Splenectomy Combined with Endoscopic Variceal Ligation (EVL) versus EVL Alone for Secondary Prophylaxis of Variceal Bleeding in Hepatosplenic Schistosomiasis: A Retrospective Case–Control Study

IF 2.6 Q2 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
J. Rakotomalala, C. Razafindrazoto, N. H. Randriamifidy, B. Ralaizanaka, Sonny Maherison, D. H. Hasina Laingonirina, Mialitiana Rakotomaharo, A. Rasolonjatovo, Mamisoa Anicet Rakotovao, A. Rakotozafindrabe, T. Rabenjanahary, Rija Fanantenantsoa, S. Razafimahefa, R. Ramanampamonjy
{"title":"Splenectomy Combined with Endoscopic Variceal Ligation (EVL) versus EVL Alone for Secondary Prophylaxis of Variceal Bleeding in Hepatosplenic Schistosomiasis: A Retrospective Case–Control Study","authors":"J. Rakotomalala, C. Razafindrazoto, N. H. Randriamifidy, B. Ralaizanaka, Sonny Maherison, D. H. Hasina Laingonirina, Mialitiana Rakotomaharo, A. Rasolonjatovo, Mamisoa Anicet Rakotovao, A. Rakotozafindrabe, T. Rabenjanahary, Rija Fanantenantsoa, S. Razafimahefa, R. Ramanampamonjy","doi":"10.2147/HMER.S367849","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background Hepatosplenic schistosomiasis (HSS) is one of the most common causes of portal hypertension in developing countries. Variceal bleeding is the most common cause of mortality during HSS. The objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of splenectomy associated with endoscopic variceal ligation (EVL) compared with EVL alone in preventing variceal bleeding in patients with HSS. Methods This was a single-center, retrospective, case–control study. Between January 2015 and December 2019, a total of 59 patients with HSS who had at least one variceal bleeding episode and received EVL with or without splenectomy were identified and stratified. In this case–control design, 22 patients had splenectomy + EVL (case group) and 37 patients had EVL alone (control group). The main endpoints were the rate of variceal rebleeding and the mortality rate between the two groups. Results The mean age of our patients was 39.92 ± 13.4 (19–75) years with a sex ratio of 1.8. The recurrence rate of variceal bleeding was significantly lower in the case group (splenectomy + EVL) than in the control group (EVL alone) (4.45% vs 27.2%, p = 0.041). There was no significant difference between the two groups in terms of mortality (4.54 vs 2.7%, p = 1.00). Conclusion Splenectomy combined with EVL was effective than EVL alone in preventing variceal rebleeding in patients with HSS.","PeriodicalId":12917,"journal":{"name":"Hepatic Medicine : Evidence and Research","volume":"14 1","pages":"79 - 85"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hepatic Medicine : Evidence and Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/HMER.S367849","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background Hepatosplenic schistosomiasis (HSS) is one of the most common causes of portal hypertension in developing countries. Variceal bleeding is the most common cause of mortality during HSS. The objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of splenectomy associated with endoscopic variceal ligation (EVL) compared with EVL alone in preventing variceal bleeding in patients with HSS. Methods This was a single-center, retrospective, case–control study. Between January 2015 and December 2019, a total of 59 patients with HSS who had at least one variceal bleeding episode and received EVL with or without splenectomy were identified and stratified. In this case–control design, 22 patients had splenectomy + EVL (case group) and 37 patients had EVL alone (control group). The main endpoints were the rate of variceal rebleeding and the mortality rate between the two groups. Results The mean age of our patients was 39.92 ± 13.4 (19–75) years with a sex ratio of 1.8. The recurrence rate of variceal bleeding was significantly lower in the case group (splenectomy + EVL) than in the control group (EVL alone) (4.45% vs 27.2%, p = 0.041). There was no significant difference between the two groups in terms of mortality (4.54 vs 2.7%, p = 1.00). Conclusion Splenectomy combined with EVL was effective than EVL alone in preventing variceal rebleeding in patients with HSS.
脾切除联合内镜下静脉曲张结扎术(EVL)与单独应用EVL二次预防肝脾血吸虫病静脉曲张出血的回顾性病例对照研究
背景肝脾血吸虫病(HSS)是发展中国家门脉高压最常见的病因之一。静脉曲张出血是HSS期间最常见的死亡原因。本研究的目的是评估脾切除联合内镜下静脉曲张结扎术(EVL)与单纯EVL预防HSS患者静脉曲张出血的疗效。方法这是一项单中心、回顾性、病例对照研究。在2015年1月至2019年12月期间,共有59名HSS患者至少有一次静脉曲张破裂出血,并接受了EVL,无论是否进行了脾切除,均进行了鉴定和分层。在这种病例-对照设计中,22名患者接受了脾切除术+EVL(病例组),37名患者单独接受了EVL(对照组)。主要终点是两组之间的静脉曲张再出血率和死亡率。结果本组患者的平均年龄为39.92±13.4(19-75)岁,性别比为1.8。病例组(脾切除术+EVL)的静脉曲张破裂出血复发率显著低于对照组(单独使用EVL)(4.45%vs 27.2%,p=0.041)。两组的死亡率无显著差异(4.54%vs 2.7%,p=0.000)HSS。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Hepatic Medicine : Evidence and Research
Hepatic Medicine : Evidence and Research GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
15
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: Hepatic Medicine: Evidence and Research is an international, peer-reviewed, open access, online journal. Publishing original research, reports, editorials, reviews and commentaries on all aspects of adult and pediatric hepatology in the clinic and laboratory including the following topics: Pathology, pathophysiology of hepatic disease Investigation and treatment of hepatic disease Pharmacology of drugs used for the treatment of hepatic disease Although the main focus of the journal is to publish research and clinical results in humans; preclinical, animal and in vitro studies will be published where they will shed light on disease processes and potential new therapies. Issues of patient safety and quality of care will also be considered. As of 1st April 2019, Hepatic Medicine: Evidence and Research will no longer consider meta-analyses for publication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信