Exposition of Revision of Seismic Design Guideline for Overhead Contact Systems

Q4 Engineering
Yûichi Kondô
{"title":"Exposition of Revision of Seismic Design Guideline for Overhead Contact Systems","authors":"Yûichi Kondô","doi":"10.2219/rtriqr.63.3_169","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In Japan, in order to prevent supports (referred to poles and portal structure etc.) in overhead contact systems from collapsing at the time of an earthquake, we design them according to the Seismic Design Guideline for Overhead Contact Systems and Commentary (hereafter referred to as the OCS Guideline). We revised the OCS Guideline in 2013 to evaluate seismic performance of supports more precisely. The paper shows the process of revising OCS Guideline until now and details of the latest revision of the OCS Guideline. and the separat ed model. In case of the unified model based on the consideration of unifying supports and civil engineering structures, we evaluate the response acceleration of supports to the ground motion. However, it is difficult and complex to evaluate the response acceleration of supports. On the other hand, the separated model is easy to evaluate of RTRI, Earth retaining structures, such as bridge abutments and retaining walls, are con-structed at the boundary of bridges or embankments. There are a variety of earth retaining structure failure modes, therefore in order to be able to ensure rational aseismic reinforcement, it is necessary to develop a range of different aseismic reinforcement methods adapted to the relevant earth retaining structure’s failure mode. Moreover, there are many cases where construction work is severely restricted due to various limitations, such as land boundaries, available space, and time available for construction work. Therefore, the authors propose an aseismic reinforcement method, which can both improve seismic performance of earth retaining structures and be carried out efficiently. This paper outlines this research and describes some examples of the practical application of the newly developed reinforcement method.","PeriodicalId":52445,"journal":{"name":"Quarterly Report of RTRI (Railway Technical Research Institute) (Japan)","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Quarterly Report of RTRI (Railway Technical Research Institute) (Japan)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2219/rtriqr.63.3_169","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Engineering","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In Japan, in order to prevent supports (referred to poles and portal structure etc.) in overhead contact systems from collapsing at the time of an earthquake, we design them according to the Seismic Design Guideline for Overhead Contact Systems and Commentary (hereafter referred to as the OCS Guideline). We revised the OCS Guideline in 2013 to evaluate seismic performance of supports more precisely. The paper shows the process of revising OCS Guideline until now and details of the latest revision of the OCS Guideline. and the separat ed model. In case of the unified model based on the consideration of unifying supports and civil engineering structures, we evaluate the response acceleration of supports to the ground motion. However, it is difficult and complex to evaluate the response acceleration of supports. On the other hand, the separated model is easy to evaluate of RTRI, Earth retaining structures, such as bridge abutments and retaining walls, are con-structed at the boundary of bridges or embankments. There are a variety of earth retaining structure failure modes, therefore in order to be able to ensure rational aseismic reinforcement, it is necessary to develop a range of different aseismic reinforcement methods adapted to the relevant earth retaining structure’s failure mode. Moreover, there are many cases where construction work is severely restricted due to various limitations, such as land boundaries, available space, and time available for construction work. Therefore, the authors propose an aseismic reinforcement method, which can both improve seismic performance of earth retaining structures and be carried out efficiently. This paper outlines this research and describes some examples of the practical application of the newly developed reinforcement method.
架空接触系统抗震设计导则修订论述
在日本,为了防止架空接触网中的支架(指支柱和门式结构等)在地震发生时倒塌,我们根据《架空接触网抗震设计指南和评注》(以下简称《接触网指南》)进行设计。我们在2013年修订了OCS指南,以更准确地评估支架的抗震性能。本文介绍了迄今为止OCS指南的修订过程,以及OCS指南最新修订的细节。以及分离的模型。在考虑统一支架和土木工程结构的统一模型的情况下,我们评估了支架对地震动的响应加速度。然而,评估支架的响应加速度既困难又复杂。另一方面,分离模型易于评估RTRI,桥台和挡土墙等挡土结构建在桥梁或路堤的边界。挡土结构的破坏模式多种多样,因此,为了能够确保合理的抗震加固,有必要开发一系列适合于相关挡土结构破坏模式的不同抗震加固方法。此外,在许多情况下,由于土地边界、可用空间和可用于施工的时间等各种限制,施工工作受到严重限制。因此,作者提出了一种既能提高挡土结构抗震性能又能有效实施的抗震加固方法。本文概述了这项研究,并介绍了新开发的加固方法的一些实际应用实例。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
36
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信