-absorbable. The absorbable suture commonly used in orthopaedics is vicryl, while ethibond and fibre wire are non-absorbable [6]. The reasons why surgeons use a non-absorbable suture include a higher knot and suture security and holding resistance, and also a belief that this type of suture is stronger [7]. But in biochemical test, it has been found that there was no knot slippage for either type of suture [6]. Kocaoglu et al. reported comparable clinical scores for both suture types, however, the non-absorbable had higher complication rates following Achilles tendon repair. Common complications for a non-absorbable suture include delayed wound healing, wound dehiscence, and at a later stage granulation formation which can present as a chronic sinus [7, 8, 9]. Patients may then require oral antibiotics or surgical debridement that involves removal of the non-absorbable material. When surgically treating Achilles tendon rupture, the absorbable suture material can be used.","PeriodicalId":92940,"journal":{"name":"Orthopedics and sports medicine : open access journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-07-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Orthopedics and sports medicine : open access journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32474/osmoaj.2020.04.000185","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The strongest tendon in the body is the Achilles tendon. Acute tendon rupture can occur and is found most commonly in males. Management of rupture can be conservative or surgical. Surgical management is often associated with wound complications that can occur early or later. By contrast, conservative management is associated with a higher rate of re-rapture. Various suturing open techniques have been reported [1]. Krakow, Kessler and Bunnel suture techniques are commonly used [1,2]. Cadaveric study has shown that the three techniques have no strength differences [3]. The surgeon should be aware of the risk of developing wound complications. Bruggeman et al. have reported that females, tobacco use, and steroid use are risk factors for developing wound complications following open Achilles tendon repair [4]. Nonathletic patients tend to have poor outcomes following Achilles tendon surgery because of a higher body mass index, greater calf circumference, smoking, and greater subcutaneous body fat than athletic patients[5]. The surgeon is often the one who chooses which material to use to suture the tendon. This selection could be based on experience or on how the surgeon was taught. Suture materials can be divided into absorbable and non-absorbable. The absorbable suture commonly used in orthopaedics is vicryl, while ethibond and fibre wire are non-absorbable [6]. The reasons why surgeons use a non-absorbable suture include a higher knot and suture security and holding resistance, and also a belief that this type of suture is stronger [7]. But in biochemical test, it has been found that there was no knot slippage for either type of suture [6]. Kocaoglu et al. reported comparable clinical scores for both suture types, however, the non-absorbable had higher complication rates following Achilles tendon repair. Common complications for a non-absorbable suture include delayed wound healing, wound dehiscence, and at a later stage granulation formation which can present as a chronic sinus [7, 8, 9]. Patients may then require oral antibiotics or surgical debridement that involves removal of the non-absorbable material. When surgically treating Achilles tendon rupture, the absorbable suture material can be used.
Vicryl或Ethibond用于开放性跟腱修复术
身体中最强壮的肌腱是跟腱。急性肌腱断裂可发生,最常见于男性。破裂的治疗可以是保守治疗或手术治疗。手术治疗通常与早期或晚期发生的伤口并发症有关。相比之下,保守的管理与更高的复发率相关。已经报道了各种开放式缝合技术[1]。通常使用Krakow、Kessler和Bunnel缝合技术[1,2]。尸体解剖研究表明,这三种技术没有强度差异[3]。外科医生应该意识到发生伤口并发症的风险。Bruggeman等人报道,女性、吸烟和使用类固醇是开放性跟腱修复后出现伤口并发症的风险因素[4]。非运动型患者在跟腱手术后往往预后不佳,因为与运动型患者相比,其体重指数更高、小腿周长更大、吸烟和皮下脂肪更大[5]。外科医生通常是选择用哪种材料缝合肌腱的人。这种选择可以基于经验或外科医生的教学方式。缝合材料可分为可吸收材料和不可吸收材料。骨科常用的可吸收缝线是维奇尔,而乙硫键和纤维线是不可吸收的[6]。外科医生使用非吸收性缝线的原因包括更高的打结和缝线安全性和握持阻力,以及认为这种缝线更坚固[7]。但在生化测试中,发现任何一种缝合线都没有打结打滑[6]。Kocaoglu等人报道了两种缝线类型的可比临床评分,然而,非吸收性缝线在跟腱修复后的并发症发生率更高。非吸收性缝线的常见并发症包括伤口愈合延迟、伤口裂开和后期肉芽形成,肉芽形成可表现为慢性窦[7,8,9]。然后,患者可能需要口服抗生素或包括去除不可吸收材料的外科清创术。当手术治疗跟腱断裂时,可以使用可吸收缝合材料。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信