The Order of the Kushite Kings According to Sources from the Eastern Desert and Thebes. Or: Shabataka was here first!

IF 0.3 Q2 HISTORY
Claus Jurman
{"title":"The Order of the Kushite Kings According to Sources from the Eastern Desert and Thebes. Or: Shabataka was here first!","authors":"Claus Jurman","doi":"10.1163/18741665-12340037","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The correct order of the first two kings of the Twenty-Fifth Dynasty has been the subject of a growing debate since Michael Banyai proposed a revision of the traditional chronological model in 2013. By placing Shabataka 1 before Shabaka Banyai challenged the commonly accepted view according to which it was Shabaka who established the Twenty-Fifth Dynasty and secured Kushite control over all of Egypt after having re-conquered the North and disposed of his adversary Bocchoris of the Twenty-Fourth Dynasty. Since then Banyai’s proposal of modifying the sequence of the Kushite kings, thus making Shabataka Bocchoris’ opponent, has received a growing number of supporters who have brought forward additional arguments in favour of it.The present article introduces new arguments based on a careful analysis of prosopographic, archaeological, and epigraphic data from the Eastern Desert and Thebes—especially relating to the Kushite Nile Level Records at Karnak—which provide the strongest evidence for the sequence “Shabaka—Shabataka” hitherto adduced.","PeriodicalId":41016,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Egyptian History","volume":"10 1","pages":"124-151"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2017-11-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1163/18741665-12340037","citationCount":"16","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Egyptian History","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/18741665-12340037","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 16

Abstract

The correct order of the first two kings of the Twenty-Fifth Dynasty has been the subject of a growing debate since Michael Banyai proposed a revision of the traditional chronological model in 2013. By placing Shabataka 1 before Shabaka Banyai challenged the commonly accepted view according to which it was Shabaka who established the Twenty-Fifth Dynasty and secured Kushite control over all of Egypt after having re-conquered the North and disposed of his adversary Bocchoris of the Twenty-Fourth Dynasty. Since then Banyai’s proposal of modifying the sequence of the Kushite kings, thus making Shabataka Bocchoris’ opponent, has received a growing number of supporters who have brought forward additional arguments in favour of it.The present article introduces new arguments based on a careful analysis of prosopographic, archaeological, and epigraphic data from the Eastern Desert and Thebes—especially relating to the Kushite Nile Level Records at Karnak—which provide the strongest evidence for the sequence “Shabaka—Shabataka” hitherto adduced.
根据来自东部沙漠和底比斯的资料,库施国王的命令。或者:沙巴塔卡先来的!
自2013年Michael Banyai提出对传统年表模式的修订以来,第二十五王朝前两位国王的正确顺序一直是越来越多争论的主题。通过将Shabataka 1置于Shabaka Banyai之前,挑战了普遍接受的观点,即Shabaka在重新征服北方并处置了他的对手第二十四王朝的Bocchoris后,建立了第二十五王朝,并确保了Kushite对整个埃及的控制。从那时起,Banyai修改Kushite国王序列的提议,从而使Shabataka Bocchoris成为他的对手,得到了越来越多的支持者的支持,他们提出了更多的支持,以及来自东部沙漠和底比斯的铭文数据,特别是与卡纳克的Kushite尼罗河水位记录有关的数据,为迄今为止引用的“Shabaka-Shabataka”序列提供了最有力的证据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
42.90%
发文量
5
期刊介绍: The Journal of Egyptian History (JEgH) aims to encourage and stimulate a focused debate on writing and interpreting Egyptian history ranging from the Neolithic foundations of Ancient Egypt to its modern reception. It covers all aspects of Ancient Egyptian history (political, social, economic, and intellectual) and of modern historiography about Ancient Egypt (methodologies, hermeneutics, interplay between historiography and other disciplines, and history of modern Egyptological historiography). The journal is open to contributions in English, German, and French.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信